Law & Courts

Texas Poised to Close Long Chapter on School Aid

By David J. Hoff — May 23, 2006 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

After several failed attempts, Texas is about to get a new school finance system.

Gov. Rick Perry said last week that he would sign the package of tax and appropriations bills that the legislature passed to meet the state supreme court’s June 1 deadline to rewrite Texas’ property-tax code and still adequately finance schools.

The measures also contain a series of policy changes that include a boost in teacher pay and additional course requirements for high school graduation.

“Because of this plan,” Gov. Perry, a Republican who is seeking re-election in November, said in a May 16 statement, “our schools will improve, our economy will grow, and our state will prosper.”

Some legal advocates and finance experts doubt, however, that the plan is a long-term solution. They note that it relies on the state’s $8.2 billion surplus for short-term financing and doesn’t provide enough tax revenues to pay for schools in future years.

“This is yet another quick-fix,” said David Hinojosa, a staff lawyer for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, one of the plaintiffs in the case arguing that the state inadequately finances its schools.

“They seem to be digging their own grave” for the future, he said, referring to the legislature.

Cuts and Increases

Working in response to last year’s Texas Supreme Court decision, the legislature convened last month in a special session to overhaul the school finance system.

In November, the court overturned a lower-court ruling that said the state inadequately financed its schools. But while the high court did not require the state to spend more on schools, it did order a revision of the tax system, which caps the amount districts can assess when taxing property and requires wealthy districts to share a portion of their revenues with poor districts.

The court ruled that the property-tax cap amounted to a statewide property tax—something the Texas Constitution prohibits. (“Texas School Finance Ruling Draws National Attention,” Dec. 7, 2005.)

Lawmakers had failed in their efforts to revise the finance program in their regular 2005 session and two special sessions last year, and in a special session in 2004.

But the task was made easier this year by a projected $8.2 billion surplus in the $72 billion budget for fiscal years 2006 and 2007.

The series of bills the legislature sent Gov. Perry last week would cut property taxes, close loopholes in a business tax, and raise cigarette taxes. At the same time, the package would increase K-12 spending by $1.8 billion in the next school year—about a 5 percent increase—with most of the money going toward a $2,000 teacher-pay raise and Mr. Perry’s plan to improve high schools.

In his statement, Mr. Perry said that, under the proposal, property-tax payers would save $15.7 billion over the next three years.

Under the revisions to the way property-tax revenues have been shared, $1 billion in tax revenues would stay in local communities rather than be redistributed across the state through what is known as the “Robin Hood” system.

Policy Changes

The bills would also make some significant policy changes.

They would create a $260 million pool to pay teachers bonuses based on their students’ achievement gains. The bonuses, worth as much as $10,000 each, would be distributed based on rules devised by local school districts. A mentoring program to help new teachers adjust to their jobs would also be started.

In addition, future students would be required to take four years of mathematics and four years of science to earn their diplomas. For a regular diploma, the state now requires three years of each subject.

While the governor and his allies bragged about their accomplishments last week, his opponents warned that the tax bills wouldn’t generate enough revenue to pay for all of the proposed K-12 programs.

Texas Comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn, an Independent candidate in this year’s gubernatorial election, estimates that the bills would fall $23 billion short of the revenue needed to pay for the bills’ programs over the next five years. The plan would use all of the state’s projected surplus to pay for the school finance program, she said in a letter to Gov. Perry.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the May 24, 2006 edition of Education Week as Texas Poised to Close Long Chapter on School Aid

Events

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Teens Drop Lawsuit Against Trump's Trans Sports Order After Supreme Court Ruling
The Supreme Court last month upheld state bans on transgender girls in school sports.
4 min read
Two teens challenging New Hampshire's new law banning transgender girls from girls' sports teams, Parker Tirrell, third from left, and Iris Turmelle, sixth from left, pose with their families and attorneys in Concord, N.H., Aug. 19, 2024.
Parker Tirrell, third from left, and Iris Turmelle, sixth from left, pose with their families and attorneys in Concord, N.H., Aug. 19, 2024. The teens initially sued over New Hampshire's law banning transgender girls from school sports teams, and later expanded their lawsuit to challenge President Donald Trump's February 2025 executive order threatening to withhold federal funds from schools that allow transgender girls to join girls' sports teams. They've since withdrawn the legal challenge following a Supreme Court ruling allowing states to ban transgender girls from sports under Title IX.
Holly Ramer/AP
Law & Courts What Schools Need to Know About the Supreme Court’s Transgender Sports Ruling
The justices upheld two state laws that bar transgender girls from participating in female sports.
10 min read
A group prays outside of the Supreme Court ahead of the court's ruling on whether transgender girls and women can play on school athletic teams, on June 30, 2026, on Capitol Hill in Washington.
A group prays outside of the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of the court's ruling on whether transgender girls and women can play on school athletic teams, on June 30, 2026, in Washington. The court upheld two state laws barring transgender girls from joining girls' school sports teams.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Law & Courts Judges Strike Down Trump Admin.'s Student Loan Forgiveness Overhaul
Two judges sided with advocates who said the program risked becoming a tool for political retribution.
3 min read
In this May 5, 2018, file photo, graduates at the University of Toledo commencement ceremony in Toledo, Ohio.
Graduates at the University of Toledo commencement ceremony in Toledo, Ohio, on May 5, 2018. Two judges have ruled against the Trump administration's overhaul of a public service loan forgiveness program for which teachers have qualified.
Carlos Osorio/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Rejecting Trump's Proposed Limits
The justices relied on the 14th Amendment and federal law to rule that anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen.
4 min read
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The Supreme Court justices will take the bench Monday, July 1, 2024, to release their last few opinions of the term, including their most closely watched case: whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from criminal prosecution.
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito, and Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The high court, on June 30, 2026, rejected President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP