States

A State Capitals Roundup

January 31, 2001 5 min read

Mass. Gives Students More Cracks at Passing Exams

The Massachusetts board of education approved a plan last week to allow students five chances to pass the state’s controversial accountability tests.

Under the plan adopted Jan. 23 for the Massachusetts Comprehensive Accountability System, which is given each year to 4th, 8th and 10th graders, students who have failed the MCAS will be able to take “focused” retests designed solely to determine whether they have met minimum passing standards on the tests.

The class of 2003 must pass the mathematics and English portions of the tests to earn a diploma. The MCAS has been hotly debated by teachers, students, and other activists throughout the state. Last April, hundreds of high school students from about a dozen schools boycotted the tests.

“The issue of retesting is an issue of fairness,” said David P. Driscoll, the state commissioner of education. “We want to provide students with the opportunity to pass the test.”

But Stephen Gorrie, the president of the Massachusetts Teachers Association, a 90,000-member affiliate of the National Education Association that has campaigned against the MCAS, said the changes don’t fundamentally alter what the union sees as an unfair testing system.

“We still have many reservations about the test itself,” Mr. Gorrie said. “This still doesn’t address the issue that you can’t have a test like this that punishes schools and students.”

—John Gehring


Suit Over N.J. Facilities Dismissed

A judge in New Jersey has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to stop the state from borrowing $8.6 billion to pay for its new school construction program.

Mayor Steve Lonegan of Bogota in Bergen County filed the suit in December, arguing that the state lacked the constitutional authority to issue bonds to finance the construction effort without voter approval. (“Building Block?,” Jan. 10, 2001.)

But Superior Court Judge Sybil R. Moses noted that the state had borrowed money before, without a green light from voters, to pay for public projects. “To continue the case would serve no salutory purpose,” Judge Moses said in her Jan. 24 ruling. Mr. Lonegan has pledged to appeal the trial-level decision.

School groups statewide were watching the case, fearing it would jeopardize the lengthy battle to get the state to help upgrade schools. The program grew out of a 1998 state supreme court ruling that ordered the state to provide better facilities in the 30 districts that were part of the landmark Abbott v. Burke school funding lawsuit.

After debating the issue for two years, lawmakers ratified the program in legislation last July, which Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, a Republican, signed.

Edwina M. Lee, the executive director of the New Jersey School Boards Association, welcomed the ruling. “New Jersey can now move forward with the most significant public works project in our state’s history,” she said.

—Robert C. Johnston


K.C. Takeover Bill Proposed in Mo.

The threat of a state takeover of the Kansas City, Mo., school system, which lost its state accreditation last May, could be even more immediate than district officials had thought.

The beleaguered district, the scene of one of the nation’s costliest and most closely watched desegregation cases, has been given until June of next year to improve student performance in order to avoid a state takeover. But under legislation proposed last week by two Missouri lawmakers, the state would take control as soon as the measure was signed into law.

“Kansas City has had long enough,” said Rep. Tim Van Zandt, who wrote the bill along with fellow Kansas City Democratic Rep. Marsha Campbell. “If they have another year before the state decides to take over, that’s another class of graduates and another class coming that can’t read and can’t learn.”

David Smith, a spokesman for the 30,000-student district, said Kansas City school administrators were focusing on regaining accreditation rather than worrying about the bill.

“If we raise the level of education for our children to get our accreditation, the other things will take care of themselves,” he said.

In May 2000, state officials determined that the district did not meet state standards despite a long-standing desegregation case that resulted in one of the most scrutinized and expensive efforts to ensure that all children, regardless of race, received equal educational opportunities. The 1977 lawsuit by a group of parents led to court-ordered improvement efforts totaling some $2 billion.

A hearing on the bill is expected in the coming weeks.

—Lisa Fine


Colo. Tax Breaks Die in Committee

The education committee of the Colorado House last week rejected a bill that would have allowed parents of children in low-performing public schools to claim a tax credit of as much as $3,000 for moving the students to private settings.

In opposing the tax-credit plan, which would have been one of the more generous in the country, the Colorado Association of School Boards called it part of the “voucher family.”

The committee voted 6-5 on Jan. 24 against an amended bill proposed by Republican Rep. David Schultheis.

His original bill would have allowed the state income-tax credit for parents of children in public schools that received D’s or F’s under the state’s new accountability program. Parents could have claimed as much as $3,000 in credits for enrolling their children in private schools, or $1,500 for teaching them at home.

Under state law, school performance grades are to be given for the first time this summer, although Gov. Bill Owens, a Republican, has endorsed replacing letter grades with categories such as “excellent” and “unsatisfactory.”

The Colorado legislative council’s office estimated the state would lose $58 million in income-tax revenue the first year if parents of only 10 percent of the projected 192,000 students attending D and F schools claimed the tax credit.

Mr. Schultheis amended his bill in the committee to apply only to students in the lowest-performing 2 percent of schools, cutting loss projections to $2 million. But the panel still rejected the bill.

—Mark Walsh

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the January 31, 2001 edition of Education Week as A State Capitals Roundup

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Culturally Relevant Pedagogy to Advance Educational Equity
Schools are welcoming students back into buildings for full-time in-person instruction in a few short weeks and now is the perfect time to take a hard look at both our practices and systems to build
Content provided by PowerMyLearning
Classroom Technology Webinar Making Big Technology Decisions: Advice for District Leaders, Principals, and Teachers
Educators at all levels make decisions that can have a huge impact on students. That’s especially true when it comes to the use of technology, which was activated like never before to help students learn
Professional Development Webinar Expand Digital Learning by Expanding Teacher Training
This discussion will examine how things have changed and offer guidance on smart, cost-effective ways to expand digital learning efforts and train teachers to maximize the use of new technologies for learning.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

States Who's Really Driving Critical Race Theory Legislation? An Investigation
Education Week reporting documents a complex web of individuals and conservative organizations supporting this far-reaching legislation.
15 min read
Conceptual image.
Collage by Laura Baker/Education Week (Images: DigitalVision Vectors and iStock/Getty)
States Download Full Text of the Texas Law Restricting Classroom Talk on Racism (HB 3979)
The Texas law restricts how teachers talk about controversial issues and limits the ways slavery and racism are taught.
1 min read
States How Will Bans on 'Divisive' Classroom Topics Be Enforced? Here's What 10 States Plan to Do
States will use lawsuits, penalties against districts, and disciplinary action against teachers to enforce "critical race theory" laws.
5 min read
In this April 15, 2021, photo, Arizona Republican Gov. Doug Ducey speaks during a bill signing in Phoenix. Ducey, on July 9, 2021, signed legislation banning government agencies from requiring training in critical race theory.
Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey signs a law that will fine districts $5,000 each time a teacher makes a student feel uncomfortable about their race or gender.
Ross D. Franklin/AP
States Allow Critical Race Theory—and Opposing Views—in Kentucky Schools, Ed. Chief Says
Kentucky Education Commissioner Jason Glass urged lawmakers to consider an alternative to banning critical race theory.
Valarie Honeycutt Spears, Lexington Herald-Leader
1 min read
The exterior of the Kentucky State Capitol is seen in Frankfort, Ky. on April 7, 2021.
The exterior of the Kentucky State Capitol is seen in Frankfort, Ky. on April 7, 2021.<br/>
Timothy D. Easley/AP