Standards

Study: Some Elementary Math Textbooks Are Better Than Others

By Jaclyn Zubrzycki — January 08, 2017 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The current approach to curricular resources in the United States might seem to indicate that the textbooks any given school uses doesn’t matter much. Many states and districts don’t know what textbooks are currently being used in their schools. Others opt to allow each school to select its own academic program. In some schools, teachers have been asked to draft units and lessons from scratch and skip textbooks altogether.

But a research effort in California offers evidence that which math textbook a school chooses to use actually has a significant impact on academic performance.

Researchers Cory Koedel, an associate professor of economics and public policy at the University of Missouri, and Morgan Polikoff, an associate professor of education at the University of Southern California’s Rossier School of Education, examined math scores on the state’s standardized tests in elementary schools that were using the four most popular math textbooks in the state between 2008 and 2013.

They used information from the state’s School Accountability Report Cards to create a database of school textbook adoption. The analysis includes 1,878 schools that used the four most popular texts: Houghton Mifflin’s California Math, Pearson Scott Foresman’s enVisionMATH California McGraw Hill’s California Mathematics: Concepts, Skills, and Problem Solving, and Houghton Mifflin Harcourt’s California HSP Math.

One text, Houghton Mifflin’s California Math, was consistently associated with higher performance in grades 3, 4, and 5 than the other three books, taking into account factors like the schools’ prior performance and students’ demographic characteristics.

This study doesn’t probe what it was exactly about this book that led to higher results. Was it something about the content it covered? Its alignment with state standards or the assessment? Its ease of use? And the book that did so well in the analysis is no longer sold in California.

But it does include a call for more states and districts to collect this sort of information so educators can make more informed decisions about curriculum and researchers can eventually probe why some books seem to be more effective.

Koedel and Polikoff write that there are good reasons for considering the impact of textbooks: Most schools adopt textbooks and use them as part of day-to-day instruction; research so far has indicated that textbooks do have an impact on student achievement; textbooks are less expensive than other approaches to school improvement; and curricular materials are (usually) less politically fraught than other school reforms.

Just two states—Florida and Indiana—collected information about what books were being used at the time of this study. In California, the information was available but difficult to compile and analyze, the researchers write.

Koedel and Polikoff are now collecting information about textbooks in Texas, Illinois, New York, and Florida, and plan to continue to study the effects of textbook adoption.

Polikoff and Koedel are echoing Grover J. “Russ” Whitehurst and Matthew Chingos, who called for more research into instructional materials in 2012. And in a recent opinion piece in U.S. News & World Report, Charles Sahm, the director of education policy at the Manhattan Institute, writes that there’s a growing body of evidence that the curriculum schools use matters. Sahm points to research from Harvard professor Thomas Kane, who found that high-quality curricular materials had a greater effect than teacher’s experience level on students’ academic progress.

This focus on the quality and impact of curriculum comes at a moment when many teachers are developing their own lessons or supplementing their prescribed curricula more than ever with materials from the internet and various open educational resources.


Related stories:


For more news and information on curriculum and instruction:

And sign up here to get alerts in your email inbox when stories are published on Curriculum Matters.

Related Tags:

A version of this news article first appeared in the Curriculum Matters blog.


Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
6 Key Trends in Teaching and Learning
As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and a return to the classroom for many—we come better prepared, but questions remain. How will the last year impact teaching and learning this school
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Ensuring Continuity of Learning: How to Prepare for the Next Disruption
Across the country, K-12 schools and districts are, again, considering how to ensure effective continuity of learning in the face of emerging COVID variants, politicized debates, and more. Learn from Alexandria City Public Schools superintendent
Content provided by Class
Teaching Profession Live Online Discussion What Have We Learned From Teachers During the Pandemic?
University of California, Santa Cruz, researcher Lora Bartlett and her colleagues spent months studying how the pandemic affected classroom teachers. We will discuss the takeaways from her research not only for teachers, but also for

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Standards Opinion How the Failure of the Common Core Looked From the Ground
Steve Peha shares insights from his on-site professional-development work about why the common core failed, in a guest letter to Rick Hess.
4 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards Opinion Common Core Is a Meal Kit, Not a Nothingburger
Caroline Damon argues Rick Hess and Tom Loveless sold the common core short, claiming the issue was a matter of high-quality implementation.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards How New Common Core Research Connects to Biden's Plans for Children and Families
A study of national test scores indicate the early phase of the Common Core State Standards did not help disadvantaged students.
5 min read
results 925693186 02
iStock/Getty
Standards Opinion After All That Commotion, Was the Common Core a Big Nothingburger?
The Common Core State Standards may not have had an impact on student outcomes, but they did make school improvement tougher and more ideological.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty