Conservative Backlash Pushes Biden Administration to Dissolve New National Parent Council

By Libby Stanford — December 06, 2022 | Updated: December 06, 2022 6 min read
U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona talks during a roundtable with School District of Philadelphia officials, the principal, a teacher, and a parent at the Olney Elementary School Annex in North Philadelphia on Tuesday, April 6, 2021.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Biden administration has dissolved its new parent and family engagement council less than six months after its inception, following conservative lawmakers’ and advocacy groups’ claims that the council was one-sided and unlawful.

The U.S. Department of Education’s National Parent and Family Engagement Council originally set out to help families engage with school districts at the local level when it was created in June. But it came under scrutiny by conservative lawmakers and became the subject of a lawsuit from conservative parent advocacy groups, who claimed it was created with a liberal bias.

The department disagrees with the criticisms, according to a statement issued on Dec. 5, but has decided to disband the council anyway.

“We all share a vital concern for the future of our students, and our nation, regardless of our political, social, or cultural backgrounds,” the statement said. “Parents and families have a critical role to play in building a brighter future for our kids and our communities—the Department has always tried to hear from as many parents as possible and to engage with them in the most meaningful and effective way.”

The decision was celebrated by some as a victory for conservative lawmakers and parent groups, while those who planned to participate in the council viewed it as a step backward.

“It would be laughable if this was not just so pathetic, so status quo, and we weren’t in such a critical moment for our children right now,” said Keri Rodrigues, the co-founder and president of the National Parents Union, one of the groups involved in the council.

Allegations of bias

Fourteen education organizations made up the council, including the National Parents Union, the National Parent Teacher Association, and UnidosUS, a Latino civil rights organization. It didn’t include notable conservative parents’ rights groups like Parents Defending Education, Fight for Schools and Families, and Moms for Liberty. Both Fight for Schools and Families and Moms for Liberty have political action committees that campaign for conservative-leaning candidates.

The composition of the council raised alarm bells for conservative politicians and education advocates, who felt their voices weren’t represented on it. All of the groups on the council claim to be nonpartisan, but a few, including the National Parents Union, the League of United Latin American Citizens, and UnidosUS, are more liberal-leaning and political in their work. Others—like Girls Inc., Fathers Incorporated, and the National Military Family Association—generally don’t advocate for political campaigns and focus instead on services and programs for their members.

In July, two conservative parents’ rights groups—Parents Defending Education and Fight for Schools and Families—alongside America First Legal, a conservative legal nonprofit, sued the council, the Education Department, and Education Secretary Miguel Cardona for violating the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which says that an advisory committee’s membership should be “fairly balanced in terms of the points of view represented.”

The groups withdrew the lawsuit Dec. 5 after the department announced it would disband the council.

Last week, a group of five Republican U.S. Senators sent a letter to Cardona and the Education Department criticizing the council for being biased and requesting more information about the council. The Senators, which included Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, and Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., asked that the department clarify whether the council required representatives to be parents and asked if the department planned to ensure that not all of the representatives of the council voted for President Joe Biden in the 2020 election.

“Most, if not all, of these organizations are liberal advocacy groups that seek to nationalize our education systems into a one-size-fits-all system while eliminating parental choice and leaving the individual needs of our children behind,” the senators wrote.

The groups involved in the council disagree with that characterization. The National Association for Family, School, and Community Engagement, a nonpartisan membership organization dedicated to parent and family engagement and one of the 14 organizations involved in the council, gave recommendations to the Education Department of other groups that should be involved. None of those recommendations were based on political agendas of any kind, NAFSCE’s Executive Director Vito Borrello said.

“We advanced recommendations of who [we thought] were doing great work that should be considered to be represented,” Borrello said. “That doesn’t speak to a political persuasion, it speaks to who’s effective in advancing family, school, and community engagement.”

The groups who criticized the council celebrated its end.

“This faux parents council was nothing more than the administration trying to rig the system once more by stacking the deck with the very special interest groups that awakened parents across America to their long game to politicize public schools with a far-left, anti-parent agenda,” Ian Prior, executive director of Fight for Schools and Families, said in a statement. “This is a major win for parental rights and should serve as a message to the Biden Administration—we have only just begun to fight for our children’s future.”

The future of parent engagement

In its statement, the Education Department said it would continue to engage parents and families through town halls, resources, and tools for students.

But some people view the council’s end as a major failure for the department and a step in the wrong direction even for the conservative groups that pushed against it.

“This was a moment for courageous leadership to stand up and say, ‘No, we actually do value the voice and the priorities of parents and families. We want them as part of this conversation; we want them helping to lead this conversation because these are their children,” Rodrigues said.

Rodrigues viewed the senators’ letter as “sad” and “pathetic,” and she hoped to see federal officials take a stand against it.

Rodrigues believed the council would be used as a sounding board for parents to talk about the issues most important to them, including student mental health, falling test scores, and school safety. She envisioned an opportunity for Biden and Cardona to hear from parents about how the education system could better serve them.

Instead, Rodrigues worries that the cancelation of the council will lead to greater distrust between the federal government and the parents it serves.

“This, to me, is just another reason why parents and families don’t like to engage in politics because both [Democrats and Republicans] have claimed to have the best interest of families and students at heart but neither of them has done anything tangible,” she said.

Going forward, the National Parents Union plans to continue pushing for parent and family engagement and working with the Education Department to advocate for the issues that are most important to parents in the organization, Rodrigues said.

NAFSCE recommends that the department focus on “substantive strategic family engagement,” Borrello said. That means expanding school and district capacity to engage families as partners; enhancing federal policies, guidance, and funding for statewide family engagement centers and parent training and information centers; and implementing a higher education focus on training future educators in best practices to engage parents and families.

“It’s just not enough to do town halls, and webinars, and newsletters,” Borrello said. “They may be informative, but in and of themselves it is not strategic around engaging families as partners.”


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Budget & Finance Webinar
Innovative Funding Models: A Deep Dive into Public-Private Partnerships
Discover how innovative funding models drive educational projects forward. Join us for insights into effective PPP implementation.
Content provided by Follett Learning
Budget & Finance Webinar Staffing Schools After ESSER: What School and District Leaders Need to Know
Join our newsroom for insights on investing in critical student support positions as pandemic funds expire.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Achievement Webinar
How can districts build sustainable tutoring models before the money runs out?
District leaders, low on funds, must decide: broad support for all or deep interventions for few? Let's discuss maximizing tutoring resources.
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Miguel Cardona in the Hot Seat: 4 Takeaways From a Contentious House Hearing
FAFSA, rising antisemitism, and Title IX dominated questioning at a U.S. House hearing with Education Secretary Miguel Cardona.
6 min read
Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona testifies during a House Committee on Education and Workforce hearing on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, May 7, 2024, in Washington.
U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona testifies during a House Committee on Education and Workforce hearing on Capitol Hill on May 7 in Washington.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Federal Arming Teachers Could Cause 'Accidents and More Tragedy,' Miguel Cardona Says
"This is not in my opinion a smart option,” the education secretary said at an EdWeek event.
4 min read
U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona speaks during Education Week’s 2024 Leadership Symposium at the Hyatt Regency Crystal City in Arlington, Va., on May 2, 2024.
U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona speaks during Education Week’s 2024 Leadership Symposium at the Hyatt Regency Crystal City in Arlington, Va., on May 2, 2024.
Sam Mallon/Education Week
Federal Opinion Should Migrant Families Pay Tuition for Public School?
The answer must reflect an outlook that is pro-immigration, pro-compassion, and pro-law and order, writes Michael J. Petrilli.
Michael J. Petrilli
4 min read
Image of a pencil holder filled with a variety of colored pencils that match the background with international flags.
Laura Baker/Education Week via Canva
Federal New Title IX Rule Could Actually Simplify Some Things for Districts, Lawyers Say
School districts could field more harassment complaints, but they can streamline how they handle them, according to legal experts.
7 min read
Illustration of checklist.
F. Sheehan for Education Week + iStock / Getty Images Plus