Law & Courts

Court OKs Ky. District’s Dress Code

February 15, 2005 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A federal appeals court last week upheld against a First Amendment challenge a Kentucky school district’s student dress code that prohibits many fashions popular with teenagers and preteens: baggy pants, bluejeans, “distressed” clothing, unnaturally colored hair, and body piercings except those in ears.

The policy of the 2,300-student Fort Thomas district near Cincinnati was challenged in 2001 by lawyer Robert E. Blau on behalf of his daughter, Amanda, who was then a 6th grader.

Their suit said Ms. Blau opposed the dress code because she wanted to wear clothes that “look nice on her” and that “she feels good in.”

Many of the school’s students “looked like rows of corn” under the dress code, Mr. Blau said in an interview. The district’s dress code was “taking away a child’s right to wear clothing of their [generation’s] age” and suppressing their individuality, he said.

But both a federal district judge in Kentucky and a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, in Cincinnati, rejected the family’s challenge.

The appeals court panel ruled unanimously on Feb. 8 that the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech did not cover the family’s claim because Ms. Blau was seeking protection for “a generalized and vague desire to express her middle school individuality” and not any particular message.

“The First Amendment does not protect such vague and attenuated notions of expression—namely, self-expression through any and all clothing that a 12-year-old may wish to wear on a given day,” said the opinion by U.S. Circuit Judge Jeffery S. Sutton.

‘Sense of Individuality’

The district’s goals in adopting the dress code in 2001—such as improving the learning environment and helping bridge socioeconomic differences between families—did not regulate any viewpoint and furthered important governmental interests, the opinion said.

The court also rejected a claim by Mr. Blau that the dress code interfered with his right to direct the upbringing of his child. Judge Sutton said that while parents may decide whether to send their children to public schools, they don’t have a right to direct how school authorities handle matters such as a dress code.

Mr. Blau said last week that he plans to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

“Clothing is an expression in and of itself,” he said. “When everyone looks the same, they start acting the same, and you lose your sense of individuality.”

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the February 16, 2005 edition of Education Week as Court OKs Ky. District’s Dress Code


Classroom Technology Webinar Building Better Blended Learning in K-12 Schools
The pandemic and the increasing use of technology in K-12 education it prompted has added renewed energy to the blended learning movement as most students are now learning in school buildings (and will likely continue

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Weighs a Type of Damages Schools Can Face in Civil Rights Lawsuits
The issue involves compensation for "emotional distress," and the case holds implications for suits brought under Title IX and other laws.
6 min read
Crumpled Up Dollar Bill
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Law & Courts Opinion What the Law Says About Parents' Rights Over Schooling
The rallying cry of “parental freedom” perpetuated racial segregation, writes a legal scholar. So why would we let it dictate curriculum?
Joshua Weishart
5 min read
People hold signs and chant during a meeting of the North Allegheny School District school board regarding the district's mask policy, at at North Allegheny Senior High School in McCandless, Pa., on Aug. 25, 2021. A growing number of school board members across the U.S. are resigning or questioning their willingness to serve as meetings have devolved into shouting contests over contentious issues including masks in schools.
People at a school board meeting in late August protest the mask policy set by the North Allegheny school district in Western Pennsylvania.
Alexandra Wimley/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette via AP
Law & Courts Justice Dept. to Pay $127.5M to Parkland Massacre Victims' Families
Attorneys for 16 of the 17 killed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland said they had reached a confidential monetary settlement.
Terry Spencer, Miami Herald
2 min read
In this Feb. 15, 2018, file photo, law enforcement officers block off the entrance to Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., following a deadly shooting at the school.
In this Feb. 15, 2018, file photo, law enforcement officers block off the entrance to Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., following a deadly shooting at the school.
Wilfredo Lee/AP Photo
Law & Courts Can Public Money Go to Religious Schools? A Divisive Supreme Court Case Awaits
The justices will weigh Maine's exclusion of religious schools from its "tuitioning" program for students from towns without high schools.
13 min read
The Carson family pictured outside Bangor Christian School in Bangor, Maine on Nov. 5, 2021.
Institute for Justice senior attorney Michael E. Bindas, left, accompanies Amy and David Carson who flank their daughter, Olivia, outside Bangor Christian Schools in Maine in early November. The Carsons are one of two families seeking to make religious schools eligible for Maine's tuition program for students from towns without high schools.
Linda Coan O’Kresik for Education Week