Equity & Diversity

Researcher Insists N.Y.C. Vouchers Benefit Black Students

By Debra Viadero — June 18, 2003 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Yet another analysis of results from a privately financed experiment with school vouchers in New York City suggests that the program produced significant test-score gains for African-American students.

The findings, unveiled last week by Harvard University researchers Paul E. Peterson and William G. Howell, are the latest in a series of analyses that have yielded different conclusions from the same data.

The program in question, which began in 1997, provides scholarships of $1,400 a year to 1,200 New York public school students so they can attend private schools.

While school choice is a perennial hot topic, the New York effort particularly interested researchers and policymakers because it offered a rare chance to empirically test the effects of vouchers. Since the vouchers were distributed by lottery, researchers could compare the experiences of the winning students with those of students who sought, but did not receive, vouchers.

The full text of Peterson-Howell’s study, “Efficiency, Bias, and Classification Schemes: Estimating Private-School Impacts on Test Scores in the New York City Voucher Experiment,” is available from the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. (Requires Adobe’s Acrobat Reader.)

The first analysis of the results, which the Harvard researchers conducted with Mathematica Policy Research Inc., showed that while students overall derived no academic benefit from the program, African-American students did make sizable gains. (“Voucher Plans’ Test Data Yield Puzzling Trends,” Feb. 27, 2002.)

That finding was disputed earlier this year by Alan B. Krueger and Pei Zhu, two Princeton University researchers who re-examined the data. Their analysis concluded that the gains found for black students were too small to be significant. (“Study: No Academic Gains from Vouchers for Black Students,” April 9, 2003.)

In the new study, Mr. Peterson and Mr. Howell try to dispel the Princeton researchers’ criticisms of their work by configuring the data dozens of different ways.

Not Persuaded

“The basic story here is whether you do it one way or another, you get significant, positive impacts for African- Americans,” said Mr. Peterson, a professor of government at Harvard.

By Mr. Peterson and Mr. Howell’s optimal calculations, black students who attended private schools for three years under the program outscored their public school counterparts who weren’t chosen in the lottery by 8.4 percentile points. That gain—equal to about a grade level—is slightly lower than the 9.2 percentile points that the Harvard researchers first reported.

Mr. Peterson said the change reflects some revisions the authors made in their calculations.

Interviewed last week, however, Mr. Krueger said the points the Harvard researchers made in their new study were still “off the mark.” The new findings also failed to sway a group of prominent researchers assembled by the Washington-based Economic Policy Institute via teleconference to answer reporters’ questions about the new study.

Looking at both re-analyses, Cecilia E. Rouse, a Princeton economics and public-policy professor, concludes: “Really, what you take away from this is that the results are basically not as robust as previously characterized.”

A major point of contention between the Princeton analysis and the Harvard study was whether to include students for whom the researchers had no baseline test scores. Adding those students to the mix increases the sample size by 44 percent and reduces some of the original test-score gains.

“The simplest thing to do is to compare those who got vouchers with those who didn’t,” Mr. Krueger said. “The beauty of an experiment is that you should be able to control for anything, and it should not change your results.”

Mr. Peterson and Mr. Howell argue in their new paper, however, for including only students with baseline test-score data—or at least factoring the scores into the calculations. “You’ve got a lot better-quality information if you know kids started out from the same place at the very beginning,” Mr. Peterson said.

The Harvard researchers also took issue with the Princeton scholars’ methods for classifying students’ race and ethnicity. When students were African-American and Hispanic, for example, Mr. Krueger and his co-author classified them as both. The Harvard researchers took the categories to be mutually exclusive.

Mr. Peterson and Mr. Howell also recalculated the race-related numbers several ways, looking at whether a student’s mother, both parents, either parent, or caretaker was black. Results were positive each time, they said.

Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Teaching Webinar
What’s Next for Teaching and Learning? Key Trends for the New School Year
The past 18 months changed the face of education forever, leaving teachers, students, and families to adapt to unprecedented challenges in teaching and learning. As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Curriculum Webinar
How Data and Digital Curriculum Can Drive Personalized Instruction
As we return from an abnormal year, it’s an educator’s top priority to make sure the lessons learned under adversity positively impact students during the new school year. Digital curriculum has emerged from the pandemic
Content provided by Kiddom
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Leadership for Racial Equity in Schools and Beyond
While the COVID-19 pandemic continues to reveal systemic racial disparities in educational opportunity, there are revelations to which we can and must respond. Through conscientious efforts, using an intentional focus on race, school leaders can
Content provided by Corwin

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Equity & Diversity Reported Essay What the Indian Caste System Taught Me About Racism in American Schools
Born and raised in India, reporter Eesha Pendharkar isn’t convinced that America’s anti-racist efforts are enough to make students of color feel like they belong.
7 min read
Conceptual Illustration
Pep Montserrat for Education Week
Equity & Diversity Reported Essay Our Student Homeless Numbers Are Staggering. Schools Can Be a Bridge to a Solution
The pandemic has only made the student homelessness situation more volatile. Schools don’t have to go it alone.
5 min read
Conceptual illustration
Pep Montserrat for Education Week
Equity & Diversity How Have the Debates Over Critical Race Theory Affected You? Share Your Story
We want to hear how new constraints on teaching about racism have affected your schools.
1 min read
Mary Hassdyk for Education Week
Equity & Diversity Opinion When Educational Equity Descends Into Educational Nihilism
Schools need to buckle down to engage and educate kids—not lower (or eliminate) expectations in the name of “equity.”
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty