Law & Courts

Democratic Bill Aims to Put Brakes on Restraint and Seclusion Practices

By Andrew Ujifusa — November 27, 2018 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Democrats on Capitol Hill are seeking to ban the practice of isolating students in special rooms or otherwise secluding them in schools that receive federal funds, as well as to limit when students can be physically restrained.

The Keeping All Students Safe Act would also require schools to notify parents within 24 hours when their child has been physically restrained and require states to collect and publish data on restraint and seclusion, including reports of injuries or death.

Rep. Bobby Scott of Virginia, the top Democrat on the House education committee who is poised to become the panel’s chairman next year, and Rep. Don Beyer, another Virginia Democrat, are the authors of the bill. Democratic Sens. Patty Murray of Washington state and Chris Murphy of Connecticut are slated to introduce a companion bill in the Senate. (Murray is the top Democrat on the Senate education committee.)

Restraint and seclusion is a particularly big issue in the special education community, although a House Democratic aide indicated the lawmakers’ ongoing concern about the issue extends beyond students with disabilities. Advocates say that the official statistics about the restraint and seclusion of students almost certainly underestimate the true number of such incidents, and that many of the practices lead to long-term trauma as well as physical injuries. Educators say it’s a difficult issue for them, because they must sometimes balance the need for safe and secure classrooms with the health and welfare of some of their most vulnerable students.

An Education Week analysis found that close to 70,000 special education students, or one out of 100, were restrained or secluded in public schools in the 2013-14 school year, or about one 1 of every 100 of those students. That analysis was based on the federal Civil Rights Data Collection from the 2013-14 school year that’s based on district-reported information.

Chance for Headway

The bill, introduced Nov. 14, isn’t the first education legislation Democrats are introducing as the party in control of the House—that turnover won’t happen until January, when this Congress leaves office. And it doesn’t have a great chance of passing by any stretch in this lame-duck period of Congress. But the Democrats plan to reintroduce the bill when the next Congress starts in January, and clearly, it’s an issue on which they think they can make at least some political headway.

About 30 states now have policies designed to limit the use of restraint and seclusion, a number that’s been growing in recent years.

“Every school should be a safe and welcoming place where all students can get a quality education. Unfortunately, thousands of students are still subjected to dangerous seclusion and restraint practices, which research shows make schools less safe,” Scott said in a statement. “While it is encouraging that some states have begun to prohibit or limit the use of seclusion and restraint, it is important that Congress pass the Keeping All Students Safe Act, which would establish a nationwide minimum safety standard. Moreover, this legislation would provide states and teachers the support they need to improve their schools’ culture by using “evidence-based interventions.”

The Every Student Succeeds Act also requires states to show how they plan to reduce “aversive behavioral interventions.”

Continued Push

A version of this proposal was first introduced by Democrats in 2009, and lawmakers have proposed it in subsequent years without success—legislation came close to passing in 2010. Democrats’ concerns also are rooted in racial disparities: A 2009 Government Accountability Office report that led to the original bill found that restraint and seclusion practices were used disproportionately on students of color. Congress has asked for an update to that GAO report.

In addition, the Keeping All Students Safe Act would:

• Prohibit the use of physical restraints, except to protect other students and staff;

• Ban the use of chemical and mechanical restraints, and physical restraints that affect breathing;

• Outlaw the use of physical restraint as a planned intervention; and

• Require staff members to be certified before they use physical restraint under minimum standards.

A version of this article appeared in the November 28, 2018 edition of Education Week as Democratic Bill Aims to Put Brakes on Restraint and Seclusion Practices

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Recruitment & Retention Webinar
Be the Change: Strategies to Make Year-Round Hiring Happen
Learn how to leverage actionable insights to diversify your recruiting efforts and successfully deploy a year-round recruiting plan.
Content provided by Frontline
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Critical Ways Leaders Can Build a Culture of Belonging and Achievement
Explore innovative practices for using technology to build an environment of belonging and achievement for all staff and students.
Content provided by DreamBox Learning
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Professional Development Webinar
Strategies for Improving Student Outcomes with Teacher-Student Relationships
Explore strategies for strengthening teacher-student relationships and hear how districts are putting these methods into practice to support positive student outcomes.
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Maine Opts Out of $440M Multistate Settlement With Juul
Maine was not willing to agree to Juul's condition that would have barred school districts from suing the company.
1 min read
A cashier displays a packet of tobacco-flavored Juul pods at a store in San Francisco on June 17, 2019.
A cashier displays a packet of tobacco-flavored Juul pods at a store in San Francisco on June 17, 2019.
Samantha Maldonado/AP
Law & Courts Maine OKs First Religious School for Tuition Reimbursement
A Supreme Court ruling had ordered the state to treat religious schools the same as other private schools regarding tuition reimbursement.
1 min read
The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, Monday, June 27, 2022.
The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, Monday, June 27, 2022.
Patrick Semansky/AP
Law & Courts A School Librarian Pushes Back on Censorship and Gets Death Threats and Online Harassment
Amanda Jones lost her legal battle against online harassers this week but vows to continue to press her case.
7 min read
Amanda Jones, a librarian in Livingston Parish, La., pictured on Sept. 13, 2022. Jones is suing members of a Facebook group who harassed her virtually after she spoke against censorship in a public library meeting. Jones received angry emails and even a death threat from people across the country after she filed the lawsuit.
Amanda Jones, a librarian in Livingston Parish, La., is suing members of a Facebook group who harassed her virtually after she spoke against censorship in a public library meeting.
Claire Bangser for Education Week
Law & Courts Affirmative Action Cases Lead What Could Prove Another Momentous Supreme Court Term
The cases on race in college admissions could affect K-12. The justices will also weigh copyright, American Indian law, and LGBTQ rights.
7 min read
The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, Monday, June 27, 2022.
The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, Monday, June 27, 2022.
Patrick Semansky/AP