Law & Courts

Justices Turn Down Case on Mich. Sports Seasons

By Mark Walsh — April 10, 2007 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The U.S. Supreme Court declined last week to hear the appeal of Michigan’s high school sports governing body in a case alleging discrimination by the group against girls in the scheduling of athletic seasons.

The court’s unanimous action on April 2 was not a ruling on the merits of the lawsuit, but it was the final buzzer in a legal contest that lasted nine years. The victor was a private group that argued in court documents that the Michigan High School Athletic Association “put the boys in the seasons that they and their coaches wanted and gave the girls the leftovers.”

Communities for Equity is a Grand Rapids, Mich.-based group that sued the MHSAA in 1998 for itself and on behalf of several parents and female high school athletes. The group argued in the suit that girls’ sports were held in seasons that were either nontraditional or otherwise disadvantageous, had shorter seasons than boys’ sports, and were sometimes assigned inferior facilities.

The group and the MHSAA entered into a consent decree on all issues except for the question of seasons. The advocates for girls’ sports argued, for example, that because Michigan girls played basketball in the fall instead of the traditional winter season, girls were at a disadvantage in being recruited for college.

A U.S. District Court judge in Kalamazoo, Mich., ruled for Communities for Equity in 2001, concluding that the unequal treatment of girls’ sports violated the equal-protection clause of the 14th Amendment, as well as a state civil rights law and Title IX of the federal Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibits discrimination based on sex in federally funded educational programs.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, in Cincinnati, affirmed the district court’s decision in 2004. But the next year, the Supreme Court tossed out the appellate ruling and ordered the 6th Circuit court to re-examine the case in light of a recent high court ruling about a broad federal civil rights statute. The justices essentially asked the 6th Circuit to consider whether plaintiffs in school-related sex-discrimination cases could assert claims under the U.S. Constitution as well as Title IX.

Taking a fresh look at the case, the 6th Circuit court ruled last year that the existence of a Title IX claim didn’t prevent the plaintiffs from raising constitutional claims, as well. The MHSAA appealed that ruling to the high court in Michigan High School Athletic Association v. Communities for Equity (Case No. 06-1038), but the justices declined without comment to review it.

Changes Start in Fall

John E. Roberts, the executive director of the MHSAA, acknowledged that the association’s defense of its sports schedule had reached the end of the line.

Girls’ Sports in Michigan

The U.S. Supreme Court last week declined to review lower-court rulings that held that the Michigan High School Athletic Association discriminated against girls in the scheduling of high school sports seasons. The sports at issue were:

BASKETBALL
Michigan girls play in the fall instead of the traditional winter season, which is when the state’s boys play. A federal district court said this meant missed opportunities to participate in “shootout” events and on “March Madness” tournament excitement that prevails in high school and college basketball at that time.

GOLF
Girls in Michigan’s Lower Peninsula play in the spring; boys in the fall. The court found this disadvantageous for girls because courses are in poor condition in the spring and girls face more competition with the public for tee times then.

SOCCER
Girls play in the spring; boys in the fall. While the district court acknowledged that 22 states schedule girls’ soccer in the spring, it ruled that Michigan girls were disadvantaged because fields are sometimes frozen at the beginning of the spring season, and the girls may have less exposure to college recruiters then.

SWIMMING AND DIVING
The Lower Peninsula girls’ season is in the fall; the boys’ season is in winter. The district court said this is a disadvantage because there is a long gap between the girls’ school season and national and amateur swim meets held in the spring.

TENNIS
Girls play in fall; boys in spring. The fall season is 20 days shorter and thus disadvantageous, the district court said.

VOLLEYBALL
The sport is not offered to Michigan high school boys, but despite a shortage of winter sports for girls, the district court said offering girls’ volleyball in the winter instead of fall put Michigan girls at a disadvantage in comparison with girls in other states, where the sport is typically played in fall.

SOURCE: Court documents

“It’s unfortunate at any time, much less at a time of such severe financial stress on our state and our school districts, that Michigan’s most efficient, fair, and proactive system for utilizing community resources must now be changed,” he said in a video from an April 2 news conference posted on the association’s Web site.

Beginning with the 2007-08 school year, the association will adjust seasons as ordered by the district court. Among the changes, girls’ basketball will move from fall to winter, and volleyball will move from winter to fall. Boys’ golf and girls’ tennis in Michigan’s Lower Peninsula will move from fall to spring, while girls’ golf and boys’ tennis in the Lower Peninsula will go from spring to fall.

“The court-ordered change means that thousands of boys and girls who had been planning on playing one combination of sports in high school will now find that combination impossible,” Mr. Roberts said.

But the lengthy court battle left an apt lesson, he said.

“You must accept the final result with grace,” Mr. Roberts said. “Accepting the result gracefully is what we expect of our student-athletes, and it is what we expect of ourselves now.”

Neena K. Chaudry, a lawyer with the National Women’s Law Center, in Washington, represented Communities for Equity and the parents and female athletes in the case. She said she hoped its conclusion “encourages schools to take a look at their own programs and make sure they are providing equal opportunities.”

“If they are approached by parents with complaints,” Ms. Chaudry said, “they should address them and correct them instead of fighting them in court for a decade.”

A version of this article appeared in the April 11, 2007 edition of Education Week as Justices Turn Down Case On Mich. Sports Seasons

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Budget & Finance Webinar
Innovative Funding Models: A Deep Dive into Public-Private Partnerships
Discover how innovative funding models drive educational projects forward. Join us for insights into effective PPP implementation.
Content provided by Follett Learning
Budget & Finance Webinar Staffing Schools After ESSER: What School and District Leaders Need to Know
Join our newsroom for insights on investing in critical student support positions as pandemic funds expire.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
How can districts build sustainable tutoring models before the money runs out?
District leaders, low on funds, must decide: broad support for all or deep interventions for few? Let's discuss maximizing tutoring resources.
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Turns Down Case Challenging School District's Transgender Policies
The case involves a policy allowing information to be withheld from parents considered not supportive of a gender-transitioning child.
3 min read
This Oct. 4, 2018, photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court at sunset in Washington. The Supreme Court has declined to take up an appeal from parents in Oregon who want to prevent transgender students from using locker rooms and bathrooms of the gender with which they identify, rather than their sex assigned at birth.
This Oct. 4, 2018, photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court at sunset in Washington. The court has declined to take up an appeal from parents in Maryland challenging a school district's policy on gender-support plans for students.
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
Law & Courts District Can Deny Opt-Outs on LGBTQ+ Books, Court Rules
Religious parents objected to a Maryland district's policy ending opt-outs for elementary school 'storybooks' with LGBTQ+ themes.
5 min read
A pedestrian passes by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Courthouse, June 16, 2021, on Main Street in Richmond, Va.
A person walks near the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit's courthouse in Richmond, Va. A panel of the court denied an injunction seeking to restore religious parents' opportunity to opt their children out of LGBTQ+ "storybooks" in a Maryland district.
Steve Helber/AP
Law & Courts Brown v. Board of Education: 70 Years of Progress and Challenges
The milestone for the historic 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down racial segregation in schools is marked by a range of tributes
12 min read
People mill around the third floor of the Kansas Statehouse in front of a Brown v. Board of Education mural before hearing from speakers recognizing the 70th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court case on April 29, 2024 in Topeka, Kan.
People mill around the third floor of the Kansas Statehouse in front of a Brown v. Board of Education mural before hearing from speakers recognizing the 70th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court case on April 29, 2024 in Topeka, Kan.
Evert Nelson/The Topeka Capital-Journal via AP
Law & Courts Republican-Led States Sue to Block New Title IX Rule
A pair of lawsuits focus on the rule's protections for students' gender identity.
5 min read
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus. Four Republican-led states filed a lawsuit Monday challenging the Biden administration's new Title IX regulation, which among other things would codify protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus. Four Republican-led states filed a lawsuit Monday challenging the Biden administration's new Title IX regulation, which among other things would codify protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Patrick Orsagos/AP