Law & Courts

Florida Vouchers Dealt Another Legal Blow

By Joetta L. Sack — November 23, 2004 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

For the third time, a Florida court has struck down the state’s best-known voucher program, calling it unconstitutional because it allows students to attend religious schools with taxpayer money—a violation, the court said, of the state constitution.

The latest blow to the 5-year-old Opportunity Scholarship program was dealt Nov. 12 by the full panel of the 1st District Court of Appeal in Tallahassee, which voted 8-5, with one abstention, to uphold an August decision by a three-member panel of that court that found the program unconstitutional. (“Florida Weighs Impact of Ruling Against Voucher Program,” Sept. 1, 2004.) The latest ruling puts the future of the voucher program, which now gives state-financed tuition vouchers of up to $3,900 to about 690 students, in further doubt.

The ruling disappointed Gov. Jeb Bush, a Republican who has been the program’s chief proponent. Although he plans to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Florida, it is unclear whether that highest state court will hear it.

Jacob DiPietre, a spokesman for Mr. Bush, said that the governor was committed to fighting for the program, and was heartened by the votes of the five judges in the minority.

“It’s unfortunate that there are those who continue to try to deny the predominantly poor and minority parents the rights to choose the schools that their children attend,” Mr. DiPietre said.

But the state’s main teachers’ union and advocates for strict separation of church and state were happy.

“This is now the third court that has shown that the voucher law that was passed is unconstitutional; it’s to the point where the governor seems to be delaying the inevitable,” said Mark Pudlow, the spokesman for the Florida Education Association, a 122,000-member affiliate of both the National Education Association and American Federation of Teachers.

“I hope Governor Bush and state legislators get the message that you can’t force Florida taxpayers to support religion,” Barry W. Lynn, the executive director of the Washington-based Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said in a written statement.

Mr. Pudlow said his union is concerned that more students each year are receiving the vouchers and enrolling in private schools while the case goes through the court system. The students have been allowed to continue receiving and using the scholarships while the case is under litigation. That could cause significant upheaval, he said, if the final verdict strikes down the law, a decision he said he expects in the coming months.

Awaiting Final Ruling

“That’s part of [Gov. Bush’s] strategy, to string this out in courts as long as possible,” Mr. Pudlow added. “It doesn’t seem like it’s very responsible governing.”

In the most recent decision, the judges writing the majority opinion held that a 1885 provision in the Florida Constitution prohibits taxpayer funds from going toward the direct or indirect aid of any religious institution.

But the dissenting judges argued that the state constitution does not set a higher bar than the U.S. Constitution, in a reference to the 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding the Cleveland voucher program, which provides publicly financed tuition aid that students can use at religious and other private schools.

The Florida appellate judges in the majority saluted the voucher program’s goal of giving better educational opportunities to “children trapped in substandard schools.”

“Nevertheless, the courts do not have the authority to ignore the clear language of the [state] Constitution, even for a popular program with a worthy purpose,” the majority wrote in its decision this month.

State legislators enacted the Opportunity Scholarship program in 1999 to offer tuition aid to help students in failing public schools transfer, whether to religious schools, other private schools, or out-of-district public schools. About half the recipients have enrolled in religiously based schools.

The program is open to students who attend schools that receive two failing grades on state report cards within a four-year period. That criterion means that only students from a handful of schools are likely to be eligible. Participation in the program increased slightly to some 690 students in about 20 failing schools this year, according to the governor’s office. About 660 students received the vouchers last year.

An ultimate decision in the case by Florida’s high court could also affect the state’s McKay Scholarships, which go to about 12,000 special education students. Many education groups expect that voucher foes could use a final ruling against the Opportunity Scholarships to challenge the constitutionality of the McKay program as well.

A version of this article appeared in the November 24, 2004 edition of Education Week as Florida Vouchers Dealt Another Legal Blow

Events

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Teens Drop Lawsuit Against Trump's Trans Sports Order After Supreme Court Ruling
The Supreme Court last month upheld state bans on transgender girls in school sports.
4 min read
Two teens challenging New Hampshire's new law banning transgender girls from girls' sports teams, Parker Tirrell, third from left, and Iris Turmelle, sixth from left, pose with their families and attorneys in Concord, N.H., Aug. 19, 2024.
Parker Tirrell, third from left, and Iris Turmelle, sixth from left, pose with their families and attorneys in Concord, N.H., Aug. 19, 2024. The teens initially sued over New Hampshire's law banning transgender girls from school sports teams, and later expanded their lawsuit to challenge President Donald Trump's February 2025 executive order threatening to withhold federal funds from schools that allow transgender girls to join girls' sports teams. They've since withdrawn the legal challenge following a Supreme Court ruling allowing states to ban transgender girls from sports under Title IX.
Holly Ramer/AP
Law & Courts What Schools Need to Know About the Supreme Court’s Transgender Sports Ruling
The justices upheld two state laws that bar transgender girls from participating in female sports.
10 min read
A group prays outside of the Supreme Court ahead of the court's ruling on whether transgender girls and women can play on school athletic teams, on June 30, 2026, on Capitol Hill in Washington.
A group prays outside of the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of the court's ruling on whether transgender girls and women can play on school athletic teams, on June 30, 2026, in Washington. The court upheld two state laws barring transgender girls from joining girls' school sports teams.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Law & Courts Judges Strike Down Trump Admin.'s Student Loan Forgiveness Overhaul
Two judges sided with advocates who said the program risked becoming a tool for political retribution.
3 min read
In this May 5, 2018, file photo, graduates at the University of Toledo commencement ceremony in Toledo, Ohio.
Graduates at the University of Toledo commencement ceremony in Toledo, Ohio, on May 5, 2018. Two judges have ruled against the Trump administration's overhaul of a public service loan forgiveness program for which teachers have qualified.
Carlos Osorio/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Rejecting Trump's Proposed Limits
The justices relied on the 14th Amendment and federal law to rule that anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen.
4 min read
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The Supreme Court justices will take the bench Monday, July 1, 2024, to release their last few opinions of the term, including their most closely watched case: whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from criminal prosecution.
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito, and Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The high court, on June 30, 2026, rejected President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP