Law & Courts

High Court Rejects Case on Title IX

By Caroline Hendrie — June 14, 2005 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The U.S. Supreme Court last week let stand an appellate-court decision throwing out a lawsuit that blamed the Department of Education’s rules against sex discrimination for cuts to men’s college-sports teams that allegedly were unfair to male athletes.

A federal appeals court in Washington last year ruled against a coalition led by the National Wrestling Coaches Association that had challenged some of the Education Department’s rules for enforcing Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.

In a 2-1 ruling in May 2004, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the disputed rules were not directly to blame for cuts to men’s teams in various sports, chiefly wrestling, at colleges since the 1980s.

Instead, the coaches’ real beef should be with those institutions, which the appeals court said have flexibility in how to comply with the regulations. (“Wrestling Coaches Lose Appeal Over Ed. Dept.’s Title IX Rules,” May 26, 2004.)

On June 6, the Supreme Court declined without comment to take up the plaintiffs’ appeal in National Wrestling Coaches Association v. Department of Education (Case No. 04-922).

“They don’t reverse every case that’s decided in error,” said Lawrence J. Joseph, a Washington lawyer representing the plaintiffs.

But the National Women’s Law Center, which backed the federal government’s position, said it hoped the high court’s action meant that the “last word on this case has been spoken.”

“It’s high time the wrestlers stopped using this important law as a scapegoat for their own problems,” said Marcia D. Greenberger, the co-president of the Washington-based center.

Rematch Coming?

But Mr. Joseph said the plaintiffs were not giving up. He said they have another case pending against the Education Department over the agency’s rejection of a formal request to revise the Title IX rules.

In addition to the original coaches and alumni groups, that second case includes some new plaintiffs, including a high school wrestling club from Pennsylvania.

The association’s first suit challenged Education Department’s 1979 and 1996 guidance on Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in education programs receiving federal funds.

The rules allow colleges to prove compliance by providing athletic opportunities for men and women in numbers proportionate to their enrollments, among other steps. Institutions can eliminate teams or limit their rosters to achieve such balance under the rules.

Related Tags:

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Classroom Technology Webinar
Seamless Integrations for Engagement in the Classroom
Learn how to seamlessly integrate new technologies into your classroom to support student engagement. 
Content provided by GoGuardian
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Recruitment & Retention Webinar
Be the Change: Strategies to Make Year-Round Hiring Happen
Learn how to leverage actionable insights to diversify your recruiting efforts and successfully deploy a year-round recruiting plan.
Content provided by Frontline
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Critical Ways Leaders Can Build a Culture of Belonging and Achievement
Explore innovative practices for using technology to build an environment of belonging and achievement for all staff and students.
Content provided by DreamBox Learning

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts A School Librarian Pushes Back on Censorship and Gets Death Threats and Online Harassment
Amanda Jones lost her legal battle against online harassers this week but vows to continue to press her case.
7 min read
Amanda Jones, a librarian in Livingston Parish, La., pictured on Sept. 13, 2022. Jones is suing members of a Facebook group who harassed her virtually after she spoke against censorship in a public library meeting. Jones received angry emails and even a death threat from people across the country after she filed the lawsuit.
Amanda Jones, a librarian in Livingston Parish, La., is suing members of a Facebook group who harassed her virtually after she spoke against censorship in a public library meeting.
Claire Bangser for Education Week
Law & Courts Affirmative Action Cases Lead What Could Prove Another Momentous Supreme Court Term
The cases on race in college admissions could affect K-12. The justices will also weigh copyright, American Indian law, and LGBTQ rights.
7 min read
The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, Monday, June 27, 2022.
The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, Monday, June 27, 2022.
Patrick Semansky/AP
Law & Courts As Rhetoric Heats Up, Many Parents Fear Politicians Are Using Children As ‘Political Pawns’
Not all parents buy the rationale policymakers have offered for limiting discussions of race and LGBTQ issues in school.
3 min read
Image of a book with a blue and red pen.
Laura Baker/Education Week and iStock/Getty
Law & Courts School Districts' Legal Battle With Juul Isn't Over
States recent settlement with the vape company doesn't end districts separate lawsuits.
5 min read
A Juul electronic cigarette starter kit at a smoke shop in New York on Dec. 20, 2018. In a deal announced Tuesday, Sept. 6, 2022, electronic cigarette maker Juul Labs will pay nearly $440 million to settle a two-year investigation by 33 states into the marketing of its high-nicotine vaping products, which have long been blamed for sparking a national surge in teen vaping.
The electronic cigarette company Juul will pay nearly $440 million to settle an investigation by 33 states into the marketing of its products, blamed for a national surge in teen vaping.
Seth Wenig/AP