Opinion
Education Opinion

Can Schools Discipline Students for Social Media Use Outside of School?

March 19, 2018 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

It seems like only yesterday that we were eager for America Online to connect us to the Internet.

Those were the days—simpler times—when the main notification you had to worry about was, “You’ve got mail!” Now, social media allows anyone, including students, to make any part of life much more public.

Let’s face it. There is no shortage of headlines about student voice making waves.

From social justice campaigns, to controversial photos or videos, students’ social media posts can all rile up some strong reactions. Despite the opportunity social media gives student voice, unlike on-campus (and offline) speech, the Internet blurs lines that would otherwise delineate where student speech would be protected.

In fact, some seemingly-inappropriate activity may in certain instances, especially with off-campus online speech, be forms of protected student expression. That’s because at the intersection of school authority and student social media use, you will find the traffic light of Free Speech.

Though the issue of student social media use in school has been somewhat curtailed by clearer school policies and educators’ diligence, what remains a challenge is how educators address off-campus online student speech that would otherwise be prohibited on campus.

The First Amendment and Online Expression

More than ever before, it is crucial that educators know how the Constitution applies to student expression. They must be certain they are meeting their loco parentis obligation and ensuring students’ Constitutional right to free expression.

In general, under the First Amendment what is protected expression offline is still protected online, even in schools and even for students—and that applies to social media. However, there are reasonable limitations to the First Amendment guarantees for students offline and in schools. Thus, student social media use, as a form of expression, can be subject to those same limitations.

That means a form of student speech online would be considered protected under the First Amendment if the same expression were protected in traditional offline format.

What’s more, if a student’s expression or speech would not otherwise be protected offline, then its online iteration can also be subject to consequences if outlined by school policy, or state or federal statutes governing the behavior.

The following court decisions can help educators navigate issues of online off-campus student speech while ensuring Constitutional rights are upheld. They highlight when schools could discipline a student for their social media use, including instances where:


  1. There is a legitimate and compelling state interest, such as a violation of a code of conduct established by school policy. (Tatro v. University of Minnesota, 2012)
  2. The social media content is directed at the school community in some way that could reasonably be understood to be threatening. (Bell v. Itawamba County School Board, 2015)
  3. It could potentially cause a substantive and material disruption to the educational process. (Tinker v. Des Moines, 1969)
  4. It promotes illegal activity, such as illegal drug or alcohol use, theft, etc. (Morse v. Frederick, 2007)
  5. If the content is obscene, lewd, or plainly offensive, vulgar, indecent, racist, or otherwise inappropriate in a school setting, e.g., sexually suggestive. (Bethel Sch. Dist. No. 403 v. Fraser, 1986)

What Educators Need to Know

In general, students have the right to freedom of expression unless it infringes on the rights of others, school safety, or interferes with the ability of a school to deliver its educational services and processes. Thus, off-campus online expression would be protected in the same way as traditional speech.

We must protect First Amendment rights of students while also recognizing that schools do have some ability, under very limited circumstances, to discipline students for off-campus speech.

As such, the crucial question for educators still remains: “When should I speak up?”

Where the First Amendment protection becomes more limited, or school authority takes precedence, is when educators need to say something. Some instances of student social media use, including that which is off-campus, amount to misconduct that can be disciplined according to school policy.

Let an administrator know about student social media use that:


  • Breaches school policy.
  • Leads to or creates substantial disruption to the educational process.
  • Results in bullying toward students or staff.
  • Threatens school violence.

Ultimately, with the great power of social media comes great responsibility. Whether online or offline, on-site or off-campus, student communication in the digital era is still plainly a First Amendment issue. We must keep that in mind.

Gary G. Abud, Jr. is an educational consultant, speaker, and writer near Detroit. His work currently focuses on helping kids with ADHD to succeed in school by offering coaching and workshops to educators, students, and families. Previously, Gary has served students in K-12 schools as a STEM teacher, curriculum specialist, and principal. In 2014, he was selected as the Michigan Teacher of the Year.

Photo by Flickr user Dick Thomas Johnson, licensed under Creative Commons.

The opinions expressed in Teacher-Leader Voices are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Classroom Technology Webinar
Academic Integrity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
As AI writing tools rapidly evolve, learn how to set standards and expectations for your students on their use.
Content provided by Turnitin
Recruitment & Retention Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Chronic Teacher Shortage: Where Do We Go From Here?  
Join Peter DeWitt, Michael Fullan, and guests for expert insights into finding solutions for the teacher shortage.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
The Science of Reading: Tools to Build Reading Proficiency
The Science of Reading has taken education by storm. Learn how Dr. Miranda Blount transformed literacy instruction in her state.
Content provided by hand2mind

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Letter to the Editor EdWeek's Most-Read Letters of 2022
Here are this year’s top five Letters to the Editor.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week
Education In Their Own Words Withstanding Trauma, Leading With Honesty, and More: The Education Stories That Stuck With Us
Our journalists highlight why stories on the impact of trauma on schooling and the fallout of the political discourse on race matter to the field.
4 min read
Kladys Castellón prays during a vigil for the victims of a mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, on Tuesday, May 24, 2022.
Kladys Castellón prays during a vigil for the victims of a mass shooting at Robb Elementary School.
Billy Calzada/The San Antonio Express-News via AP
Education In Their Own Words Masking, Miscarriages, and Mental Health: The Education Stories That Stuck With Us
Our reporters share the stories they wrote that rose above the fray—and why.
5 min read
Crystal Curtis and her son, Jordan Curtis, outside their home in Plano, Texas. Crystal, a healthcare professional whose son attends school in Plano talks about the challenges of ensuring quality schooling, her discomfort with the state and district’s rollback of mandatory masking, and the complications of raising a Black child in a suburban district as policies shift.
Crystal Curtis and her son, Jordan Curtis, outside their home in Plano, Texas. Crystal, a healthcare professional whose son attends school in Plano talks about the challenges of ensuring quality schooling, her discomfort with the state and district’s rollback of mandatory masking, and the complications of raising a Black child in a suburban district as policies shift.
Allison V. Smith for Education Week
Education Opinion The Top 10 Rick Hess Straight Up Columns of 2022
NAEP, pre-K, who decides what gets taught. Those are among the most popular or impactful posts of the year.
2 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty