Federal Campaign Notebook

Cheney, Edwards Clash on Education in Cleveland Debate

By Erik W. Robelen — October 12, 2004 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Although Iraq dominated the vice presidential debate last week, the candidates managed to get in a few jabs on education and, of course, the No Child Left Behind Act.

When asked about what he would do to help the large jobless population in Cleveland, where the Oct. 5 debate was held, Vice President Dick Cheney ended up talking mostly about education.

“I think the most important thing we can do is have a first-class public school system,” he said. “I’m a product of public schools. And the president, his first legislative priority was the No Child Left Behind Act.”

When it came time for Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina to respond, the Democratic vice presidential nominee suggested that perhaps Mr. Cheney had gotten a little sidetracked.

“Gwen, your question was about jobs?” he asked the moderator, Gwen Ifill of “The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer.” She replied that it was about jobs and poverty.

“I thought it was about jobs and poverty,” Mr. Edwards said. “I hope we get a chance to talk about education, but that’s what the vice president talked about.”

Later, Mr. Cheney touted increased spending under President Bush.

“Forty-nine percent increase in funding for elementary and secondary education under No Child Left Behind; that’s a lot of money even by Massachusetts standards,” he said, referring to the home state of the Democratic presidential nominee, Sen. John Kerry.

“Yes, but they didn’t fund the mandates that they put on the schools all over this country,” Mr. Edwards replied.

He added: “John and I have—and I don’t have the time now—but we have a clear plan to improve our public schools that starts with getting our best teachers into the schools where we need them the most by creating incentives for them to go there.”

The vice president replied with a swift right: “No Child Left Behind. They were for it, now they’re against it. They voted for it. Now they’re opposed to it.”

Then it was back again to Sen. Edwards: “We are for accountability, and we are for high standards. John and I voted for No Child Left Behind because we thought that accountability and standards were the right thing to do.”

Mr. Edwards seemed to be warming up for a zinger, but then, oops, it turns out the moderator had accidentally given him time that wasn’t his.

“Well, in fairness, if you feel like you need to go to him, we’ll—I’ll stop,” the senator told Ms. Ifill. And there ended the debate on education.

Events

Reading & Literacy K-12 Essentials Forum Supporting Struggling Readers in Middle and High School
Join this free virtual event to learn more about policy, data, research, and experiences around supporting older students who struggle to read.
School & District Management Webinar Squeeze More Learning Time Out of the School Day
Learn how to increase learning time for your students by identifying and minimizing classroom disruptions.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Improve Reading Comprehension: Three Tools for Working Memory Challenges
Discover three working memory workarounds to help your students improve reading comprehension and empower them on their reading journey.
Content provided by Solution Tree

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Opinion Can School Reform Be Bipartisan Again?
In a world dominated by social media, is there room for a more serious education debate?
8 min read
The United States Capitol building as a bookcase filled with red, white, and blue policy books in a Washington DC landscape.
Luca D'Urbino for Education Week
Federal Judge Tells Ed. Dept. to Remove Language Blaming Democrats From Staff Emails
The agency added language blaming "Democrat Senators" for the federal shutdown to staffers' out-of-office messages
3 min read
Screenshot of a portion of a response email blaming Democrat Senators for the government shutdown.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week + Getty
Federal Trump’s Ed. Dept. Slashed Civil Rights Enforcement. How States Are Responding
Could a shift in civil rights enforcement be the next example of "returning education to the states?"
6 min read
Pennsylvania Sen. Lindsey Williams, D-Allegheny, is pictured during a confirmation hearing for acting
Pennsylvania state Sen. Lindsey Williams, a Democrat, is pictured during an education committee hearing on Aug. 12, 2025. Williams is preparing legislation that would create a state-level office of civil rights to investigate potential civil rights violations in schools. Williams is introducing the measure in response to the U.S. Department of Education's slashing of its own office for civil rights.
Courtesy of Pennsylvania Senate Democratic Caucus
Federal Fired NCES Chief: Ed. Dept. Cuts Mean 'Fewer Eyes on the Condition of Schools'
Experts discuss how federal actions have impacted equity and research in the field of education.
3 min read
Peggy Carr, Commissioner of the National Center for Education, speaks during an interview about the National Assessment of Education Process (NAEP), on Oct. 21, 2022, in Washington.
Peggy Carr, the former commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics, speaks during an interview about the National Assessment of Education Process, on Oct. 21, 2022, in Washington. Carr shared her thoughts about the Trump administration's massive staff cuts to the Education Department in a recent webinar.
Alex Brandon/AP