Assessment

Some Question Inconsistencies in Clinton Testing Proposal

By Millicent Lawton — April 24, 1996 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

When President Clinton proposed in a speech to the nation’s governors and corporate leaders that states require students to pass a test to move to the next grade or to graduate from high school, he raised a few eyebrows.

Mr. Clinton spoke at last month’s education summit in Palisades, N.Y., which focused on how to establish higher academic standards and better assessments to measure students’ progress toward those goals, as well as how to better use technology to improve education. Forty governors and 49 corporate leaders attended. (See Education Week, April 3, 1996.)

In his speech, the president said that in order to have meaningful standards, every state must mandate a test for students to make the transition from, for example, elementary to middle school or from middle school to high school, or to receive a high school diploma.

To some observers, Mr. Clinton’s speech was inconsistent with administration policy.

The Goals 2000: Educate America Act--the administration’s chief K-12 education initiative, which the president signed into law two years ago--included a prohibition on such high-stakes tests. The law says states that use Goals 2000 money to develop assessments aligned with high standards cannot use those tests for purposes such as grade promotion and graduation for five years.

But that testing provision was one the Clinton administration consistently opposed, said John F. Jennings, a former general counsel to the Democratic-controlled House education committee.

Mr. Jennings, now the director of the Center on National Education Policy in Washington, said last week that in order to secure support for the bill, the administration had to go along with the provision, one of the demands of liberal Democrats on the committee.

“The administration very reluctantly had to accept it,” he said.

The idea behind the testing provision, according to those familiar with the legislation, was to give states time to thoughtfully implement rigorous academic standards and curricular changes. The five-year delay was supposed to ensure that states would have time to devise appropriate assessments.

Mr. Jennings added that the provision should have no real impact on the governors at the summit, who agreed to set internationally competitive standards and assessments within two years, because the five-year prohibition will have passed or nearly so.

OCR and Ohio

Mr. Clinton’s proposal also raised hackles for another reason.

The president’s endorsement of high-stakes testing was a contradiction of the U.S. Department of Education’s 1994 investigation of Ohio’s high school exit examination, argued Chester E. Finn Jr., a fellow at the Indianapolis-based Hudson Institute and a top department official in the Reagan administration.

In the investigation, the department’s first into a state’s exit test, the office for civil rights looked into complaints that minority students were failing the test in disproportionate numbers.

After a seven-month investigation, the OCR agreed that the test was not racially discriminatory. But the agreement between the OCR and Ohio seemed to indicate that the agency would continue to hold states responsible for adequately preparing students to take any such tests. (See Education Week, Oct. 12, 1994.)

Officials at the civil-rights agency are looking into a similar discrimination complaint filed in Texas against that state’s exit exam but are trying to resolve the situation without a full investigation, an OCR spokesman said. (See Education Week, Feb. 7, 1996.)

Currently, 17 states use minimum-competency examinations, most of which are a requirement for high school graduation, according to the Council of Chief State School Officers in Washington.

In his speech, the president called for tests that measure students’ knowledge and skills beyond minimum-competency levels.

Mr. Finn, a summit attendee, said the Ohio probe sent a signal meant to dissuade other states from trying the same kind of testing. “All of the natural inclinations of the office for civil rights ... militate against high-stakes testing of exactly the kind that Bill Clinton was recommending.”

Others disagreed. To say that the administration was being inconsistent because of the actions of the OCR “would be to suggest that you can only propose high-stakes tests if you don’t hold states accountable for educating kids to the test and making sure the tests are valid and not used unfairly,” said Paul Weckstein, a co-director of the Center for Law and Education in Washington, which advocates on behalf of low-income families and others. “That, to me, suggests some other folks are being hypocritical.”

Events

Ed-Tech Policy Webinar Artificial Intelligence in Practice: Building a Roadmap for AI Use in Schools
AI in education: game-changer or classroom chaos? Join our webinar & learn how to navigate this evolving tech responsibly.
Education Webinar Developing and Executing Impactful Research Campaigns to Fuel Your Ed Marketing Strategy 
Develop impactful research campaigns to fuel your marketing. Join the EdWeek Research Center for a webinar with actionable take-aways for companies who sell to K-12 districts.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Privacy & Security Webinar
Navigating Cybersecurity: Securing District Documents and Data
Learn how K-12 districts are addressing the challenges of maintaining a secure tech environment, managing documents and data, automating critical processes, and doing it all with limited resources.
Content provided by Softdocs

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment The 5 Burning Questions for Districts on Grading Reforms
As districts rethink grading policies, they consider the purpose of grades and how to make them more reliable measures of learning.
5 min read
Grading reform lead art
Illustration by Laura Baker/Education Week with E+ and iStock/Getty
Assessment As They Revamp Grading, Districts Try to Improve Consistency, Prevent Inflation
Districts have embraced bold changes to make grading systems more consistent, but some say they've inflated grades and sent mixed signals.
10 min read
Close crop of a teacher's hands grading a stack of papers with a red marker.
E+
Assessment Opinion What's the Best Way to Grade Students? Teachers Weigh In
There are many ways to make grading a better, more productive experience for students. Here are a few.
14 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
iStock/Getty
Assessment Spotlight Spotlight on Assessment
This Spotlight will help you evaluate effective ways to offer students feedback, learn how to improve assessments for ELs, and more.