School & District Management

Synthesis Finds District Leadership-Learning Link

By Jeff Archer — October 10, 2006 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Advocates of district-led strategies to improve teaching and learning have complained in recent years about what they see as a shortage of empirical studies on how school system leadership may affect student achievement.

But two well-known researchers, Robert J. Marzano and J. Timothy Waters, contend that when what evidence does exist is put together, the message is clear: Superintendents can improve student performance, so long as they do the right things.

“School District Leadership That Works: The Effect of Superintendent Leadership on Student Achievement” is available from Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.

In a paper released last week, the two experts at Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning, the federally funded regional laboratory in Denver known as McREL, distill 27 studies on district leadership and student results. Using meta-analysis techniques, they combined the effects found in those studies and arrived at a positive and statistically significant correlation.

Actions aimed at creating what they called “goal oriented” districts were the most powerful.

“There are some things that you ought to be clear and intentional about doing, because you know they have a relation to student achievement,” said Mr. Waters, the president of McREL. “We’ve taken some of the guesswork out of that.”

Although hardly counterintuitive, the paper could shape policy discussions on the development of district leaders. A 3-year-old McREL meta-analysis on school leadership, for example, has informed the training and evaluation of principals in a number of states.

Settling Debates?

Dan Katzir, the managing director of the Los Angeles-based Broad Foundation, said the new results also could help settle debates on where improvement efforts should be focused. The foundation runs a superintendent-training program and bestows an annual award for improved urban districts.

“I think there are a lot of people in the education reform world who believe the most effective way to make change is at the school level, and not at the district level,” Mr. Katzir said. But, he added, “a system can do a lot of things that an individual school can’t.”

For their new analysis, the McREL researchers scoured the abstracts of some 200 studies on district leadership published over the past 30 years in search of those that included links to measures of student achievement that could be standardized.

Of the 27 that met that criterion, 14 included a general measure of leadership, such as surveys of superintendents and their constituents about the abilities of those in charge of the district.

Goal-Oriented Outlook Found Powerful

=para

McREL’s meta-analysis of studies on district-level leadership found that successful superintendents:

• Set “non-negotiable” goals for achievement and instruction.

• Involve others, especially principals, in setting those goals.

• Align school board support to performance and instructional objectives.

• Continually monitor progress and make corrections when needed.

• Focus resources, especially for training, on districtwide goals.

SOURCE: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning

In statistical terms, the combined analysis of those studies showed a positive correlation of .24. To grasp what that means, imagine a superintendent whose measures of leadership and district-level student achievement are at the 50th percentile.

If that superintendent improved his or her leadership so as to move to the 84th percentile—a shift of one standard deviation—the predicted result would be a jump in average student achievement to the 59.5th percentile.

“This is not a small change,” said Mr. Marzano, a senior scholar McREL. “You don’t get correlations in the social sciences that are much above that. It might be worth districts’ looking at the effectiveness of their leadership.”

Analyzing all 27 studies, the researchers discovered the greatest benefit in behaviors that focused a district on agreed-up goals, such as when superintendents secured support from the school board for performance targets or continually monitored for progress.

The results also shed some light on the long-standing debate about site-based management. They found little benefit when schools got latitude to determine their own objectives, but did find value in allowing some discretion in how to meet them.

The authors say “defined autonomy” is likely the most effective approach. That is, districts needn’t require the same instructional model in all classrooms, but they must ensure common understandings about what makes for good teaching.

Findings With Traction

Paul D. Houston, the executive director of the American Association of School Administrators, said he hopes that political leaders and school board members pay attention to the message of the new analysis.

The view that administration has little value to schools’ instructional mission has recently fueled interest in the “65 percent solution”—a requirement that at least 65 percent of school dollars be spent on the classroom.

“If you’re defined by others as sort of a superficial appendage to the process, that not only shapes your self-concept, but also the power and authority you need to get the job done,” said Mr. Houston, whose Arlington, Va.-based group represents district superintendents.

He also noted that the analysis found a significant positive link between achievement and superintendents’ tenures, suggesting that high turnover among leaders undermines efforts to improve learning.

McREL plans to publish a book expanding on the study’s methodology and findings, as the lab did with the meta-analysis of effective principal leadership, which became the basis of School Leadership That Works, published last year with the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development in Alexandria, Va.

Carried out with a former McREL vice president, Brian McNulty, that earlier work proved influential by identifying 21 essential responsibilities of principals. It also stressed that to be successful, leaders must understand the extent to which their actions represent a change to their schools.

Iowa, for example, used the findings to update its state standards for school leaders. Michigan is using them to help create a new administrator credential. And the University of North Carolina built a yearlong training program for superintendents around them.

Coverage of education research is supported in part by a grant from the Spencer Foundation.
A version of this article appeared in the October 11, 2006 edition of Education Week as Synthesis Finds District Leadership-Learning Link

Events

Classroom Technology Webinar How Pandemic Tech Is (and Is Not) Transforming K-12 Schools
The COVID-19 pandemic—and the resulting rise in virtual learning and big investments in digital learning tools— helped educators propel their technology skills to the next level. Teachers have become more adept at using learning management
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Building Teacher Capacity for Social-Emotional Learning
Set goals that support adult well-being and social-emotional learning: register today!


Content provided by Panorama
Jobs October 2021 Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School & District Management Staff Shortages Affect Students, Too. Here's Where Schools Are Shutting Down
A few months into the third academic year in a row disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, at least several dozen school buildings in numerous states have had to shut down due to inadequate staffing.
1 min read
A Brownsville Independent School District bus acts as a WI-FI hotspot for students needing to connect online for distance learning on the first day of class Tuesday, Aug. 25, 2020, in the parking lot of the Margaret M. Clark Aquatic Center in Brownsville, Texas. The bus is one of 20 hotspots throughout the city to help students have access to their online classes as part of the remote start to the school year due to COVID-19 pandemic.
Several shool buildings in different parts of the country have had to shut down in recent weeks due to a lack of available bus drivers.
Denise Cathey/The Brownsville Herald via AP
School & District Management Opinion We’re Facing a Looming Crisis of Principal Burnout
Caught in the crosshairs of a pandemic and rancorous partisan battles, many principals have never been more exhausted.
David E. DeMatthews
4 min read
Conceptual Illustration of burnt-out leader.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week and Getty
School & District Management What Teachers Value Most in Their Principals
For National Principals Month, we asked teachers what they love most about their principals. Here's what they had to say.
Hayley Hardison
1 min read
Illustration of job candidate and check list.
Getty
School & District Management How Staff Shortages Are Crushing Schools
Teachers are sacrificing their planning periods, students are arriving hours late, meals are out of whack, and patience is running thin.
11 min read
Stephanie LeBlanc, instructional strategist at Greeley Middle School in Cumberland Center, Maine.
Stephanie LeBlanc, an instructional strategist at Greely Middle School in Cumberland Center, Maine, has picked up numerous additional duties to help cover for staffing shortages at the school.
Ryan David Brown for Education Week