School & District Management

Cincinnati Board Backs School-Overhaul Plan, Despite Union Protests

By Caroline Hendrie — January 15, 1997 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Over the strong objections of the local teachers’ union, the Cincinnati school board has given final approval to a five-year strategic plan aimed at profoundly changing the way the school district does business.

The reform blueprint, which is unusually broad in its scope, calls for reconfiguring schools and redistributing power over budgeting, staffing, and instruction to the school and classroom levels.

The plan has attracted interest beyond Ohio in part because Cincinnati is one of eight cities and two states testing reform programs developed by New American Schools, a national business-backed reform project based in Arlington, Va. (“Cincinnati Eyes Top-to-Bottom Restructuring,” Oct. 23, 1996.)

The final version of the plan, adopted by the city’s school board last month, revised a draft proposal approved in August. But those changes have failed to ease the severe strain that the plan has put on relations between the Cincinnati Federation of Teachers and officials of the 50,000-student district.

Opposition to some of the reforms has become a major sticking point in the negotiations over a teachers’ contract to replace the one that expired Dec. 31.

“The hot-button issues all relate to the strategic plan,” said Tom Mooney, the president of the union.

Specialty Jobs an Issue

Among other provisions, the plan calls for eliminating middle schools in favor of K-8 schools, combining grade levels into multiage classrooms, and requiring all schools to adopt a research-based design for school reform. The district is encouraging but not requiring schools to consider the New American Schools designs.

In a shift affecting all but the 11th and 12th grades, teachers will be grouped into teams that will be responsible for a particular group of students, preferably one composed of children of different ages and grade levels.

A team will stay with students for more than a single year and will be responsible for ensuring that the youngsters meet the district’s academic standards for progressing to the next level.

At the heart of the clash between the union and the district is a feature that will allow each school to decide whether to employ specialized staff members, including art, music, and physical education teachers as well as librarians, psychologists, speech pathologists, and social workers.

The teachers’ contract adopted in 1993 requires schools to employ such specialists, and the union sees those guarantees as a protection against stripping schools of needed programs and services.

But the district wants to allow schools to allocate their resources differently. For example, a school might decide to reduce class sizes or hire extra math instructors rather than maintain a full-time physical education teacher.

The district wants such decisions to reside with newly created “instructional leadership teams,” which will be composed of the principal, parents, support-staff representatives, and various teachers, including the leader of each teacher team, a special education teacher, and a representative of the school’s specialists.

The union, on the other hand, has taken the stance that schools should not be allowed to eliminate specialty positions unless two-thirds of the faculty votes to do so.

Specter of Cutbacks

The union ran radio ads and sent a letter to parents last fall charging that the reform plan was a thinly disguised attempt to trim spending. Union members also obtained 2,500 signatures on a petition protesting the district’s stance. “The superintendent and board call this reform,” Mr. Mooney, the CFT president, said last month. “We believe it simply paves the way for more cuts.”

In an effort to dispel the specter of such cuts, district negotiators last month pledged to maintain funding for the specialized services to all schools through at least 1999. But they held fast to their position that the instructional leadership teams should be given flexibility over how to spend that money.

“Despite scare tactics by some, art, music, and physical education will be taught in our schools,” Superintendent J. Michael Brandt said on Dec. 9, the day the board unanimously approved the revised plan. “This is not a budget-cutting plan.”

In a move criticized strongly by the union, the district decided last month to bring in state labor officials to help resolve the impasse. Last week, the union organized a forum for parents and teachers at which union leaders began trying to organize opposition to the four of seven board members whose seats are up for grabs in November.

Related Tags:

Events

Ed-Tech Policy Webinar Artificial Intelligence in Practice: Building a Roadmap for AI Use in Schools
AI in education: game-changer or classroom chaos? Join our webinar & learn how to navigate this evolving tech responsibly.
Education Webinar Developing and Executing Impactful Research Campaigns to Fuel Your Ed Marketing Strategy 
Develop impactful research campaigns to fuel your marketing. Join the EdWeek Research Center for a webinar with actionable take-aways for companies who sell to K-12 districts.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Privacy & Security Webinar
Navigating Cybersecurity: Securing District Documents and Data
Learn how K-12 districts are addressing the challenges of maintaining a secure tech environment, managing documents and data, automating critical processes, and doing it all with limited resources.
Content provided by Softdocs

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School & District Management Opinion A Good Principal Knows When It's Time to Leave
I didn’t leave my job because of burnout; I stepped away from being a school leader because it was in everybody’s best interest.
Matthew Ebert
4 min read
Conceptual illustration of someone handing off a baton to someone else over a completed puzzle.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week via Canva
School & District Management Principals Tell Politicians on Capitol Hill: We’re Burning Out
Students' mental health top principals' growing list of concerns.
6 min read
People walk outside the U.S Capitol building in Washington, June 9, 2022.
Visitors walk outside the U.S Capitol building in Washington on June 9, 2022.
Patrick Semansky/AP
School & District Management Women Superintendents Experience Bias on the Climb to Leadership
Interpersonal slights and inequities make it hard for women to land the job and stay in it.
3 min read
Woman stands in front of a staircase in different colors. She is about to walk up the stairs. Concept of standing in front of a challenge and finding the right solution and courage to move on.
mikkelwilliam/E+
School & District Management Fewer of Today's Superintendents Are at Retirement Age
A new survey of superintendents adds to what we know about the people who lead the nation's school districts.
4 min read
Conceptual illustration of money, salaries and data.
iStock/Getty