Opinion
Education Letter to the Editor

Questions for Congress on Reading Plan

April 10, 2007 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

Members of Congress need to take a magnifying glass to your recent article “Out-of-Favor Reading Plan Rated Highly” (March 28, 2007). Then, our representatives need to find answers to these questions:

(1.) Why were former National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and U.S. Department of Education officials overzealous in their need to steer federal funding away from teacher training to address emerging reading problems and toward largely phonics-oriented “products” (whether testing products or textbooks)?

(2.) What would it mean to the former NICHD and Education Department officials (and children everywhere) if the answer to the first question is that training of teachers in “other strategies” is more effective for reading development than intensive phonics instruction?

(3.) What motivated these NICHD and Education Department officials to place a virtual chokehold on the definition of “scientifically based” reading programs by narrowing the view to nearly-impossible-to-meet phonics-related criteria? And, what effect has this narrowness had on new, cutting-edge nonphonics-related solutions to reading problems?

From top to bottom, the whole thing smacks of “high jinks” (a term used by the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation-funded report written by Louisa Moats to reprimand educators who support a broader view of literacy; is it a coincidence that President Bush’s former education secretary, Rod Paige, sits on the Fordham board of trustees?).

Congress: Please investigate. Every single day, more children in this country are harmed by policies put in place to support nothing but intensive phonics instruction. From day one, this policy approach has been narrow and negligent.

Rhonda Stone

Shelton, Wash.

A version of this article appeared in the April 11, 2007 edition of Education Week as Questions for Congress On Reading Plan

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
Strategies for Incorporating SEL into Curriculum
Empower students to thrive. Learn how to integrate powerful social-emotional learning (SEL) strategies into the classroom.
Content provided by Be GLAD
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Leadership in Education: Building Collaborative Teams and Driving Innovation
Learn strategies to build strong teams, foster innovation, & drive student success.
Content provided by Follett Learning
School & District Management K-12 Essentials Forum Principals, Lead Stronger in the New School Year
Join this free virtual event for a deep dive on the skills and motivation you need to put your best foot forward in the new year.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated: June 12, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated: May 29, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated: May 8, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated: April 17, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read