Education Letter to the Editor

Talent Search Problems May Be Overstated

March 30, 2005 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

The opening paragraph in your article “Audit: Talent Search Participation Overstated” (March 2, 2005) makes it appear as if all Talent Search programs were found to have overstated their level of participation. In fact, the finding was only that three of the six grantees visited were deemed to have served fewer than the number of participants indicated in their grant applications. It is important to keep in mind that only six of 360 Talent Search programs nationwide (under 2 percent) were reported as having been audited.

Moreover, it is important to note that the U.S. Government Accountability Office was operating on a premise of what constituted a “participant” that was different from that of the U.S. Department of Education. In fact, the Department of Education had not defined what constituted a “participant” for Talent Search programs.

I also find it hard to believe that “none [of the programs] could provide documents to support the number of participants it claimed to have served during 2001-02.” That suggests that these programs may have served no eligible students. That would not seem to be the case, given your statement that, according to the GAO draft report, “only three of the six grantees failed to serve the required minimum of 600 participants.”

Because of the lack of adequate guidance from the Education Department to grantees, as well as other administrative problems, the validity of the GAO’s audit may be suspect. An entire program should not be condemned because of government failure to provide adequate guidance, policy, and consistency in its administration.

Talent Search, as well as other TRIO programs, have provided a multitude of services to low-income, first-generation college students despite the odds set against them. The administrative situation is improving, and I am confident that with continued progress toward better communication of policy and procedure, the fog of confusion that has surrounded the program will be lifted.

Paula J. Martin

New York, N.Y.


Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Science of Reading: Emphasis on Language Comprehension
Dive into language comprehension through a breakdown of the Science of Reading with an interactive demonstration.
Content provided by Be GLAD
English-Language Learners Webinar English Learners and the Science of Reading: What Works in the Classroom
ELs & emergent bilinguals deserve the best reading instruction! The Reading League & NCEL join forces on best practices. Learn more in our webinar with both organizations.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated: February 7, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated: January 31, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated: January 17, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education In Their Own Words The Stories That Stuck With Us, 2023 Edition
Our newsroom selected five stories as among the highlights of our work. Here's why.
4 min read
102523 IMSE Reading BS
Adria Malcolm for Education Week