Education Funding

Andover Gift Raises Questions About Accepting Donations

By Michelle Galley — January 29, 2003 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A $500,000 gift to a leading private school has triggered a national debate about when it is appropriate to accept donations and when schools should instead politely say, “No thank you.”

The trouble began for the Phillips Academy after it established a scholarship fund in the name of former President George H.W. Bush. Contributors included wealthy admirers of the Andover, Mass., school’s famous alumnus.

But when one such admirer, Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin AbdulAziz Alsaud of Saudi Arabia, sent half a million dollars to the $3.3 million scholarship fund at the school, controversy raged.

Following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York City and the Pentagon, Prince Alwaleed criticized U.S. policy in the Middle East, leading then-Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani of New York to reject the prince’s $10 million gift for the victims of those attacks.

If New York City rebuffed Prince Alwaleed’s money, critics wondered, shouldn’t Andover have done so as well?

“I think it is a totally questionable thing for Andover to do—to accept this gift,” Eric Liu, a former policy adviser to President Clinton and one of many critics, said during an appearance on CNN.

Mr. Liu eschewed the notion, however, that the gift had been a bid by the prince to curry favor with the Bush family, as another commentator had suggested. “The idea that an extra $500,000 to a scholarship fund in the president’s name is going to tip the scales somehow is a little bit laughable,” Mr. Liu said.

The elder Mr. Bush knew nothing about the scholarship fund, according to Sharon Britton, the director of communications for Andover. He has not commented on the gift, but a White House spokesman said the current President Bush—also an Andover graduate—believed it was given in good faith, Ms. Britton said. Officials at the 1,100-student Phillips Academy, which has a total endowment in excess of $450 million and charges $28,500 a year for tuition and room and board, believed they acted appropriately in accepting the money last month regardless of Mr. Giuliani’s action.

Prince Alwaleed “made a statement he felt he was free to make, and the mayor was free to return his gift, and that’s what America is all about,” Ms. Britton said.

Broad Guidelines

Guidelines for accepting donations are broad, subjective, and vary from school to school, said Helen Colson, a consultant to independent schools.

In her book Philanthropy at Independent Schools, Ms. Colson outlines principles of good practice for schools to follow when raising money, including: using gifts only for the purposes for which they were intended, allowing donors to make anonymous gifts, disclosing the total amount of donations a school receives, and not accepting gifts in lieu of tuition.

Independent schools, moreover, often decline donations that have strings attached, according to Ms. Colson. “No one wants to accept a gift that changes school policy or procedure,” she said.

Many schools declined to comment on their policies regarding donations. A spokesman for St. Albans School, a prominent private school in Washington, wrote in an e-mail: “Though we do have gift-acceptance policies for all donations received, I’m afraid this is something we’re not in a position to offer insight into.”

Some experts warn of donors who may try to use the good reputation of a school or organization to better their own images.

G. Douglass Alexander, the founder and president of the Atlanta-based philanthropy-consulting firm Alexander, Haas, Martin and Partners, said serious ethical issues arise when a donor expects a lot of publicity for giving money.

“There is really very little philanthropy going on” in such situations, Mr. Alexander said.

Prince Alwaleed, who did not seek publicity for his gift to Andover, has invested heavily in many U.S.-based companies. In 2001, he was ranked the sixth-richest man in the world by Forbes magazine.

Others say it isn’t anyone’s business from whom schools accept money.

“People are free to complain,” said Steven Lee, an ethics professor at Hobart & William Smith Colleges, in Geneva, N.Y. “But there really is no moral basis for their complaint unless the money is morally tainted.” Such money would come from such sources as organized crime, Mr. Lee said.

People throughout the education community apparently are willing, however, to accept money from some donors who have gotten into trouble with the law.

For instance, the Milken Family Foundation, which has given more than $250 million to education-related initiatives since its inception in 1982, was founded by the financier Michael Milken, who served 22 months in prison after pleading guilty in 1990 to five securities and reporting violations and one charge of conspiracy. Education Week is a former recipient of grant money from the foundation.

Such questions aren’t limited to private schools. Public schools also need to be cautious when accepting donations, said Arnold F. Fege, the director of public engagement for the Washington-based Public Education Network.

“The responsibility to fund public schools lies with the taxpayers,” he said. “When money comes from elsewhere, the benefactor must not require a quid pro quo.” Donors to public schools should not, for instance, demand that a specific curriculum be taught, Mr. Fege said.

Public schools need to consider the source of donations carefully, he added. “I wouldn’t accept money,” he said, “from distillers or cigarette companies.”

Schools should establish clear policies about outside funding, Mr. Fege advised, “before they face the pressure of some disingenuous contribution.”

‘No Strings Attached’

In deciding whether to accept a gift, Andover always considers the source, according to Ms. Britton. “You don’t want to take money if you think it is ill-gotten,” she said.

The school refuses money from tobacco companies. Still, it is rare that fund-raisers at the school need to decline an objectionable gift. “Somebody who is interested in exploiting children probably wouldn’t be interested in helping a school,” Ms. Britton said.

School officials have also turned down gifts in the past, Ms. Britton continued, “if someone tried to attach a condition.” She added, “We don’t want to be hamstrung.

“If someone tried to set up a scholarship fund for boys who play tuba and are from Montana, we would try to convince people to take the condition off it, so that we could provide scholarships to the best kids, the brightest kids, and the most deserving kids.”

Prince Alwaleed’s gift, she stressed, “came with no strings attached.”

Related Tags:

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Professional Development Webinar
Grow Leaders, Keep Teachers: Leadership Development as a Staffing Strategy
Find out how to turn leadership development into a staffing strategy and grow your next generation of school leaders from within.
Content provided by Frontline Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
Closing the Practice Gap: Essential Insights for Leaders
Three instructional experts will share strategies for making students’ reading and math practice more engaging and impactful this year.
Content provided by Renaissance

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding Trump Cut Their Education Grants. Here’s What Happened Next
Grantees whose work ground to a halt last year lament broken promises and abandoned projects.
15 min read
Dr. Stephanie Cross, a professor at Georgia State University, photographed in her home in Brookhaven, Georgia.
Stephanie Lee Behm Cross, a professor at Georgia State University, stands in her home in Brookhaven, Ga., on July 13, 2026. Cross ran a teacher-residency program funded by a U.S. Department of Education grant until the funding was abruptly terminated in February 2025.
Dustin Chambers for Education Week
Education Funding School Pregnancy Prevention Efforts Shut Down as Trump Emphasizes Abstinence
The administration has canceled funding for more than 50 teen pregnancy prevention programs.
9 min read
Florida SexEd Curriculum 24267748051016
Materials for teens and parents on pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections provided by Teen Health Mississippi are displayed on Sept. 26, 2023, in Jackson, Miss. Dozens of organizations nationwide that ran teen pregnancy prevention efforts had their federal funding abruptly terminated last month.
Rogelio V. Solis/AP Photo
Education Funding Federal English-Learner Grant Returns This Fall Under New Oversight
The national professional development grant program has experienced upheaval in the last year.
4 min read
A look at the state of teaching with English learner students in Antioch, Tenn.
English learners work through disecting a speech at John F. Kennedy Middle School in Antioch, Tenn. on Dec. 3, 2025. National professional development grants focus on developing more teachers to work with these students.
William DeShazer for Education Week
Education Funding Explainer Big Changes to Federal Grants Are Coming: What They Could Mean for Schools
The White House is proposing sweeping regulatory changes for federal grantmaking.
11 min read
The Eisenhower Executive Office Building is seen from the Washington Monument, on May 26, 2026, in Washington.
The Eisenhower Executive Office Building, which houses the White House Office of Management and Budget, is seen from the Washington Monument, on May 26, 2026, in Washington. OMB has proposed a sweeping set of regulatory changes would add new restrictions on grant-funded efforts that clash with Trump administration policy positions and give political appointees new powers in federal grantmaking.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP