Law & Courts

Schools’ Bible Courses ‘Taught Wrong,’ Report Says

By John Gehring — January 19, 2000 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

All 14 public school districts in Florida that offer courses on the Bible are violating the U.S. Constitution by teaching from a religious perspective, a report released last week by the People For the American Way Foundation contends.

Follow-Up

“The Good Book Taught Wrong: ‘Bible History’ Classes in Florida’s Public Schools” is available online at http://www.pfaw.org/
issues/liberty/
florida-bible.pdf
(requires Adobe’s Acrobat Reader) or by calling (800) 326-7329.

In its 54-page report, “The Good Book Taught Wrong: ‘Bible History’ Classes in Florida’s Public Schools,” the Washington-based liberal watchdog group uses the courses’ instructional materials and exams to make its case.

“There is a right way and a wrong way to teach the Bible,” said Lisa Versaci, the Florida director of the People For the American Way Foundation. “There is the legal issue, but more importantly the education issue. You have a group of kids being left out. There is proselytizing going on in the public schools.”

The foundation, which sued the Lee County school board in Fort Myers, Fla., last year over two proposed Bible courses, highlights five common ways it says the 14 districts are violating the law. According to the report, the Bible courses are framed and taught from Christian, usually Protestant, perspectives; the Bible is used as a history textbook; students are assumed to be Christian; the Bible is used to promote Christian faith formation and religious values; and Sunday school and other religious-training exercises are used to indoctrinate students in Bible content.

A Bible history class taught at Clay High School, for example, includes an exam question that PFAW officials regard as inappropriate for public school instruction. The true-or-false question asked students whether the first three of the Ten Commandments deal with “our relationship with God.”

“The teacher here is assuming ‘we’ have a relationship with God,” the report says, “bringing a religious perspective to the course, and also putting a student who does not believe in God in a very difficult position in terms of answering this question as ‘true’ or ‘false.’ ”

David Owens, the superintendent of the 28,000-student district and a former Clay High School principal, acknowledged the sensitive nature of teaching about the Bible in public schools, but disagreed with the conclusions drawn by the report.

“We don’t teach the Bible from a religious viewpoint or from a particular belief,” he said. “We have atheists in class, people from different faiths. This is an elective class where they choose to be here. I am very comfortable with how this is taught.”

Changes Sought

Work on the report began after People For the American Way Foundation lawyers, a Florida law firm, and the American Civil Liberties Union sued the Lee County school board in federal court over the board’s decision to adopt two Bible history courses that some residents viewed as promoting religion. The two sides reached a settlement when the board agreed to drop a controversial New Testament curriculum and to change the name of the remaining course from “Bible History” to “Introduction to the Bible.”

Foundation officials said last week that they hoped the report would spur changes in the Florida districts’ courses so that further legal action can be avoided.

Along with the report, PFAW officials sent a letter to Florida education officials requesting that they withdraw approval of the disputed Bible courses in their present form.

Karen Chandler, the communications director for the Florida Department of Education, said the state legislature allows objective instruction about religion and the Bible in public schools. “We have no authority over the districts’ curriculum or how it is taught,” she said. “Our responsibility is to have an objective course description. This is an issue this group may want to address at the local or legislative level.”

PFAW officials also sent letters to the superintendents of the 14 Florida districts asking them to make changes in the courses, as well as copies of “The Bible and Public Schools: A First Amendment Guide,” recently published by the Freedom Forum’s First Amendment Center and the National Bible Association.

The publication, endorsed by a broad coalition of groups including the Christian Legal Society, the Anti-Defamation League, and the National School Boards Association, offers school leaders guidance on how to teach about the Bible in public schools without violating the Constitution. (“Groups Endorse Guidelines On Using the Bible in Instruction,” Nov. 17, 1999.)

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the January 19, 2000 edition of Education Week as Schools’ Bible Courses ‘Taught Wrong,’ Report Says

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
(Re)Focus on Dyslexia: Moving Beyond Diagnosis & Toward Transformation
Move beyond dyslexia diagnoses & focus on effective literacy instruction for ALL students. Join us to learn research-based strategies that benefit learners in PreK-8.
Content provided by EPS Learning
Classroom Technology Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Is AI Out to Take Your Job or Help You Do It Better?
With all of the uncertainty K-12 educators have around what AI means might mean for the future, how can the field best prepare young people for an AI-powered future?
Special Education K-12 Essentials Forum Understanding Learning Differences
Join this free virtual event for insights that will help educators better understand and support students with learning differences.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts A School Board Tried to Make Public Comments Civil. It Went Too Far, Court Says
The rules blocked protected speech or were inconsistently applied, judges say.
4 min read
Law themed still life featuring Themis statue, judge gavel and scale of justice in a law library.
iStock / Getty Images
Law & Courts Two Notable Education Cases the Supreme Court Declined to Take Up This Term
The justices turned away cases on public aid to nonpublic schools and the 2021 controversy over school board protests.
4 min read
Visitors take photographs of the U.S. Supreme Court on June 18, 2024, in Washington.
Visitors take photographs of the U.S. Supreme Court on June 18, 2024, in Washington.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Law & Courts What's Ahead for Education This Supreme Court Term? Trans Rights, E-Rate, and More
The justices have one major case on transgender medical care on their docket and others pending on gender-identity issues in schools.
10 min read
The Supreme Court on Wednesday afternoon, April 19, 2023, in Washington.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday afternoon, April 19, 2023, in Washington.
Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Law & Courts Biden Administration Asks Supreme Court to Spare Huge E-Rate Funding Source
A lower court ruling has jeopardized more than $2 billion in annual funding for internet connectivity for schools and libraries.
3 min read
FILE - The Supreme Court is seen under stormy skies in Washington, June 20, 2019. In the coming days, the Supreme Court will confront a perfect storm mostly of its own making, a trio of decisions stemming directly from the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
The Biden administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court—shown here in June 2019—to reinstate a funding mechanism that distributes $2 billion annually for the E-rate program that supports internet connectivity in schools and libraries. A federal appeals court ruled that the mechanism was unconstitutional in July.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP