Ten Imperatives for the Schools

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The reform strategy embodied in this policy statement can be characterized by the following ten imperatives for guiding the public schools:

1. Educational priorities should be better defined, and resources should be invested where the payoffs will be high. As a proportion of total spending, instruction requires a larger investment; administration and bureaucracy need less. Priority should be given to preschool programs for the disadvantaged and to programs that address the special educational needs of junior high school students.

2. Employability should not be confused with vocationalism. Employability requires problem-solving skills, command of the English language, self discipline, and the ability to acquire and apply knowledge.

3. The central purpose of education is to develop the potential of every student, regardless of race, sex, or physical handicap.

4. Teachers are professionals. They should be held to high standards and rewarded accordingly.

5. Parents are a critical component of successful public schools.

6. Greater trust should be placed in the initiative of individual schools. Teachers and administrators should have increased decision-making power.

7. States should refrain from excessive regulation, centralization, and control of the the schools. But they should set standards, monitor achievement, and intervene if schools fail to perform.

8. A new coalition to support the public schools is needed--one that joins business, labor, and civic leaders with parents, educators, and school boards.

9. Education research and development and its effective utilization should be given greater emphasis. There is a great deal that we do not yet know about education, and much of what we do know is not being applied in the classroom.

10. Business should make a long-term commitment to support the public schools. Companies should provide policy and project support and targeted funding, with the expectation that the schools will improve their performance. But business should not be expected to provide general funding for education beyond the taxes it pays to the community.

See also: Text of Report's Executive Summary.

Vol. 05, Issue 02, Page 17

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories