Law & Courts

Courts Push Lawmakers to the Wall on Funding

By Daarel Burnette II — February 23, 2016 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Again and again, state supreme courts in Washington and Kansas have deemed their states’ school funding formulas unconstitutional, in various rulings spread over a number of years.

In response, state legislatures—in the view of the impatient justices—have either dragged their feet, backpedaled, or come up with inadequate solutions.

Both courts seem to be fed up.

A ruling by Kansas’ high court earlier this month would effectively shut the entire school system down if lawmakers fail to come up with a formula the court finds equitable by June 30. The justices are expected to decide later this year if the state’s current block grant formula is adequate in terms of overall funding.

And in Washington, the state continues to pay $100,000 in fines into a special account—totaling more than $15 million so far—after the state supreme court decided last year the legislature wasn’t moving fast enough to respond to the court’s 2012 order to come up with a new formula and found the legislature in contempt of court.

As of last week, both legislatures were puzzling over ways to pump millions more dollars into their school districts’ budgets.

In Kansas, legislators met with school officials and financial analysts to discuss how to provide more money. The House passed an overall state budget that closed a $200 million budget deficit, resulting from a slash in personal income-tax rates in 2012 and 2013. But the budget doesn’t answer the supreme court’s demand that the legislature come up with an extra $54 million for the state’s poor districts.

Legislative Rumbles

Some Kansas lawmakers and state officials are making rumbles about defying what they see as a court overstepping its boundaries.

Washington’s Senate last week passed a so-called “plan for a plan” that sets a deadline of the end of the 2017 session to come up with a new funding formula. Another bill passed by the house would allow districts to raise their local taxes.

While some legislators believe the action will satisfy the court’s mandate in McCleary v. State of Washington, others described it as telling schools “the check is in the mail.”

Randy Dorn, the state’s superintendent of instruction, said the schools can’t wait another year.

“This is not just a funding problem,” he said, citing a teacher shortage in the rural parts of the state and a yawning achievement gap between students of color and white students. “It’s a civil rights issue.”

Although it’s rare, courts sometimes fine legislatures—as the high court in Washington state has done—or threaten to shut down schools over funding formulas, said Michael A. Rebell, a professor at Teachers College, Columbia University, who tracks battles over school funding formulas.

Courts in New Jersey, Ohio, Texas, and West Virginia have held legislatures in contempt over school funding formulas they deemed unconstitutional, said Rebell.

In 2005, the Kansas Supreme Court said it would “consider” shutting down the schools if the legislature didn’t craft a funding formula the court deemed sufficient. But the legislature called a special session over that summer and devised a formula before school began.

“This time they’re not saying they’re considering; they’re saying, ‘We’ll do it,’ ” said Rebell of the latest decision by the Kansas justices. “They said, ‘We’re not going to stand for this. Give the money to the poor districts by June 30 or we’ll pull out the atom bomb of all remedies.’ That’s surely going to get the attention from legislators.”

The most recent decision in Kansas stems from a 2010 lawsuit, Gannon v. State of Kansas, filed by the Dodge City, Hutchinson, Kansas City, and Wichita districts. They contended that the funding formula is both inequitable and inadequate and violates the state constitution.

The state supreme court, in 2014, ruled in the districts’ favor on the equity part of the lawsuit. The legislature then added $140 million to the funding formula and enacted a two-year block grant formula.

Those districts sued again, arguing that the funding formula froze funds, forcing them to increase their local property taxes to provide teachers with raises.

“There are essential things our kids are doing without,” said Shelly Kiblinger, the superintendent of the Hutchinson schools. Kiblinger said the district increased class sizes, laid off administrators, and last summer raised property taxes to provide teachers their first raise in years. That cost, the high court decided this month, lies with the state, not local taxpayers.

Soon after the latest decision was handed down, some state leaders said the court had overstepped its boundaries and had attempted to interrupt the budget process.

“Kansas has among the best schools in the nation, and an activist Kansas Supreme Court is threatening to shut them down,” Gov. Sam Brownback, a Republican, said in a statement.

Some Kansas lawmakers said the courts were meddling in legislative affairs. And in a move that hinted to some observers that the state will defy the court’s orders, the legislature earmarked $50,000 to pay for a lawyer to represent it in future school funding cases.

In the meantime, a bill has been proposed to replace the temporary block grant formula with a formula based on class size.

And a consultant firm’s study that cost the legislature $2.6 million suggests that by districts’ spending down their rainy-day funds, the state could save a potential $193 million over the next five years.

“The state impoverished itself by drastically slashing its state income tax,” said John Robb, the lawyer who represented the districts in the lawsuit. “Now, they claim they’re broke and they can’t fund the schools. It’s a self-inflicted wound.”

A version of this article appeared in the February 24, 2016 edition of Education Week as Courts Push Lawmakers to the Wall Over K-12 Funding

Events

Federal Webinar The Trump Budget and Schools: Subscriber Exclusive Quick Hit
EdWeek subscribers, join this 30-minute webinar to find out what the latest federal policy changes mean for K-12 education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
End Student Boredom: K-12 Publisher's Guide to 70% Engagement Boost
Calling all K-12 Publishers! Student engagement flatlining? Learn how to boost it by up to 70%.
Content provided by KITABOO
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management
Moving the Needle on Attendance: What’s Working NOW
See how family engagement is improving attendance, and how to put it to work in schools.
Content provided by TalkingPoints

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Religious Charter School Blocked After Supreme Court Deadlock
The U.S. Supreme Court's 4-4 split over a religious charter school affirms a lower court ruling against the school but sets no precedent.
6 min read
Supporters of charter schools rally outside of the Supreme Court on Wednesday, April 30, 2025, in Washington.
Supporters of religious charter schools rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court on April 30 as the justices weighed Oklahoma's approval of such a charter. On May 22, the court tied 4-4, leaving in place an Oklahoma Supreme Court ruling that said such religious charters were unconstitutional.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Gives Relief to Maine Legislator in Transgender Sports Controversy
The U.S. Supreme Court temporarily restored voting privileges to a Maine lawmaker whose social media post criticized a transgender athlete.
3 min read
Rep. Laurel Libby, R-Auburn, speaks in opposition to a heating assistance package, Wednesday, Jan. 4, 2023, at the State House in Augusta, Maine.
State Rep. Laurel D. Libby speaks at the State House in Augusta, Maine, on Jan. 4, 2023. Libby's February social media post about a transgender athlete ultimately led to a White House confrontation between President Donald Trump and Maine Gov. Janet D. Mills that has escalated to the point of the U.S. Department of Education threatening the state's federal school funding.
Robert F. Bukaty/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Case on Birthright Citizenship Sparks Fears for School Funding
The justices are weighing whether to allow nationwide injunctions of President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.
5 min read
Hannah Liu, 26, of Washington, holds up a sign in support of birthright citizenship on May 15, 2025, outside of the Supreme Court in Washington. "This is enshrined in the Constitution. My parents are Chinese immigrants," says Liu. "They came here on temporary visas so I derive my citizenship through birthright."
Hannah Liu, 26, of Washington, holds up a sign in support of birthright citizenship on May 15, 2025, outside of the Supreme Court in Washington. "This is enshrined in the Constitution. My parents are Chinese immigrants," says Liu. "They came here on temporary visas so I derive my citizenship through birthright."
Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Law & Courts Opinion What the Supreme Court Case on LGBTQ+ Books Reminds Us About Parents’ Rights
Regardless of which side wins Mahmoud v. Taylor, we have a big problem.
Jamie Kudlats & Christopher D. Thomas
5 min read
Man and woman waiting around speech bubble hole
E+/Getty