Federal

Report Challenging Federal Pre-K Ideas Gets Sharp Rebuttal

By Linda Jacobson — April 08, 2008 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A report that questions the wisdom of several federal prekindergarten proposals has drawn a sharply worded response from a leading proponent of public preschool programs.

Released last month by the Lexington Institute, a think tank based in Arlington, Va., the report critiques pre-K proposals made by the Democratic presidential candidates as well as bills introduced in Congress that would expand the federal role in providing preschool.

The authors, Robert Holland and Don Soifer, argue that the case for spending more tax dollars on preschool, particularly for children in middle-class families, is based on weak evidence from research that has focused largely on disadvantaged children.

The report also highlights the findings from some studies about the increase in behavior problems among children in center-based programs. (“New Analysis Bolsters Child Care, Behavior Link’,” April 4, 2007.)

And it suggests that policymakers instead turn to market-based alternatives, such as vouchers that could be used for preschool.

“Given the reality that the vast majority of early-childhood care and education is provided in the private sector, creating a universal, government-funded system of pre-K that supplants such market-oriented solutions seems dubious, at best,” the authors write.

But a review calls the Lexington Institute paper “incomplete, misleading, biased, and inaccurate.”

“Rather than capitalizing on an opportunity to clarify an area of policy that is ripe for change, the report manages to muddy the waters,” writes W. Steven Barnett, the director of the National Institute for Early Education Research, based at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J.

Writing for the Think Tank Review Project, an effort that analyzes studies from various organizations, Mr. Barnett contends that the Lexington report misuses research on children’s behavior outcomes and ignores “alternative explanations.”

He says the authors also depended too much on the view of one economist, the University of Chicago’s James Heckman, who favors limiting public preschool programs to children from low-income families.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the April 09, 2008 edition of Education Week

Events

Teaching Profession K-12 Essentials Forum Supporting the New K-12 Workforce: What Teachers Need to Stay at School
 Join this free virtual event to discover what teachers say they need to feel supported to stay in classrooms for the long haul.
College & Workforce Readiness K-12 Essentials Forum Career and Technical Education Takes Its Next Big Step
Join this free virtual event to hear creative approaches to modernize CTE programs and navigate the shift away from a near-exclusive focus on "college preparedness."

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Oregon Rep. Says Linda McMahon Has ‘Betrayed Students,’ Pushes Impeachment
The Democratic lawmaker cited the transfer of programs to other agencies as reason to oust the ed. secretary.
Alissa Gary, oregonlive.com
1 min read
Rep. Suzanne Bonamici, D-Ore., conducts a news conference with members of the Democratic Women's Caucus (DWC), during the House Democrats 2025 Issues Conference at the Lansdowne Resort in Leesburg, Va., on March 14, 2025. Reps. Melanie Stansbury, D-N.M., left, and Teresa Leger Fernandez, D-N.M., are also pictured.
Rep. Suzanne Bonamici, D-Ore., conducts a news conference with members of the Democratic Women's Caucus (DWC), during the House Democrats 2025 Issues Conference at the Lansdowne Resort in Leesburg, Va., on March 14, 2025. Reps. Melanie Stansbury, D-N.M., left, and Teresa Leger Fernandez, D-N.M., are also pictured.
Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP
Federal Opinion The Ed. Dept.'s Civil Rights and Special Ed. Offices Are Moving. Here's What That Means
Short-term changes are unlikely to be noticeable. Longer term, they may be consequential.
9 min read
The United States Capitol building as a bookcase filled with red, white, and blue policy books in a Washington DC landscape.
Luca D'Urbino for Education Week
Federal Opinion ‘None of This Is Abstract’: The Real Harm of Trump’s Ed. Dept. Civil Rights Move
Here’s why families will feel it when student civil rights enforcement moves to the Justice Dept.
Alumni Collective of the U.S. Dept. of Ed., Office for Civil Rights
4 min read
Image of a box of files
Laura Baker/Education Week + Getty
Federal Special Ed. and Civil Rights: What We Know About the Ed. Dept.'s Latest Moves
Special education is moving to HHS, and civil rights enforcement is moving to DOJ.
6 min read
Letters on the Department of Education building are missing after removal of America 250 banners, which included those of Booker T. Washington, Catharine Beecher and Charlie Kirk, March 18, 2026, in Washington.
Letters on the U.S. Department of Education building are missing in this March 18, 2026, photo in Washington. The agency last week announced it's transferring day-to-day management of special education and civil rights enforcement to different Cabinet agencies, the latest push by the Trump administration to dismantle the Education Department.
Allison Robbert/AP Photo