Accountability

New Group Takes Aim at ‘Toxic Nature’ of K-12 Debate

By Mark Walsh — September 09, 2014 3 min read

A well-funded new communications organization headed by a former aide to U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan aims to elevate the tone and goals of the national debate over K-12 education policy, its leaders and backers say.

“We plan to bring in voices of a lot of people who are turned off by the toxic nature of the conversation to see if we can facilitate a more productive and respectful conversation,” said Peter Cunningham, the executive director of the new group, Education Post. He was assistant secretary for communications and outreach at the U.S. Department of Education for most of President Barack Obama’s first term.

Education Post has attracted initial funding of $12 million over three years from the Los Angeles-based Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation, the New York City-based Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Bentonville, Ark.-based Walton Family Foundation, and an anonymous donor. (The Broad Foundation provides support to Education Week for coverage of personalized learning and system leadership; the Walton Family Foundation supports coverage of parent-empowerment issues.)

Common Goals

While Mr. Cunningham said the new group is not meant to be a policy organization, it lists areas of focus that appear to dovetail with goals of the three named funders: high expectations and rigorous standards for every student, accountability for principals and teachers in helping students meet those standards, and charter schools as a viable form of public school choice.

“For some time, we’ve been disappointed with the tone of the education debate, with a lot of name-calling and a lot of question of people’s motives,” said Bruce Reed, the president of the Broad Foundation and a former senior White House official under Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.

“We want to see a debate about what works in education,” said Mr. Reed, whose foundation funds many areas of education. “Most of the people in the organizations we work with are too busy starting schools or teaching kids to spend much time to take part in a policy debate about what they do.”

Mr. Cunningham said some of the new group’s work will be behind the scenes, drafting op-ed articles for policymakers, educators, and others, as well as providing strategic advice. But a more public effort will involve writing posts on the organization’s own blog and responding to public misconceptions.

“When we see people repeating things that are not true, we’ll try to challenge that,” he said.

The new organization, based in Chicago, has attracted two other former Duncan aides: Ann Whalen, who played a key role in programs such as Race to the Top, and Tracy Dell’Angela, who was the communications chief of the department’s Institute of Education Sciences. Russlyn Ali, who was the department’s assistant secretary for civil rights during the first Obama term, is on the fiduciary board of Education Post.

Mix of Reactions

Some professionals in education communications not affiliated with Education Post said they were a bit mystified about whether one more organization in the realm of education policy and ideas could significantly change the debate.

Sheppard Ranbom, the president of CommunicationWorks, a Washington-based public relations firm that focuses on education clients, said he was taken aback by the amount of money contributed to Education Post.

“We’re seeing far more money than ever introduced into education communications,” he said. “To be successful, this effort needs to show inclusiveness and truly bridge divides, and not just carry the views of any particular group of funders.”

Andrew J. Rotherham, the co-founder of the consulting firm Bellwether Education Partners, who has worked in education communications, said he thought the new effort was on the right track.

“What’s refreshing is that there is some transparency here” with Education Post and its goals and funders, he said. “I don’t understand when having [policy] goals became incompatible with having a civil conversation. There is no one in this entire debate [about improving schools] that doesn’t have views.”

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the September 10, 2014 edition of Education Week as Group Takes Aim at ‘Toxic Nature’ Of Nation’s Education Policy Debate

Events

School & District Management Live Event Education Week Leadership Symposium
Education Week's Premier Leadership Event for K12 School & District Leaders.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Law & Courts Webinar
The Future of Criminal Justice Reform: A Sphere Education Initiative Conversation
America’s criminal justice system is in crisis and calls for reform are dominating the national debate. Join Cato’s Sphere Education Initiative and Education Week for a webinar on criminal justice and policing featuring the nation’s
Content provided by Cato Institute
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Equity, Care and Connection: New SEL Tools and Practices to Support Students and Adults
As school districts plan to welcome students back into buildings for the upcoming school year, this is the perfect time to take a hard look at both our practices and our systems to build a
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Accountability Biden Education Team Squashes States' Push to Nix All Tests but Approves Other Flexibility
The department has telegraphed its decision to deny states' requests to cancel federally mandated tests for weeks.
3 min read
A first-grader learns keyboarding skills at Bayview Elementary School in San Pablo, Calif on March 12, 2015. Schools around the country are teaching students as young as 6 years old, basic typing and other keyboarding skills. The Common Core education standards adopted by a majority of states call for students to be able to use technology to research, write and give oral presentations, but the imperative for educators arrived with the introduction of standardized tests that are taken on computers instead of with paper and pencils.
The U.S. Department of Education denied some states' requests to cancel standardized tests this year. Others are seeking flexibility from some testing requirements, rather than skipping the assessments altogether.
Eric Risberg/AP
Accountability Explainer Will There Be Standardized Tests This Year? 8 Questions Answered
Educators want to know: Will the exams happen? If so, what will they look like, and how will the results be used?
12 min read
Students testing.
Getty
Accountability Opinion What Should School Accountability Look Like in a Time of COVID-19?
Remote learning is not like in person, and after nine months of it, data are revealing how harmful COVID-19 has been to children's learning.
6 min read
Image shows a speech bubble divided into 4 overlapping, connecting parts.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty and Laura Baker/Education Week
Accountability State Schools Chiefs Push Biden for Wiggle Room on Accountability During Pandemic
State schools chiefs say it's necessary to change how they use scores from mandated annual tests during the unprecedented disruption created by the coronavirus pandemic.
4 min read
Image of students taking a test.
smolaw11/iStock/Getty