Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.
Education

California Legislators Cite NCLB’s Flaws

October 02, 2007 1 min read

As I’ve mentioned before, the road to NCLB’s reauthorization in the House goes through California. Both the chairman and senior Republican on the education committee and the Speaker of the House all represent the Golden State. Throw in the other 50 House members representing California’s interests, and you have to pay attention to the politics there.

To that end, take note of Assembly Joint Resolution 23 that passed both chambers of the California legislature last month. It includes common complaints about the law. Not flexible enough. Inadequately funded. Too dependent on reading and math scores. But it also introduces a new wrinkle: Parents should be allowed to pull their children out of testing without schools suffering under the accountability system. The resolution passed by wide margins in both chambers.

Also check out this letter that a group state legislators sent Speaker Pelosi last month. “Specifically,” it says, “we find totally unacceptable the provisions that would implement an ill-conceived and counterproductive pay-for-performance or ‘merit pay’ plan.” (Note that the California Teachers Association has been helpful enough to post it for us.) The letter adds that the proposal “would place even more undue emphasis on test scores, create new sanctions for struggling schools, [and] undermine local control.”

Listen closely to what House members, particularly Democrats, say about teacher pay under NCLB in coming months. I’m betting you might hear the words “ill-conceived” and “counterproductive.”

P.S. The CTA Web site doesn’t name the legislators that signed the letter to Pelosi. I’m trying to get the list. I’ll post it when I do.

A version of this news article first appeared in the NCLB: Act II blog.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Branding Matters. Learn From the Pros Why and How
Learn directly from the pros why K-12 branding and marketing matters, and how to do it effectively.
Content provided by EdWeek Top School Jobs
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
How to Make Learning More Interactive From Anywhere
Join experts from Samsung and Boxlight to learn how to make learning more interactive from anywhere.
Content provided by Samsung
Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

BASE Program Site Director
Thornton, CO, US
Adams 12 Five Star Schools
Director of Information Technology
Montpelier, Vermont
Washington Central UUSD
Great Oaks AmeriCorps Fellow August 2021 - June 2022
New York City, New York (US)
Great Oaks Charter Schools
Director of Athletics
Farmington, Connecticut
Farmington Public Schools

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read