Opinion
Education Letter to the Editor

Policymakers Should Look to History

May 08, 2012 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

Clearly, some educators and politicians hope the public’s historical memory goes back no further than a few weeks. At least that’s what can be drawn from the new policy scheme to test “elementary teachers’ knowledge of the science of reading,” based on the findings of the report of the National Reading Panel (“Separate Reading Exams Await Would-Be Elementary Teachers,” April 18, 2012).

However, has everyone forgotten that less than six months ago, the National Assessment of Educational Progress reported that reading scores have remained flat since the introduction of Reading First, the instructional core of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001? And what was Reading First based upon? Hmmm ... oh, yes ... the 2000 NRP Report!

How can this proposed testing scheme proceed as though this history never existed? How can the scheme plan to test teachers on their ability to employ a pseudoscientific, “big five” method (first teach phonological awareness, then phonics, etc.) that produced the NAEP reading outcomes?

The damage to children’s reading development evolved first because educators and policymakers who supported NCLB obstinately rejected the substantive criticism by reading experts that debunked this so-called scientific instruction. Yet because of the extent and depth of the criticism, educators who were funded by programs subsequently developed under President George W. Bush sought out a supportive document for their cause. The NRP report—which was released during the last full year of the Clinton presidency—handily provided justification for the implementation of NCLB pedagogy.

This reprise of deplorable policy and “evidence” disconcertingly recalls Bob Dylan’s lines asking “what price/ You have to pay to get out of/ Going through all these things twice.” The price will, of course, be paid by tomorrow’s students.

Gerald Coles

Rochester, N.Y.

Gerald Coles is a full-time researcher, writer, and lecturer on the psychology and politics of literacy and education.

A version of this article appeared in the May 09, 2012 edition of Education Week as Policymakers Should Look to History

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
The Future of the Science of Reading
Join us for a discussion on the future of the Science of Reading and how to support every student’s path to literacy.
Content provided by HMH
Mathematics K-12 Essentials Forum Helping Students Succeed in Math
Student Well-Being Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: The Power of Emotion Regulation to Drive K-12 Academic Performance and Wellbeing
Wish you could handle emotions better? Learn practical strategies with researcher Marc Brackett and host Peter DeWitt.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Quiz Trump’s Surprise Freeze on School Funding—How Much Do You Know?
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz What Lowers Teacher Turnover? Take This Weekly Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz Which State Is About to Pass a ‘Science of Reading’ Law? Take This Weekly Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz What is a Project 2025 Author Doing at the Education Department? Take This Weekly Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read