The following guest post is by Kip Hottman, a 2013-14 Hope Street Group Fellow and Spanish teacher at Oldham County High School located north of Louisville, Kentucky. Kip just completed his tenth year as a Spanish
teacher and has served as the lead teacher for the World Language department’s
Professional Learning Community
The biggest impact on student learning comes directly from the teachers in the classroom. With more funding, our district would be able to change the
teacher to student ratio and hire more teachers. These teachers would be able to differentiate instruction to meet the needs of all students. Our district
has had to cut the Special Education department, which means the students who need the most help are not getting the level of help they need.
More teachers means more individual attention for all students, especially to provide support for those with Individual Education Plans or 504 plans, and
those identified as gifted and talented who should be receiving enrichment.
We need more time to gather with other teachers in professional learning communities to data crunch, intentionally plan and collaborate.
The Kentucky Core Academic Standards prompt deeper
thinking and learning, but all students need avenues of support to be successful. We are slowly destroying these avenues.
While education funding supports our overall educational effort, nothing can replace an effective teacher who can inspire students to want to learn.
If teachers don’t grow, then our students suffer. Educators can always learn something new from a conference, convening or webinar. Funding for education
allows teachers to collaborate outside of their community and district. Without funding, professional development (PD) is usually within the county or
school. Yes, teachers can collaborate within this small world, but there is a world of education outside of Kentucky through which we can truly advance our
teaching. Funding can break these barriers and give opportunities to truly learn something new. Our PD this past year was constricted to our school and we
missed out on the opportunity to learn from others who may have more expertise.
Our students are being denied techniques, theories, technology and information that could truly help them toward becoming college- and career-ready.
The impact of reduced education funding has such a catastrophic effect on students which in turn affects their future and ours. How can we say that we are
ensuring all students a quality education when we are taking away their pathways towards success by cutting funding, and removing the very people who are
going to help them meet their needs, TEACHERS?
As a parent, I wonder why everyone is saying that education is “so important and we want all of our kids to be college- and career-ready” and then taking
away the means to get there? My daughter will begin kindergarten and what will happen to her and all of our children if education funding is not a
In our county, our students are receiving the same SEEK funding that they received in 2008. This is 24
percent less than they received in 2005-2006 ($4,621 per student). If this trend continues, the students in the future (including my daughter and son) will
not be able to receive an appropriate education due to the loss of what is most important in education, TEACHERS!
Other countries such as Finland have made education a priority. We need to do the same. It is time to look at our budget and reflect on what our children
truly need, rather than looking at funding through a political lens, which usually benefits adults (or a specific political group), and not our kids!
The opinions expressed in Public Engagement & Ed Reform are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.