Title I Provisions Designed To Promote Local Flexibility Spur Anxiety

New Orleans

Provisions of the new Title I law intended to give school districts more flexibility are generating anxiety among some educators, who fear the federal promises of increased latitude may prove too good to be true.

Since Congress began work on revamping the compensatory-education program in 1993, federal officials have promoted local decisionmaking and flexibility. The Department of Education intentionally issued relatively sparse rules. (See Education...

This article is available to subscribers only.

To keep reading this article and more, subscribe now or purchase this article.

Already have an account? Please login.

Subscribe to Education Week and Save

Get a full year and save up to 45%!

Premium Online + Print

37 issues + Online Access
$89

You Save 45%

SUBSCRIBE NOW

(See details.)

Premium Online

12 Months Online Access
$74

You Save 38%

SUBSCRIBE NOW

(See details.)

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsored Whitepapers

• E-Policy Essentials for Schools, Write a Definitive Acceptable Use Policy

• Math Intervention - From Best Practice to Next Practice

• Motivation & Personalization: Middle School Math

• Teaching Self-Regulation Skills to Close the Income-Based Achievement Gap

• Can response systems improve learning outcomes?

• Unique Challenges Facing K-12 IT Professionals

• 10 Steps for Migrating Curriculum to Common Core

• The Educational Promise of Social Media

• Broad Knowledge Drives Literacy

• Using Collaboration to Impact Teaching & Learning

• Data Systems That Help Schools Make a Difference

• Great Books Programs Fit the CCSS

MORE EDUCATION JOBS >>
Post a Job >>

Sponsored Advertiser Links