The Flawed Diagnosis of 'A Nation at Risk'

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Thomas Toch's call in his April 23 Commentary for turning attention back to "A Nation At Risk" diagnosis 35 years ago fails to reflect the fact that the data in that report have long since been proved to be wrong ("When It Comes to Public Education, the Nation Is Still at Risk"). And, that the approach—more requirements and much more testing and sanctions—was pursued for more than three decades with little success and a great deal of damage, especially to schools serving the students most in need of help.

The bipartisan rejection of No Child Left Behind recognized this failure. We need to support getting and keeping better teachers and reviving civil rights efforts against discrimination, poverty, and the underlying causes of educational inequality.

Gary Orfield
Graduate School of Education
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, Calif.

Vol. 37, Issue 30, Page 22

Published in Print: May 9, 2018, as The Flawed Diagnosis of 'A Nation at Risk'
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories