Federal

Bell Curve Author to Question College Goal in New Book

By David J. Hoff — June 17, 2008 6 min read

Charles Murray is about to publish a book about education—and he promises that educators won’t like it.

Fourteen years after The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure drew wide condemnation for its racially charged arguments on achievement, the author’s latest book, Real Education, will dispute the premise underlying much of education policy: All children should be challenged to achieve at high levels during their K-12 careers and pursue further education after high school.

“It’s just idiotic,” Mr. Murray said of such beliefs in a recent interview.

Relying on the thesis of The Bell Curve—that intelligence, and therefore prospects for academic achievement, is determined by heredity—Mr. Murray’s new book argues that education policies should recognize that not all students can be expected to take high-level academic courses, and that some students should concentrate instead on vocational training to prepare for the workforce.

We’re talking about [college] material that only about 10 percent of high school graduates can understand.”
BRIC ARCHIVE

The ideas “all fall from the recognition that ... variation in [intellectual ability] has enormous relationship to what you can and should do educationally,” said Mr. Murray, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank in Washington.

Although Mr. Murray predicted that most educators and politicians will object to the ideas in Real Education, he said it won’t be as controversial as The Bell Curve. In that 1994 book, he and co-author Richard J. Herrnstein, who died shortly before the book’s publication, wrote that blacks are intellectually inferior to whites, saying that 84 percent of blacks score below the average score of whites, and that educational interventions won’t narrow the achievement gap between the races. Other scholars strongly reject that contention.

“This [new book] doesn’t deal with race,” Mr. Murray said. “Anything that does not deal with race doesn’t get as much blowback as something that does deal with race. ”

‘Simple Truths’

Still, Mr. Murray’s book, scheduled for publication in August by Crown Forum, an imprint of Random House Inc., will probably generate more attention than if anyone else had written it, one education policy expert said.

“If this book were put out by anyone who didn’t have the reputation of Charles Murray, nobody would pay any attention to it,” said Andrew J. Rotherham, a co-director of Education Sector, a Washington think tank.

Mr. Murray previewed some of the ideas in Real Education last month in the journal The New Criterion. In the article, he wrote that education policy based on the idea that schools can dramatically improve student achievement is unproductive.

The federal No Child Left Behind Act’s goal that all students will achieve proficiency in reading and mathematics by the end of the 2013-14 school year is an example of what he calls “educational romanticism.”

Although Mr. Murray touches on such ideas in Real Education, most of the book deals with issues related to higher education.

The book is structured around what Mr. Murray calls “the four simple truths” in education. He outlined those ideas in a series of opinion essays published early last year in The Wall Street Journal.

Although Mr. Murray dedicates a chapter to discussing the educational implications of the variation in intellectual ability, he doesn’t reargue that point, he says.

But the book mischaracterizes the NCLB law, said Mr. Rotherham, who has read a prepublication version. Mr. Murray, he said, doesn’t acknowledge that although universal proficiency is the law’s stated goal, the law has several ways that schools can meet accountability goals until 2013-14 without ensuring universal proficiency.

“It’s a fundamental misreading of No Child Left Behind and where we are on education reform,” said Mr. Rotherham, who was an education adviser to President Clinton at the end of his second term.

Other critics say that Mr. Murray’s emphasis on the immutability of intelligence distracts from efforts to improve academic achievement.

“The fixation on the fixedness of intelligence is probably wrong and in any case cannot be helpful,” said Chester E. Finn Jr., the president of the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, a Washington research and advocacy organization that supports policies such as high academic standards and the creation of charter schools as ways to improve student achievement. “Our kids could learn more than they are learning, and that’s the key point that should drive our education policymaking.”

College for Some?

Because some students don’t have the intellectual ability to handle college-level work, not all students should go to college, Mr. Murray asserts in another of his “truths.”

In the book, Mr. Murray publishes excerpts from college textbooks and suggests that the texts are too difficult for the vast majority of students.

“We’re talking about material that only about 10 percent of high school graduates can understand,” he said in the interview last month.

Instead of paying expensive college-tuition bills, he said, some students should pursue vocational training to win certification for specific skills that are useful in the workforce, such as accounting.

“It doesn’t make a difference if you got your C.P.A. at the University of Virginia or an online school,” Mr. Murray said of preparation to become a certified public accountant. “If you got a good score, you got a good score. You can take that to an employer, and the employer knows what that means.”

Most students shouldn’t consider a four-year college degree that covers the liberal arts and other challenging material, Mr. Murray said.

One researcher said that he agrees with the assertion that not all students should enroll in college. But schools, he said, shouldn’t track students into classes or other programs based on perceptions of their intellectual ability.

“What concerns me is someone making the decision about a kid very early on” in his or her educational experience, said Pedro A. Noguera, a professor of sociology at New York University and one of the organizers of a statement, released last week, that says schools need support from social and health programs to ensure high levels of student achievement. (“2 New Coalitions Seek Influence on Campaigns,” this issue.)

“What we should be striving for is to use education to help poor kids out of poverty,” Mr. Noguera said. “For many of them, that means college.”

Another researcher suggested that many higher education institutions are already largely offering the type of education focused on knowledge and skills needed for specific professions.

“Our system is producing something very close to what [Mr. Murray] wants,” said Jay P. Greene, the chairman of the department of education reform at the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, who has read portions of Real Education.

Predicting Backlash

Another “truth” outlined in the book is that half of students will always be below average, regardless of overall gains in student achievement. The fourth tenet is that U.S. prosperity depends on the education provided to gifted students.

Mr. Murray predicts that many educators will dislike his book because it criticizes the “typical progressive curriculum.”

But one educator said he agrees with the ideas Mr. Murray presented in The Wall Street Journal last year.

“There were pieces of it that made a lot of sense,” said Thomas J. Hanson, a retired superintendent of two Maine school districts.

“He had some very valid points” about not all students going to college, Mr. Hanson said. “There needs to be more than one option available for students.”

A version of this article appeared in the June 18, 2008 edition of Education Week as Bell Curve Author to Question College Goal in New Book

Events

School & District Management Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: What Did We Learn About Schooling Models This Year?
After a year of living with the pandemic, what schooling models might we turn to as we look ahead to improve the student learning experience? Could year-round schooling be one of them? What about online
School & District Management Webinar What's Ahead for Hybrid Learning: Putting Best Practices in Motion
It’s safe to say hybrid learning—a mix of in-person and remote instruction that evolved quickly during the pandemic—is probably here to stay in K-12 education to some extent. That is the case even though increasing
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Building Equitable Systems: Moving Math From Gatekeeper to Opportunity Gateway
The importance of disrupting traditional American math practices and adopting high-quality math curriculum continues to be essential for changing the trajectory of historically under-resourced schools. Building systems around high-quality math curriculum also is necessary to
Content provided by Partnership for L.A. Schools

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Miguel Cardona: Schools Must Work to Win Trust of Families of Color as They Reopen
As Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona announced new school reopening resources, he encouraged a focus on equity and student engagement.
4 min read
Education Secretary nominee Miguel Cardona testifies before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee during his confirmation hearing Feb. 3, 2021.
Now-U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona testifies before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee during his confirmation hearing in February.
Susan Walsh/AP
Federal CDC: Nearly 80 Percent of K-12, Child-Care Workers Have Had at Least One COVID-19 Shot
About four out of five teachers, school staffers, and child-care workers had first COVID-19 vaccine doses by the end of March, CDC says.
2 min read
John Battle High School teacher Jennifer Daniel receives her COVID-19 vaccine on Jan. 11, 2021. Teachers received their first vaccine during an all-day event at the Virginia Highlands Higher Education Center in Abingdon, Va.
John Battle High School teacher Jennifer Daniel receives her COVID-19 vaccine on Jan. 11at the Virginia Highlands Higher Education Center in Abingdon, Va.
David Crigger/Bristol Herald Courier via AP
Federal Ed. Dept. to Review Title IX Rules on Sexual Assault, Gender Equity, LGBTQ Rights
The review could reopen a Trump-era debate on sexual assault in schools, and it could spark legal discord over transgender student rights.
4 min read
Symbols of gender.
iStock/Getty
Federal Q&A EdWeek Q&A: Miguel Cardona Talks Summer Learning, Mental Health, and State Tests
In an interview after a school reopening summit, the education secretary also addressed teachers' union concerns about CDC guidance.
10 min read
Education Secretary Miguel Cardona speaks during a press briefing at the White House on March 17, 2021.
U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona speaks during a press briefing at the White House on March 17.
Andrew Harnik/AP