Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.
Opinion
Education Opinion

Will Free Education Technology Benefit the Rich? (@bjfr)

By Justin Reich — April 12, 2012 3 min read

My own contribution to the Hewlett Grantee Meeting was a
talk entitled “When Open Encounters Different Classrooms,” which is part of my
ongoing campaign to raise serious concerns about issues of equity and education
technology.

(Much more detailed papers, videos, and other descriptions
of this work can be found here)

The story goes something like this:

When we imagine an Open Educational Resources or education
technology ecosystem, one simple model is to assume that Builders make stuff,
put it on the Internet, and hope it gets to the brains of learners, either
directly or through facilitators like teachers, coaches and librarians.

We also assume that the net result of all this innovation is
increased learning: more neurons in young brains are rearranged in pro-social
ways.

This model might work for certain purposes (see the last
post
for the problems with dividing Builders from Facilitators). But in my talk
I propose an important amendment to that model for thinking about ed tech in
the U.S. One of the signature feature of the U.S. education system is that it
is profoundly inequitable. - America is known as being middle of
the pack in OECD rankings and so forth but that’s only on average, our
wealthiest students are on par with the best students in the world, but our
educational outcomes for poor students in the U.S. are shameful
.

So as I think about the model of OER systems in the United
States, I think about builders and the Internet, but on the other side of the Internet I
imagine two parallel sets of learners and facilitators in low-income and
high-income homes and schools. Now the hope, is that as builders create new OER
and edtech, it passes through a neo-liberal, democratizing Internet and can be
taken up by learners and facilitators in both kinds of environments

So if we amend our model of the OER system we also should
amend our model of learning. And my sense is that there are two kinds of
stories about how OER and education technology innovations are received in
schools serving different populations.

In one story, we imagine that we start with an initial
disparity in learning opportunities between wealthy and poor students caused by
an inequitable society. Wealthy students already have access to a wide variety
of proprietary resources, tools, platforms and so forth, and so OER and other
ed tech innovations disproportionately benefit low income students who now have
access to these free tools and resources. We can call this the closing gaps
scenario.

Another story we could tell, is that affluent schools have
much great human, social and technological capital than schools serving
low-income students. They have less test pressure, and their teachers have more
prep periods, fewer students, more curricular support, and better technological
infrastructure. Most new innovations, therefore, disproportionately benefit the
already advantaged. Technology acts as an accelerant to the underlying
inequities in schools. We might call this the rising tide scenario.

So which of these stories better represents reality? Well,
we don’t know for sure, but my research on wikis provides one perspective. In
my most recent study, I examined a random sample of wikis used in U.S., K-12 public
schools drawn from a population of nearly 200,000 wikis. I found that more
wikis are created in affluent schools than school serving low income students,
and wikis created in affluent schools are significantly more likely to provide
opportunities for students to develop 21st century skills and they
persist longer.

So with certainty in the case of wikis, these tools are
taken up in very different ways in different environments, and while wikis pass
from builders through the Internet into schools and homes in high income
neighborhoods, for a wide variety of reasons--technological, curricular,
pedagogical, and so forth--wikis aren’t taken up to the same degree in low
income neighborhoods.

In other words, the end result of an explosion of freely
available OER and education technology resources could be to widen the
opportunity gaps between wealthy and poor students.

So if we think that’s a problem, then we should not depend
on the Internet to be a democratizing, equalizing platform for distributing
learning tools and platforms. We need to think very carefully about how we can
design learning tools and distribution pathways that serve students with the
greatest needs.

Please follow me on Twitter at @bjfr and for more about my work, visit EdTechResearcher.org.

The opinions expressed in EdTech Researcher are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Branding Matters. Learn From the Pros Why and How
Learn directly from the pros why K-12 branding and marketing matters, and how to do it effectively.
Content provided by EdWeek Top School Jobs
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
How to Make Learning More Interactive From Anywhere
Join experts from Samsung and Boxlight to learn how to make learning more interactive from anywhere.
Content provided by Samsung
Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Head of Lower School
San Diego, California
San Diego Jewish Academy
Head of Lower School
San Diego, California
San Diego Jewish Academy
Project Manager (Contractor)
United States
K12 Inc.
Elementary Teacher
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read