Letter

What the NCTQ Report Misses

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

The article "You're More Likely to Pass the Bar Than an Elementary Teacher Licensing Exam" (March 5, 2019) covers "A Fair Chance," the report from the National Council on Teacher Quality about how teacher licensure exams disproportionately screen out aspiring teachers of color from the profession. This report, however, ignores all insights from the most important source: aspiring teachers of color themselves.

Studies sharing insights from these aspiring teachers demonstrate there is more to licensure exams than the report conveys. In 2006, Christine Bennett and colleagues found that Black and Latinx students who perform well on licensure exams have stronger ethnic identities than those who struggle on exams. In 2014 and 2015, I found the exams can become a racially charged experience related to intelligence, character, and test preparation for some African-American test-takers. All of these insights come from working directly with aspiring teachers of color.

Studies of this nature exceed the number of statistical studies on the topic—the only kind that "A Fair Chance" uses. The issue here is not about research methods, however, but about how this report misrepresents a delicate topic by overlooking the insights from people most affected by it. These studies exist in publications that are available to NCTQ researchers. How do we know this? Because NCTQ draws from other studies in these same databases and academic search engines.

The report's omission of insight from aspiring teachers of color directs attention away from any problems with these exams, the companies that make and profit from them, and policies that states set around them. The point here is not to cast blame. Complex problems have complex sources. But by limiting the scope of the issue, NCTQ would have the public believe the only way to diversify the teaching profession is for teacher education programs to wrap their curricula around these narrow exams.

Emery Petchauer
Associate Professor
Michigan State University
East Lansing, Mich.

Vol. 38, Issue 29, Page 20

Published in Print: April 17, 2019, as What the NCTQ Report Misses
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented