Federal Opinion

Early Childhood Proposals, Realistic and Otherwise

By Alexander Russo — May 22, 2007 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

On Monday, Sen. Clinton came out with a $10 billion early childhood proposal that (Clinton Pushes Pre - Kindergarten Proposal). Apparently designed by Catherine Brown and Jake Sullivan on the Clinton domestic team, it looks pretty vanilla to me, but wins a speedy approval from the Ed Sector’s Sara Mead, who says about the Clinton plan that it is “right on the merits and also plays well politically.” Oh, goody.

Over at Early Stories, Richard Colvin takes a slightly broader look around, pointing out that neither Clinton nor the Ed Sector are alone in the early childhood space (New America, Obama, and Pelosi are others), that there are complicated politics to expanding the federal role in early childhood (ie, Head Start), and that the Clinton plan includes some unaddressed and unrealistic elements (ie, college-educated teachers in early childhood classrooms).

For some early childhood ideas that are more closely connected to existing legislation and that have some more realistic ideas for where to get the money, check out New America’s event and new paper on early childhood, also released today. And I’m not just saying that because I did some editing work on it. The event includes tasty new comments from Mead, Sullivan, and Bel Sawhill.

Related Tags:

The opinions expressed in This Week In Education are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.