Law & Courts

A Full U.S. Appeals Court Lets Federal Right-to-Education Case Go Forward

By Mark Walsh — December 11, 2020 3 min read
Image shows a courtroom and gavel.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Over a vigorous dissent, a full federal appeals court has narrowly voted against rehearing a case in which an appellate panel revived a lawsuit raising a novel claim to a federal right to education for poor children in two Mississippi school districts.

The suit alleges that Mississippi’s lack of a “uniform” education system under its 1987 state constitution violates the post-Civil War federal law that readmitted the state to the Union based on an 1868 state constitution that did include such a guarantee.

In an April decision, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, in New Orleans, unanimously reinstated the claims brought by a group of African-American women on behalf of their children attending substandard schools in Jackson and Yazoo City, Miss.

The appellate panel revived the part of the suit based on the federal Readmission Act, but it said it could not revive a claim that the uniform education clause of the 1868 Mississippi constitution was still legally binding.

Mississippi asked the full 5th Circuit court to toss out the panel’s ruling and reconsider the case based on arguments that there is no private right to sue to enforce the Readmission Act and that the plaintiffs are seeking to have a federal court order state officials to “conform their conduct to state law as it was in 1868,” as they put it in court papers.

‘This Strange Case …’

On Dec. 7, in a short opinion in Williams v. Reeves, the full 5th Circuit court announced that it had voted 9-8 against rehearing.

Judge Edith H. Jones wrote a dissent joined by the other seven who would have voted to rehear the case.

“This strange case seeks a declaratory judgment that Mississippi’s 1868 Constitution, which satisfied the terms of the post-Civil War Readmission Act of Congress, granted more educational rights to African-American children than an amendment to the state’s Constitution in 1987,” Jones said.

Jones said the result sought by the plaintiffs would essentially “tell Mississippi what its state Constitution meant then and means now and would pave the way for federal court orders to effect a major restructuring of state school funding. Federal courts, however, have no business interpreting and enforcing state law against state government.”

Jones said that the federal district court, taking up the revived lawsuit, will have to balance the meaning of “a uniform system” of public schools in Mississippi’s 1868 constitution against “the establishment, maintenance and support” of public schools described in the state’s 1987 constitutional amendment.

“Only after finding that the provisions conflict and that the newer provision is less protective of plaintiffs’ children than the 1868 provision could a court conclude that the ‘school rights and privileges’ referenced in the federal Readmission Act have not been ‘secured by the constitution’ of Mississippi,” Jones said.

The analysis required under the suit is really a task for Mississippi’s state courts, not any federal court, Jones said. And the state has sovereign immunity from suits of this sort, she said.

“The plaintiffs’ case is doomed irrespective of constitutional sovereign immunity because [the plaintiffs] are not empowered to enforce the Readmission Act,” Jones said. “We may not subject the state to further litigation and travail.”

But the vote against rehearing will subject the state to “further litigation and travail,” although it seems likely the state will appeal the panel decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, which may be less receptive to the plaintiffs’ theory of the case.

The Mississippi suit is advancing in a year when there have been several significant developments in cases invoking various theories of a federal right to education.

In April, in a decision that briefly jolted school law circles, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, in Cincinnati, issued an opinion recognizing a federal constitutional right of access to education, in the form of a right to literacy. But that decision was later vacated after the underlying lawsuit challenging poor conditions in the Detroit school system was settled.

In October, a federal district judge in Rhode Island held that the U.S. Constitution does not encompass a right to civics education, though the judge commended the thrust of the lawsuit brought by high school students in the state as “a cry for help from a generation of young people who are destined to inherit a country which we—the generation currently in charge—are not stewarding well.”

Related Tags:


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Assessment Webinar
The State of Assessment in K-12 Education
What is the impact of assessment on K-12 education? What does that mean for administrators, teachers and most importantly—students?
Content provided by Instructure
Jobs January 2022 Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Proven Strategies to Improve Reading Scores
In this webinar, education and reading expert Stacy Hurst will provide a look at some of the biggest issues facing curriculum coordinators, administrators, and teachers working in reading education today. You will: Learn how schools
Content provided by Reading Horizons

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Major Cases on Affirmative Action in Education
The outcome could affect K-12 policies when the justices rule on race-based policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.
3 min read
A man talks on his phone on the steps of Harvard University's Widener Library, in Cambridge, Mass. on June 26, 2020.
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to take up major cases on affirmative action in admissions at Harvard University, above, and at the University of North Carolina.
Elise Amendola/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court to Hear Case of Coach Who Prayed After Games in Defiance of School District
The U.S. Supreme Court will consider whether school districts may prohibit private religious expression by public school employees.
4 min read
Former Bremerton High School assistant football coach Joe Kennedy is in a conflict with the Bremerton, 
Wash., school district over his silent prayer after games.
Former Bremerton High School assistant football coach Joseph A. Kennedy stands at on the 50-yard line at Bremerton Memorial Stadium. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal over his dismissal for praying after football games.
Larry Steagall/Kitsap Sun via AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Blocks Biden Vaccine Mandate Applying to Schools in Much of the Country
The justices ruled 6-3 to stay an Occupational Health and Safety Administration rule that covered schools in 26 states and two territories.
4 min read
Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo last April.
The U.S. Supreme Court blocked a federal vaccine mandate for large employers, including school districts in about half the states.
Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP
Law & Courts Students Lose Appeal on Right to Civics Education, But Win Praise From Judges Anyway
A federal appellate court panel commended Rhode Island students for the novel effort, but said Supreme Court precedent stood in the way.
3 min read
Scales of justice and Gavel on wooden table and Lawyer or Judge working with agreement in Courtroom, Justice and Law concept.
Pattanaphong Khuankaew/iStock