Opinion
School & District Management Letter to the Editor

Who’s in Charge at Charters?

August 10, 2010 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

Your July 14, 2010, issue features a Commentary by Greg Richmond concerning charter school boards and their relationships with education management organizations (“Who’s in Charge at Charter Schools?”).

Mr. Richmond completely misstates the content and purpose of the 2006 Ohio legislation he refers to in his essay, involving the replacement of a charter school board. He specifically mentions our company as an example of “turning accountability on its head.” I wish that he had talked to me, or to White Hat’s chief executive officer, to understand what actually is occurring.

Mr. Richmond should agree that a rogue charter school board can exist. The issue is, what can the legislature do about that? The Ohio legislature decided that, in the event a contract with an education management organization was terminated, an appeal could be filed with the school’s sponsor, who would then determine whether that termination was appropriate.

The sponsor would have the power to replace the board if that decision were necessary. At that point, the education management organization would have the right to recommend trustees for the board. However, only the sponsor has the final authority of appointment.

Possibly some other method could have been used to deal with the question of rogue boards. But the Ohio legislature decided on this method.

The statement that White Hat Management has taken action “to remove the boards of 10 charter schools” is erroneous and absolutely untrue. Neither White Hat nor any education management organization has that power.

These schools did file a lawsuit contending that this provision of the state charter law is unconstitutional. That case is pending in the Franklin County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas.

On June 30, 2010, an order was entered that the current arrangement between the present boards and White Hat Management will continue during the pending litigation until those issues are resolved. All parties consented to this arrangement.

In essence, this is a contract dispute between these boards and White Hat Management. Resolution of that contract dispute is a primary thrust of the plaintiffs’ litigation.

The Commentary’s recommended six points for strong governance are complied with by White Hat and its boards.

The sticking point between us and the author is whether a board is entitled to delegate all or part of its authority to provide services to the school. The board can and should set policy and then oversee the EMO’s progress in carrying this out. Boards are interested volunteers who seek good educational outcomes for the children in their schools.

The contract between the EMO and the board must lay out the respective responsibilities of each side. The boards cannot and must not try to run the day-to-day operations of the schools.

Charter schools do not generally have the capital necessary to start a new school. All 10 of these lawsuit schools were started from scratch. Under Ohio law, the several million dollars required to start a school is not available to the school.

In each of these schools, the startup capital was provided by White Hat Management.

For over 10 years, we have operated the schools under a management agreement which clearly defines our respective responsibilities.

Unfortunately, some trustees become unhappy with school operations from time to time and for various reasons, good and bad. These differences have to be resolved, so that the education of the children can continue. We have followed that path, and we will continue to do so.

David L. Brennan

Founder

White Hat Management Group LLC

Akron, Ohio

To the Editor:

Greg Richmond’s comments about the importance of charter school autonomy in choosing and working with education management organizations are valid, important, and timely (“Who’s in Charge at Charter Schools?,” Commentary, July 14, 2010). At EdisonLearning, we value his perspective and insights, and are committed to partnering with charter schools in ways that respect their independence and promote their strength.

Mr. Richmond’s six criteria for strong governance and oversight establish a baseline for a broader discussion of these issues. As a leading school management organization, we place a high priority on charter operations and autonomy, respecting the authority of charter boards to govern their schools. We know that strong, independent, and well-informed boards are an essential element of consistently high-quality charter schools.

Kudos to Mr. Richmond for sharing his insights on building strong management relationships and effective schools.

Jeff Wahl

President and Chief Executive Officer

EdisonLearning

New York, N.Y.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the August 11, 2010 edition of Education Week as Who’s in Charge at Charters?

Events

Classroom Technology Webinar Building Better Blended Learning in K-12 Schools
The pandemic and the increasing use of technology in K-12 education it prompted has added renewed energy to the blended learning movement as most students are now learning in school buildings (and will likely continue

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School & District Management Pandemic-Seasoned Principals Share Hard-Earned Leadership Lessons
The COVID crisis has tested principals’ resolve to an unprecedented degree, but many have gleaned valuable takeaways from the experience.
6 min read
Boat on the water with three people inside. Leader pointing  forward. In the water around them are coronavirus pathogens.
iStock/Getty Images Plus
School & District Management This Intensive Internship Helps Principals Get Ready For the Job
A two-year program in Columbus City Schools gives aspiring principals the chance to dive deep into the job before actually taking the reins.
10 min read
Sarah Foster, principal of North Linden Elementary School, talks with Katina Perry in Columbus, Ohio on November 30, 2021. Columbus City Schools has a program that lets principal “test out” the principal role, before actually fully taking it on. Through the program, they work in a school for two years under a mentor principal and fill in as principal at different schools during that time.
Katina Perry, right, principal of Fairmoor Elementary School in Columbus, Ohio, meets with Sarah Foster, principal of North Linden Elementary School and Perry's mentor in a school leader internship program.
Maddie McGarvey for Education Week
School & District Management Q&A School Libraries and Controversial Books: Tips From the Front Lines
A top school librarian explains how districts can prepare for possible challenges to student reading materials and build trust with parents.
6 min read
Image of library shelves of books.
mikdam/iStock/Getty
School & District Management Opinion ‘This Is Not What We Signed Up For’: A Principal’s Plea for More Support
School leaders are playing the role of health-care experts, social workers, mask enforcers, and more. It’s taking a serious toll.
Kristen St. Germain
3 min read
Illustration of a professional woman walking a tightrope.
Laura Baker/Education Week and uzenzen/iStock/Getty