Law & Courts

Sauce for Gander: Districts Sue Court in Finance Dispute

By Mark Walsh — February 25, 2008 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

It’s not unusual for school districts to band together to file an education finance lawsuit against their state government.

What is unusual—and may be unprecedented—is for districts to sue the members of their state’s supreme court in a school finance case. That’s happened in Idaho. And, to the surprise of observers, the school districts have the upper hand so far.

The Idaho Supreme Court ruled in 2005 that the state’s school finance system was unconstitutional. But some 15 districts that brought the suit soon complained that the court failed to require the state to come up with a remedy. (“Funding Advocates Accuse Idaho’s High Court Of ‘Cop-Out’,” Nov. 29, 2006.)

The districts sued the state high court justices in federal court.

See Also

See other stories on education issues in Idaho. See data on Idaho’s public school system.

On Feb. 7, U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill of Boise rejected the supreme court justices’ motion to dismiss the federal suit. The justices on the five-member court had argued that only the U.S. Supreme Court may review the final ruling of a state’s highest court.

But Judge Winmill said that the situation was not a matter of the losing party seeking review of the state supreme court’s decision. The districts were the prevailing party, he said, and they “take issue with the apparent lack of remedy.”

The judge did appear to try to nudge the state high court to clarify matters on its own.

“An expedited order by the Idaho Supreme Court clarifying the posture of the state-court action may be all that is needed to facilitate a quick and inexpensive resolution of this case,” Judge Winmill said in his ruling.

Merlyn W. Clark, a Boise lawyer representing the state justices, told the Idaho Statesman newspaper that the federal judge hadn’t addressed the justices’ argument that he does not have jurisdiction.

Robert C. Huntley, a Boise lawyer representing the school districts, said in an interview that the federal judge wasn’t yet ordering the state high court to do anything.

“But he made it very clear that if we don’t get a remedy phase, that [the supreme court justices] are violating our 14th Amendment due process,” said Mr. Huntley, who himself served on the Idaho Supreme Court, from 1982 to 1989.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the February 27, 2008 edition of Education Week

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Budget & Finance Webinar
Innovative Funding Models: A Deep Dive into Public-Private Partnerships
Discover how innovative funding models drive educational projects forward. Join us for insights into effective PPP implementation.
Content provided by Follett Learning
Budget & Finance Webinar Staffing Schools After ESSER: What School and District Leaders Need to Know
Join our newsroom for insights on investing in critical student support positions as pandemic funds expire.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
How can districts build sustainable tutoring models before the money runs out?
District leaders, low on funds, must decide: broad support for all or deep interventions for few? Let's discuss maximizing tutoring resources.
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts District Can Deny Opt-Outs on LGBTQ+ Books, Court Rules
Religious parents objected to a Maryland district's policy ending opt-outs for elementary school 'storybooks' with LGBTQ+ themes.
5 min read
A pedestrian passes by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Courthouse, June 16, 2021, on Main Street in Richmond, Va.
A person walks near the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit's courthouse in Richmond, Va. A panel of the court denied an injunction seeking to restore religious parents' opportunity to opt their children out of LGBTQ+ "storybooks" in a Maryland district.
Steve Helber/AP
Law & Courts Brown v. Board of Education: 70 Years of Progress and Challenges
The milestone for the historic 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down racial segregation in schools is marked by a range of tributes
12 min read
People mill around the third floor of the Kansas Statehouse in front of a Brown v. Board of Education mural before hearing from speakers recognizing the 70th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court case on April 29, 2024 in Topeka, Kan.
People mill around the third floor of the Kansas Statehouse in front of a Brown v. Board of Education mural before hearing from speakers recognizing the 70th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court case on April 29, 2024 in Topeka, Kan.
Evert Nelson/The Topeka Capital-Journal via AP
Law & Courts Republican-Led States Sue to Block New Title IX Rule
A pair of lawsuits focus on the rule's protections for students' gender identity.
5 min read
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus. Four Republican-led states filed a lawsuit Monday challenging the Biden administration's new Title IX regulation, which among other things would codify protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus. Four Republican-led states filed a lawsuit Monday challenging the Biden administration's new Title IX regulation, which among other things would codify protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Patrick Orsagos/AP
Law & Courts Why It Will Now Be Easier for Educators to Sue Over Job Transfers
The case asked whether transferred employees had to show a 'significant' change in job conditions to sue under Title VII. The court said no.
8 min read
Light illuminates part of the Supreme Court building at dusk on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 16, 2022.
Light illuminates part of the Supreme Court building at dusk on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 16, 2022. The high court on Wednesday, April 17, 2024, made it easier for workers, including educators, to sue over job transfers.
Patrick Semansky/AP