Early Childhood

Intellectual Development Linked to Quality of Day Care

By Debra Viadero — April 16, 1997 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

New findings from an ongoing seven-year study offer reassurance for working parents: Day care, by itself, does not harm the intellectual development of children.

More important than the number of hours children spend in day care, the national study found, is the quality of care that infants and toddlers receive. Children whose caregivers respond and speak frequently to them learn to think and speak better than children in day-care settings with less warmth and verbal interaction.

But the researchers, working under the auspices of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, also found one drawback to putting infants in child care. The more hours that infants ages 6 months and younger spent away from their mothers, the less sensitive their mothers were to them as the children grew older. But the researchers said this effect was weak compared with their findings about quality of care.

“It was not enough to make a sensitive mother insensitive or to make an engaged mother disengaged,” said Robert Pianta, an associate professor education at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. “We’re talking about moving a mother and child a little more on a continuum.”

Array of Settings

Mr. Pianta is one of 29 investigators working on the study, which was launched by the NICHD, a part of the National Institutes of Health, in 1991 at a cost of $30 million. The researchers are tracking the progress of 1,394 children from 10 sites around the nation from shortly after the children were born until they reach 1st grade.

The families in the study are diverse, both in socioeconomic background and choice of child care. The study included children who were cared for by mothers, fathers, grandparents, nannies, family day-care providers, and workers at child-care centers.

In their first progress report last year, the researchers concluded that, at 15 months of age, children in child care were no less emotionally attached to their mothers than those who stayed with their mothers at home.

Their new findings, presented here April 3 during the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, are for children up to age 3. They focus on speaking and thinking skills and on the quality of children’s relationships with their mothers.

The issue of whether day care is harmful to children’s well-being has been a hot topic in recent years, given the increasingly larger percentage of mothers in the nation’s workforce. In 1980, 38 percent of all mothers with children younger than age 1 worked outside the home. Now, half of all women with infants work and most of these women return to work before their children are 6 months old.

A number of other studies have weighed in on the subject, with mixed conclusions. But the NICHD study is the largest and most comprehensive to date.

“Almost all of the other studies have taken children from within child-care centers. We sampled children at birth and followed them over time, so we’re seeing a different package,” said Kathryn Hirsh-Pasek, a psychology professor at Temple University in Philadelphia who is also on the study team.

Measuring Quality

Investigators on the project tested children and interviewed their families when the children were 6, 15, 24, and 36 months old. At the same intervals, they also videotaped interactions between mothers and their children and observed children in their day-care settings, counting the number of times, for example, that caregivers praised or talked to the children.

The research team defined “more positive child-care environments” as those where caregivers were more attentive and affectionate toward children, responding to their vocalizations, asking them questions, and talking to them.

Researchers said children in those high-quality environments performed better on cognitive and language tests at 15, 24, and 36 months of age. More positive caregiving also seemed to affect children’s relationships with their mothers, resulting in mothers who were more sensitive and involved with their children at 15 and 36 months.

Also, “when different types of care were equivalent, children in centers performed better on language and cognitive tests than children in other kinds of care,” added Aletha Huston, a professor of child development at the University of Texas at Austin and a study investigator.

The small negative effects of too many hours of child care on the relationship between mothers and their children also showed up across the children’s first three years of life--particularly among mothers who were not poor or suffering from depression.

When their children were 6 and 36 months old, mothers whose infants had spent the most hours in child care were deemed less sensitive to their children. The researchers made these judgments based on the videotaped sessions, noting, for example, when mothers did not respond to their children or intruded on their play. At 15 months, the mothers acted more negatively toward the children, according to the report.

Likewise, those children were less affectionate toward their mothers at 12 and 36 months of age.

But the researchers cautioned that their findings should be put in context. Although the quality of children’s care clearly mattered, it mattered less than some other factors, such as their families’ economic and emotional environment, their mothers’ mental health, and their own temperaments.

For More Information:

Information on the study is available from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 31 Center Drive, 9000 Rockville Pike, Mail Stop 2425, Room 2A32, Bethesda, Md.

Related Tags:

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Recruitment & Retention Webinar
Hiring, Retention, and Fill Rates: A Data-Driven Sub Strategy
Explore what keeps substitutes coming back and hear how one district rebuilt its substitute hiring process and improved its fill rate.
Content provided by Frontline Education
Early Childhood K-12 Essentials Forum Early Childhood Education: Building Essential Skills for Success
Join this free virtual event to examine the biggest challenges in supporting young children, from preschool through elementary school. 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Absenteeism Webinar
Attendance Isn't an Attendance Problem
Boost attendance by strengthening relationships, belonging, and support with practical strategies from Doug Fisher & Nancy Frey.
Content provided by Corwin

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Early Childhood Q&A If District Leaders Support Pre-K, Then Why Is It Not a Top Priority?
Superintendents can empower other leaders to nurture and grow their district's pre-K program.
6 min read
WASHINGTON,DC - JUNE 10: Dr. Aaron Spence, Superintendent, Loudoun County Public Schools and Dr. Macquline King, Superintendent and CEO of Chicago Public Schools speak during a House Education and Workforce Committee hearing titled “Breaking Trust: Attacks On Parental Rights, Inappropriate Content, And Legal Abuses In America’s Schools” on Capitol Hill on Wednesday, June 10, 2026 in Washington, DC.
Dr. Aaron Spence, Superintendent, Loudoun County Public Schools, and Dr. Macquline King, Superintendent and CEO of Chicago Public Schools, speak during a House Education and Workforce Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on June 10, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Superintendents believe pre-K is a priority for their districts, but it doesn't often translate to actively supporting early grades.
Jabin Botsford For Education Week
Early Childhood Q&A The Pre-K Push: Are Current Preschool Models Heading the Wrong Way?
Dale C. Farran has spent five decades studying early education, and shares her insights with EdWeek.
7 min read
In this Friday, March 13, 2020 photo, Pre-K students Nivayeh O'neal, 4, left, and Harper Lietchy, 5, go through the lunch line at Rivermont elementary school in Chattanooga, Tenn.
Pre-K students go through the lunch line at Rivermont Elementary School on March 13, 2020, in Chattanooga, Tenn. As a growing number of states plan to expand access to publicly funded pre-K, experts question its impact and direction.
Troy Stolt/Chattanooga Times Free Press via AP
Early Childhood Hey Diddle Diddle: What the Decline of Nursery Rhymes Means for Early Literacy
Nursery rhymes aren't just a quaint nod to the past: They're an engaging way to grow literacy skills.
5 min read
Nursery Rhymes, Disappearing, children's books, kids books, early childhood, early literacy
Illustration by Gina Tomko/Education Week + Canva
Early Childhood Opinion Finland Is a Model of Academic Success. The Reason Starts Earlier Than I Thought
Learning about community comes before academics in Finnish preschools, writes a teacher educator.
Marilyn M. DePietto
5 min read
Collage-style illustration of young Finnish students in snowsuits, a cut out image of the Supreme Court of Finland building, a map and flag of Finland, as well as two other students working with pencils on paper.
Illustration by Emily Wright for Education Week + Getty