Law & Courts

Missouri High Court to Hear Charter Dispute

By John Gehring — September 21, 2004 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The fate of the largest charter school in Kansas City, Mo., has reached the state’s highest court, as an unusual legal battle continues between the school and its sponsoring district.

At the heart of the case, scheduled to be heard this week by the Missouri Supreme Court, is whether the 30,000-student Kansas City school district was justified in seeking to end its four-year sponsorship of the Westport Community Charter School because of alleged financial, academic, and managerial problems.

A district review of the school this past spring cited, among other problems, a poor system for financial record-keeping and a poorly trained business office.

District leaders also argue that the charter school lacks an improvement plan, and that students would be better off if they were absorbed back into the district’s system of traditional schools. Charter schools are independent public schools that operate free from many district regulations.

The wrangling began in April, when the Kansas City school board voted not to renew its sponsorship of Westport, which enrolls 1,200 students in grades 6-12. Westport is the only charter school in Kansas City sponsored by the district.

Charter school officials sued the district, claiming that allegations of mismanagement were unproven and that the district hadn’t given Westport a chance to defend itself in a hearing.

A circuit court judge ruled in the charter school’s favor in June. But when the state Court of Appeals reversed that decision, a district locksmith entered the charter school on Aug. 19, in the middle of the night, to begin taking back the building.

The district owns the building that the charter school uses rent-free. Charter school officials showed up at the school early the next morning to find themselves locked out.

But members of Westport’s board of directors quickly sought and won an emergency injunction from the state supreme court, which ordered the district out of the charter school. The court agreed to hear arguments from both parties Sept. 8.

Allegations of Damage

The new school year began for Westport students on Aug. 23, despite more than $30,000 worth of alleged damage that charter school leaders claim the district caused when workers cut phone lines and made other physical changes in the school.

“There was a lot of damage done to the school,” said Curtis Masood, the vice president of the charter school’s board, who has called the legal dispute with the district a “bloody slugfest.”

“There is a lot of frustration and confusion about why the district is doing this,” Mr. Masood said.

Maurice Watson, a lawyer for the Kansas City schools, said the district was cooperating with Westport’s investigation of alleged damage at the school.

“At this point, the district sees further public conflict with Westport as an unnecessary and counterproductive distraction for students and staff at Westport,” he said.

But in an “open letter to the community,” posted on the district’s Web site on Aug. 27, Superintendent Bernard Taylor Jr. addressed the controversy.

“While the district has been forced to respond to the suit brought against it by Westport, the district has refrained from making false, personal, and malicious statements about Westport’s board and administrators,” the superintendent wrote.

“That this conflict, now in the courts,” he continued, “has become hostile is deeply disturbing. . Despite the difficulties that have ensued, I continue to believe the district is in the best position to improve the academic achievement of students at Westport.”

Charter school officials and the sponsors of Kansas City’s 17 other charter schools, with a total of 6,667 students, are watching the legal battle closely.

The case marks the first time in Missouri that a charter school board has sued its sponsor. Under state law, charter schools are allowed in the Kansas City and St. Louis school districts. Those districts—along with community colleges and four-year public colleges or universities—have the authority to sponsor charter schools.

A sponsor is responsible for overseeing the performance of a charter school, but does not make daily decisions about the school’s operations.

Charter school advocates such as Dave Camden, who directs the Missouri Charter School Information Center in St. Louis and helped craft the 1998 state charter school law, said most charter schools lack high-quality oversight.

“The majority of sponsors in the state have not done a good job monitoring their schools,” Mr. Camden said. “The fear now is that other sponsors will jump on the bandwagon and say this is our chance to get out.”

There is plenty of blame to go around in the fight between Westport and the Kansas City district, Mr. Camden added.

“What’s really unfortunate in this case is both the charter and the sponsor have both acted in a terrible fashion,” he said. “The school district just really didn’t know how to handle this, and at the same time, the charter board said, ‘That’s fine, we don’t want any oversight, and we will just run as far as we can with the ball before someone tackles us.’ ”

Preston C. Green III, an associate professor of education at Pennsylvania State University, said the Kansas City case raises an easily overlooked, but important, technical issue.

Kansas City officials have argued that they are not renewing, rather than revoking, its sponsorship of Westport. While there are guidelines under Missouri law for revoking a charter, there are no guidelines for not renewing a sponsorship. The fine distinction has become part of the complicated legal dispute in Kansas City.

“There are ways that the state legislature could fix this problem,” said Mr. Green. “The legislature could define what the standards are for renewal. Policymakers in the states should go back and check their statutes to make sure they have standards for revocation and renewal.”

Related Tags:

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Reflections on Evidence-Based Grading Practices: What We Learned for Next Year
Get real insights on evidence-based grading from K-12 leaders.
Content provided by Otus
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Creating Resilient Schools with a Trauma-Responsive MTSS
Join us to learn how school leaders are building a trauma-responsive MTSS to support students & improve school outcomes.
School & District Management Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: We Can’t Engage Students If They Aren’t Here: Strategies to Address the Absenteeism Conundrum
Absenteeism rates are growing fast. Join Peter DeWitt and experts to learn how to re-engage students & families.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Allows Trump Admin. to End Teacher-Prep Grants
The high court, over three justices' dissent, granted the administration's request to remove a lower court's block on ending the grants.
5 min read
Erin Huff, a kindergarten teacher at Waverly Elementary School, works with, from left to right, Ava Turner, a 2nd grader, Benton Ryan, 1st grade, and 3rd grader Haven Green, on estimating measurements using mini marshmallows in Waverly, Ill., on Dec. 18, 2019. Huff, a 24-year-old teacher in her third year, says relatively low pay, stress and workload often discourage young people from pursuing teaching degrees, leading to a current shortage of classroom teachers in Illinois. A nonprofit teacher-training program is using a $750,000 addition to the state budget to speed up certification to address a rampant teacher shortage.
Erin Huff, a 24-year-old kindergarten teacher at Waverly Elementary in Illinois, pictured here on Dec. 18, 2019, says low pay, high stress, and heavy workloads often discourage young people from entering teacher preparation programs. The U.S. Supreme Court on April 4, 2025, allowed the Trump administration to immediately terminate two federal teacher-preparation grant programs.
John O'Connor/AP
Law & Courts Groups Sue Over Trump's Cuts to Education Department Research Arm
This suit seeks the restoration of Institute of Education Sciences staff and contracts abruptly canceled by the Trump administration.
3 min read
Supporters gather outside the U.S. Department of Education in Washington to applaud Education Department employees as they depart their offices for the final time on Friday, March 28, 2025. The rally brought together education supporters, students, parents, and former employees to honor the departing staff as they arrived in 30-minute intervals to collect their belongings.
Supporters gather outside the U.S. Department of Education in Washington to applaud Education Department employees as they depart their offices for the final time on Friday, March 28, 2025. Two organizations representing researchers are suing the department in an attempt to restore the agency's data and research arm, the Institute of Education Sciences.
Moriah Ratner for Education Week
Law & Courts Supreme Court Appears Unlikely to Strike Down School E-Rate Program
The Supreme Court seems unlikely to strike down the E-rate program, though some justices questioned its funding structure and oversight.
5 min read
The Supreme Court in Washington, June 30, 2024.
The U.S. Supreme Court considers a major challenge to the E-rate program for school internet connections on March 26.
Susan Walsh/AP
Law & Courts Trump Asks Supreme Court for OK to Move Ahead With Deep Teacher-Training Cuts
The Trump administration on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to allow it to cut hundreds of millions of dollars for teacher training.
2 min read
President Donald Trump, left, holds up a signed executive order as young people hold up copies of the executive order they signed at an education event in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025.
President Donald Trump, left, holds up a signed executive order as young people hold up copies of the executive order they signed at an education event in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025. The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to permit the cut of funding for teacher training programs.
Ben Curtis/AP