Law & Courts

Military Recruitment Ignites an Arizona Rhetorical Firefight

By Katie Ash — September 10, 2007 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Exercising his own First Amendment rights, Arizona state schools Superintendent Tom Horne recently criticized opponents of military recruitment for targeting students with their message— and heard howls of protest in return.

During the first weeks of school in August, members of several activist groups— including the Arizona Advocacy Network Foundation, the Arizona Counter Recruitment Coalition, and Parents Against Violence in Education—stood outside Phoenix-area high schools to distribute preaddressed, postage-paid postcards that would require military recruiters to take students off their contact lists.

The No Child Left Behind Act requires schools that receive federal funding to provide contact information for each student to the U.S. armed forces. Parents can choose to keep their children’s names off the list.

Recruiters’ outreach to high school students has been controversial. Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Defense, responding to a lawsuit, clarified what kind of information could be collected and how students could remove their names from the database. (“Defense Dept. Settles Suit on Student-Recruiting Database,” Jan. 17, 2007.)

Mr. Horne, however, isn’t keen on activists walking high school students through that process. “To have adults teaching students to be hostile to the military institutions that defend our freedom is educationally dysfunctional,” the state chief said in a statement. “I urge these adults to look in the mirror and decide to do something constructive for education, rather than destructive.”

But his comments earned a tart response from activists.

“Most families had no idea this provision was included in the No Child Left Behind Act, and when they found out, they were appalled,” said Linda Brown, the executive director of the Arizona Advocacy Network Foundation of Phoenix.“We will continue to inform students and parents of their right to privacy.”

She said the superintendent distorted the groups’ message. “We have to respect young people’s abilities and intelligence,” she said. “If they’re given all the information, [they can] make choices that are in accordance with their values.”

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the September 12, 2007 edition of Education Week


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Well-Being Webinar
A Whole Child Approach to Supporting Positive Student Behavior 
To improve student behavior, it’s important to look at the root causes. Social-emotional learning may play a preventative role.

A whole child approach can proactively support positive student behaviors.

Join this webinar to learn how.
Content provided by Panorama
Recruitment & Retention Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Why Retaining Education Leaders of Color Is Key for Student Success
Today, in the United States roughly 53 percent of our public school students are young people of color, while approximately 80 percent of the educators who lead their classrooms, schools, and districts are white. Racial
Jobs January 2022 Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Blocks Biden Vaccine Mandate Applying to Schools in Much of the Country
The justices ruled 6-3 to stay an Occupational Health and Safety Administration rule that covered schools in 26 states and two territories.
4 min read
Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo last April.
The U.S. Supreme Court blocked a federal vaccine mandate for large employers, including school districts in about half the states.
Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP
Law & Courts Students Lose Appeal on Right to Civics Education, But Win Praise From Judges Anyway
A federal appellate court panel commended Rhode Island students for the novel effort, but said Supreme Court precedent stood in the way.
3 min read
Scales of justice and Gavel on wooden table and Lawyer or Judge working with agreement in Courtroom, Justice and Law concept.
Pattanaphong Khuankaew/iStock
Law & Courts High Court Appears Skeptical of Vaccine Mandate Covering Schools in Over Half the States
The Biden administration's OSHA rule applies to private employers with 100 or more workers, as well as school districts in 26 states.
4 min read
The Supreme Court shown Friday, Jan. 7, 2022, in Washington. The Supreme Court is taking up two major Biden administration efforts to bump up the nation's vaccination rate against COVID-19 at a time of spiking coronavirus cases because of the omicron variant.
The U.S. Supreme Court is weighing two Biden administration efforts to bump up the nation's vaccination rate against COVID-19.
Evan Vucci/AP
Law & Courts Federal Judge Blocks Biden's COVID Vaccine Mandate for Head Start Teachers
In a challenge by 24 states, the judge's preliminary injunction also blocks a mask mandate for Head Start students age 2 or older.
4 min read
COVID face masks and gavel
iStock/Getty Images Plus