Federal

House Plan Slashes Aid for Education Shows on Public TV

By Vaishali Honawar — June 21, 2005 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Democrats in Congress and supporters of public broadcasting say that pure politics, rather than budget considerations, led a congressional subcommittee to approve deep budget cuts to public television and radio this month. The plan includes the elimination of a Department of Education program that helps seed children’s educational TV shows.

“There are those in Congress who’ve wanted to eliminate public broadcasting for a long time, and the horrible deficit situation plus the perception that public broadcasting is divided right now has created an opportunity in their eyes to act now,” said John Lawson, the president of the Association of Public Television Stations, a Washington lobbying group for individual stations.

Under the cuts approved June 9 by the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes federal money to public-television and -radio outlets, would decrease from $400 million this year to $300 million in fiscal 2006, which begins Oct. 1. The CPB provides a foundation of funding for basic operations for many stations, which allows them to pay dues for national programs that include the most popular educational shows.

The subcommittee’s bill also eliminated entirely the $23 million Ready to Learn program in the Education Department, which helps pay for a slate of popular children’s educational shows including “Clifford the Big Red Dog,” “Sesame Street,” and “Postcards from Buster,” which drew criticism from Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings earlier this year over an episode featuring two families headed by lesbian couples.

The full appropriations committee, which met June 16, approved all the cuts for fiscal 2006, but also approved an amendment from Rep. David R. Obey, D-Wis., to restore funding for fiscal 2008 that had been left out from the bill.

Since 1976, public broadcasting has been “forward funded” by two years to “provide a degree of insulation from the political currents of the day,” Mr. Lawson said.

Pat Mitchell, the president of the Public Broadcasting Service, said the cuts, if passed by the full Congress, could have a “severely detrimental effect” on children’s and prime-time programming.

Rep. Ralph Regula, R-Ohio, the chairman of the subcommittee, said in a statement that its members had to make “tough choices by reconciling competing priorities with the resources available.”

“Choices are easy when dollars are plentiful, but that was not the case this year,” he said.

Political Interference

Kenneth Y. Tomlinson, an appointee of President Clinton’s to the CPB board, was named its chairman by President Bush in 2003. He vowed to rid public television of what he said was a perception that it was not politically balanced.

Some of his decisions since, including the hiring of a consultant to investigate the ideological leanings of the guests on one popular news show, have raised concerns of editorial freedom among public television officials.

Mr. Lawson said that the controversy over “Postcards from Buster” may have played into the decision to cut public-broadcasting funds.

“I know that there were some in Congress who were upset that PBS even considered airing a program that included a family headed by two mommies,” he said.

Mr. Tomlinson was not available for an interview, but in a statement posted on the CPB’s Web site, he expressed concern over the cuts.

“We will be joining with our colleagues in the public-broadcasting community to make the case for a higher level of funding as the appropriations measure makes its way through Congress,” he said.

Ms. Mitchell said in an interview that programs such as Ready to Learn are helping children learn to read, and helping their parents, caregivers and teachers prepare youngsters for success in school. (“Federal Grant Boosts Educational Television, Faces Fresh Scrutiny,” Feb. 9, 2005.)

“All of public broadcasting is working very hard right now to remind Congress how our programming and services support, rather than compete with, congressional priorities,” she said.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Measuring What Matters: How District Leaders Are Redefining Student Assessment
In this panel discussion, district leaders and systems experts will examine the gap between the outcomes we want and the systems in place.
Content provided by Otus
Early Childhood Webinar Selling Into Early Learning: New Survey Data and Strategies for Marketers
Selling into PreK? Get fresh EdWeek Research Center data and strategies to position your products and reach the right early learning buyers.
Artificial Intelligence Webinar AI and 'Techlash' Are on a Collision Course. How Should Schools Respond?
Learn what strategies and tactics schools can develop to encourage smart and responsible AI use, while also enforcing tech guardrails.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Opinion Margaret Spellings and Arne Duncan: The Ed. Agenda We Can Agree On
We need to get education back on track, write the former Ed. Secretaries. Let’s start at the top.
Margaret Spellings & Arne Duncan
•
5 min read
Government research, State budgets, public education, back on track, Education Agenda
Vanessa Solis/Education Week + Getty
Federal Q&A A Top Democrat Breaks Down His Party's Plans for K-12 in a House Majority
If Democrats retake the House, Rep. Bobby Scott may be in a position to set his chamber’s K-12 agenda.
5 min read
Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., speaks during a prayer vigil held by the Chesapeake Coalition of Black Pastors at The Mount (Mount Lebanon Baptist Church) in Chesapeake, Va., Sunday, Nov. 27, 2022, for the six people killed at a Walmart in Chesapeake, Va., when a manager opened fire with a handgun before an employee meeting Tuesday night.
Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., speaks during a prayer vigil in Chesapeake, Va., on Nov. 27, 2022. Scott is the ranking Democrat on the U.S. House of Representatives' education committee and will seek the panel's chairmanship if Democrats win a House majority in next month's elections.
Carolyn Kaster/AP
Federal What a Democratic Congress Could Mean for Trump's K-12 Agenda
They may try to reverse—or at least investigate—the Trump admin.'s efforts to dismantle the Ed. Dept.
9 min read
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the top Democrat in the Republican-majority House, is joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., chair of the House Democratic Caucus, as they criticize President Donald Trump and his policies while talking to reporters about the approaching midterm election, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2026.
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks at the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 17, 2026. He's joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., who chairs the House Democratic Caucus. If Democrats gain a majority of either chamber of Congress after next month's elections, they'll be able to hold oversight hearings on and launch investigations into the dismantling of the U.S. Department of Education.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Federal The Future of Education Research: More Partisan and Largely Left to States?
As Trump administration works to change federal grants, outside researchers try to regroup.
6 min read
Image of file folders with tabs called "funding" "grants" "projects" and a blank note paper paperclipped to the outside.
Collage by Laura Baker/Education Week + Getty