Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.

Justices Weigh Arizona Immigration Law

By Mark Walsh — April 25, 2012 2 min read

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared inclined to back the state of Arizona on at least one provision of its controversial immigration law.

“Arizona is not trying to kick out anybody that the federal government has not already said do not belong here,” said Justice Antonin Scalia. It was one of the justice’s nicer comments on illegal immigration during the arguments in Arizona v. United States (Case No. 11-182).

The case is being watched closely by educators in the state and elsewhere, such as in Alabama, whose similar anti-illegal-immigration law goes further in several respects, including a requirement that schools check students’ citizenship status.

Other justices were more measured in their comments, but there appeared to be little support among the eight participating justices (Justice Elena Kagan is recused) for blocking a provision of Arizona’s law that requires police to determine the immigration status of those they stop or arrest if they have a reasonable suspicion of that the person is in the United States illegally.

U.S. Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. said Arizona’s statute amounts to an effort by the state to enforce federal law in the immigration arena.

“Under the Constitution, it’s the president and the executive branch that are responsible for the enforcement of federal law,” Verrilli said.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. told Verrilli at he didn’t see Arizona’s provision as a state effort to enforce federal immigration law.

“It is an effort to let you know about violations of federal law,” Roberts said. “Whether or not to enforce them is still entirely up to you.”

Even Justice Sonia Sotomayor, a member of the court’s liberal bloc, told Verrilli at one point that one of his key arguments was “not selling very well” with the court.

The arguments focused intensely on the provisions of Arizona’s law. There were limited hypothethicals, and the justices did not get into ideas such as the student citizenship checks that are part of Alabama’s law. (Among those in attendance Wednesday was Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange, who issued a statement saying he was “cautiously optimistic that the Supreme Court will recognize that the states can play an important role in assisting the federal government in fulfilling its responsibility to enforce the immigration laws of this country.”)

As I noted in this post on Tuesday, there are concerns that the Arizona statute itself would have harmful effects on undocumented students.

The justices on Wednesday appeared more skeptical of provisions of SB 1070 that would make it a violation of state law for aliens not to carry identification documents and would make it a crime for illegal immigrants to seek work.

Roberts told Paul D. Clement, the lawyer defending Arizona’s law, that the work measure seemed to impose “significantly greater sanctions” than those included in federal law for similar violations.

Earlier in the argument, Clement said that “the state of Arizona bears a disproportionate share of the costs of illegal immigration.” As the state’s brief makes clear, those include the costs of educating undocumented immigrants.

The case was the last of the Supreme Court’s 2011-12 term to be argued. A decision is expected by late June.

A version of this news article first appeared in The School Law Blog.


Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
The 4 Biggest Challenges of MTSS During Remote Learning: How Districts Are Adapting
Leaders share ways they have overcome the biggest obstacles of adapting a MTSS or RTI framework in a hybrid or remote learning environment.
Content provided by Panorama Education
Student Well-Being Online Summit Keeping Students and Teachers Motivated and Engaged
Join experts to learn how to address teacher morale, identify students with low engagement, and share what is working in remote learning.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Join us for our NBOE 2021 Winter Teacher Virtual Interview Fair!
Newark, New Jersey
Newark Public Schools
Special Education Teacher
Chicago, Illinois
JCFS Chicago
Assistant Director of Technical Solutions
Working from home
EdGems Math LLC

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read