Law & Courts

Administration Criticized On Girls’ Education Issues

April 14, 2004 | Corrected: February 23, 2019 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Corrected: This story misquoted Susan Aspey, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Education. In criticizing the report, Ms. Aspey said it amounted to “special-interest politics in a political year.”

The Bush administration is accused of rolling back the progress of girls and women, including their opportunities to succeed at school, in a sharply worded report issued last week by the National Women’s Law Center.

View the April 2004 report, “Slip-Sliding Away: The Erosion of Hard-Won Gains for Women Under the Bush Administration and an Agenda for Moving Forward,” from the National Women’s Law Center. (Requires Adobe’s Acrobat Reader.)

The Washington-based advocacy organization cites a range of what it perceives as offenses related to education, such as efforts by the Bush administration to zero out funding for the Women’s Educational Equity Act and to “weaken Title IX protections for female athletes,” and its failure to investigate the exclusion of females from certain education programs.

Moreover, the law center, which has been a vocal critic of Bush administration policies, attacked proposed Education Department rules issued in March on single-sex schooling. The group contends that the changes would “decrease the safeguards that ensure equal opportunity when sex-segregated programs are provided.” (“Rules on Single-Sex Education Allow Room to Experiment,” March 10, 2004.)

The April 8 report reviews the administration’s record in 10 major areas, and recommends a series of measures the group believes would expand and protect women’s rights and opportunities. Beyond education, the report covers subjects from child care and tax policy to Social Security, abortion rights, violence against women, and women in the military.

“What we’re trying to do is to pull all of these instances together,” said Nancy Duff Campbell, the group’s co-president, “to show a … widespread pattern.”

Ms. Campbell, in an April 8 conference call with reporters, said that while certain Bush administration moves have been widely known, “some of these actions are occurring almost completely out of the public eye.”

Claims Called ‘Bogus’

Education Department spokeswoman Susan Aspey said the report amounted to “special-interest politics in an election year.”

“The education claims are outrageous and, frankly, bogus, and they know it,” she added.

The law center laments President Bush’s lack of support for the $3 million Women’s Educational Equity program, which, among other provisions, provides curricula and materials to help schools comply with Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Title IX prohibits sex discrimination in educational programs receiving federal funds.

“Every year it has been in office, the administration has tried to eliminate funding for [the program],” the report says.

In its budget proposal for fiscal 2005, the Education Department said such activities could be supported through “larger, more flexible” federal education programs.

The law center maintains that the department has “refused” to investigate the exclusion of women from traditionally male educational programs, from vocational education in high school to enrollment and employment in math and science programs at major research universities.

For instance, the center filed 12 “petitions for compliance review” in June 2002, requesting investigation of what it described as “stark patterns of sex segregation in high school vocational programs.” The department declined to investigate these matters, the report says. The law center cites a letter it received on the matter from the department’s office for civil rights in January 2003, which argued that the agency would not undertake such compliance activities based on statistical data alone.

The Education Department’s Ms. Aspey said the agency sent letters in response seeking more specific information, such as the names of schools.

“The bottom line is, we take all allegations of discrimination very, very seriously,” she said. “We’ve asked them for more information, and for whatever reason they won’t provide it. … We can’t investigate an allegation if we don’t have enough facts.”

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
IT Infrastructure Webinar
A New Era In Connected Learning: Security, Accessibility and Affordability for a Future-Ready Classroom
Learn about Windows 11 SE and Surface Laptop SE. Enable students to unlock learning and develop new skills.
Content provided by Microsoft Surface
Classroom Technology K-12 Essentials Forum Making Technology Work Better in Schools
Join experts for a look at the steps schools are taking (or should take) to improve the use of technology in schools.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Budget & Finance Webinar
The ABCs of ESSER: How to Make the Most of Relief Funds Before They Expire
Join a diverse group of K-12 experts to learn how to leverage federal funds before they expire and improve student learning environments.
Content provided by Johnson Controls

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Conservatives’ Checklist: U.S. Supreme Court Education Decisions to Overrule
Here are five education issues that could be targets for reconsideration if Roe v. Wade falls.
3 min read
The Supreme Court in Washington, Dec. 3, 2021. The Supreme Court has turned away a plea from parents to block a new admissions policy at a prestigious high school in northern Virginia that a lower court had found discriminates against Asian American students.
The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Dec. 3, 2021.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Law & Courts Leaked Abortion Draft Has Supreme Court Education Cases in Political Cross-Hairs
Conservatives have taken aim at decisions on educating immigrants, race in admissions, and religion. Liberals have some cases in mind, too.
8 min read
supreme court SOC
Getty
Law & Courts 'Brown v. Board' Cited in Draft Supreme Court Opinion to Back Overturning Abortion Rights
The leaked opinion in a case still to be decided by the Supreme Court cites landmark decisions including Brown v. Board of Education.
7 min read
A crowd of people gather outside the Supreme Court, Monday night, May 2, 2022 in Washington. A draft opinion circulated among Supreme Court justices suggests that earlier this year a majority of them had thrown support behind overturning the 1973 case Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a report published Monday night in Politico. It's unclear if the draft represents the court's final word on the matter. The Associated Press could not immediately confirm the authenticity of the draft Politico posted, which if verified marks a shocking revelation of the high court's secretive deliberation process, particularly before a case is formally decided.
A crowd gathers outside the U.S. Supreme Court Monday night after the leak of a draft opinion suggesting the court intends to overturn the 1973 <i>Roe v. Wade</i> precedent that legalized abortion nationwide.
Alex Brandon/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Rules Against Some 'Emotional Distress' Claims. What It Means for Schools
The dissenters say the decision means students cannot recover damages for the emotional harms of race, sex, or disability bias.
5 min read
Image of the Supreme Court.
iStock/Getty