Law & Courts

Federal Appeals Court Says Arkansas District Flouted Order on Prayer

By Andrew Trotter — April 18, 2006 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A federal appeals court has upheld a lower-court ruling finding an Arkansas school district in contempt of a 2004 court order not to orchestrate or supervise prayers at school graduation or baccalaureate ceremonies.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, in St. Louis, found that a baccalaureate service at De Valls Bluff High School in spring 2005 clearly violated a federal district court’s injunction.

“The [school district] contends that the baccalaureate service was a student-organized event, but there was ample evidence on the record to demonstrate that school employees were involved with almost every aspect of the service’s preparation,” the court panel said in a unanimous opinion on April 4.

The court noted that two school employees serving as senior-class sponsors met with students during school hours to plan the baccalaureate service. They also supervised and advised the planning; produced and copied the program for the service, using school resources; and handed out copies of the program at the service.

But the court stopped short of imposing a penalty on the 5,900-student De Valls Bluff school district, beyond a warning to desist or face more severe sanctions.

Steve Warnock, a former teacher at De Valls Bluff High who had attended the service, had asked the courts to fine the school district. Mr. Warnock brought the initial lawsuit two years ago, after he attended mandatory faculty meetings and compulsory in-service training at which prayers were held.

A federal district court had barred the school district from offering prayers at any meeting that Mr. Warnock was required to attend. On appeal, however, the 8th Circuit court barred the district from engaging in religious activity involving any teachers, not just Mr. Warnock.

In the 2004 appellate opinion, U.S. Circuit Judge Morris S. Arnold wrote: “We believe that it is the government’s endorsement of a particular religious message that constitutes the constitutional violation here.”

Events

School Climate & Safety K-12 Essentials Forum Strengthen Students’ Connections to School
Join this free event to learn how schools are creating the space for students to form strong bonds with each other and trusted adults.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Math for All: Strategies for Inclusive Instruction and Student Success
Looking for ways to make math matter for all your students? Gain strategies that help them make the connection as well as the grade.
Content provided by NMSI
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Equity and Access in Mathematics Education: A Deeper Look
Explore the advantages of access in math education, including engagement, improved learning outcomes, and equity.
Content provided by MIND Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Declines to Hear School District's Transgender Restroom Case
The case asked whether federal law protects transgender students on the use of school facilities that correspond to their gender identity.
4 min read
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Law & Courts What a Proposed Ban on AI-Assisted ‘Deep Fakes’ Would Mean for Cyberbullying
Students who create AI-generated, intimate images of their classmates would be breaking federal law, if a new bill is enacted.
2 min read
AI Education concept in blue: A robot hand holding a pencil.
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts Supreme Court Declines Case on Corporal Punishment for Student With Autism
The justices refused to hear the appeal of an 11-year-old Louisiana student who alleges that two educators slapped her on her wrists.
3 min read
The Supreme Court building is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 10, 2023.
The Supreme Court building is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 10, 2023.
Patrick Semansky/AP
Law & Courts U.S. Supreme Court Declines Bid to Rename 'Brown v. Board of Education'
Descendants argued that their case, not the one from Topeka, Kan., should have topped the 1954 decision on racial segregation in schools.
3 min read
Linda Brown Smith stands in front of the Sumner School in Topeka, Kan., on May 8, 1964. The refusal of the public school to admit Brown in 1951, then nine years old, because she is black, led to the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the "separate but equal" clause and mandated that schools nationwide must be desegregated.
Linda Brown Smith stands in front of the Sumner School in Topeka, Kan., in 1964, a segregated white school where she had been denied enrollment in 1951, leading to the landmark 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down the "separate but equal" doctrine in the case that bears her family name, <i>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.</i> The high court on Jan. 8 turned away an effort by descendants of the litigants in a companion desegregation case from South Carolina to rename the historic decision for their case, <i>Briggs</i> v. <i>Elliott</i>.
AP