Minimizing the Need for Substitute Teachers

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editors:

I read with interest "Educators Take Another Look at Substitutes" (July 18, 2012). Three facts from the story stand out to me: Students almost always learn less when the regular teacher is not present; the rate of teacher absenteeism correlates to the culture of the school (and the absence rate is rising in many systems); and the total expenditure for substitutes is staggering.

I agree that employing permanent substitutes and using only "in-house, regular teacher subs" narrows the learning deficit somewhat. Beyond this analysis, however, is the fact that much of our substitute expense is self-inflicted.

Yes, there are illnesses and family emergencies that necessitate teacher absence. It seems to me, however, that we could do a better job of providing professional development for educators outside of student instructional time. Professional development should be scheduled on noninstructional days and during the summer. Such practices both decrease impediments to student achievement and serve to raise teacher salaries by paying them for their extra time. It also reduces the need for substitutes.

Patrick Durow
Assistant Professor of Education
Creighton University
Omaha, Neb.

Vol. 32, Issue 02, Page 20

Published in Print: August 29, 2012, as Minimizing the Need for Substitute Teachers
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories