Opinion
Teaching Commentary

Schools That ‘Flow’

By Brian Bruya & Russell Olwell — December 19, 2006 4 min read

Students in an alternative high school have a weeklong unit on the history, math, and science of Motown music. It is the only week in the school’s history with perfect attendance.

Middle school students create history projects around areas that interest them, in formats ranging from exhibits, to skits, to PowerPoint presentations. Their topics include the Silk Road, the disappearance of the Roanoke colony, and the discovery of America by the Vikings.

16olwell

Elementary students gather after school for a weekly math club. Local university students supervise math activities, culminating in a family math night that brings youngsters’ parents into the school as well.

What do these activities have that regular school fare lacks? Flow.

Unlike lecture and note-taking, high-stakes testing, and a standardized curriculum, each of the above activities engages learners at their own level, and presents them with an appropriate level of challenge.

Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s concept of flow—the psychological process that describes how people balance skill, interest, and challenge—may hold an important piece of the puzzle of school reform.

Flow explains how the mind rises to challenges—how people can become “lost” in an activity that fully engages them, whether it is playing golf on a tough course, cooking a new recipe, playing a complex video game, or doing a Sudoku puzzle. According to flow theory, if the challenge level is too low, participants simply become bored, often dropping out of an activity. This might be the case, for example, if you were forced into a remedial math or writing class, relearning concepts you already knew. High school dropouts consistently report that their coursework is neither challenging nor relevant, and many drop out despite good grades.

If the challenge level is too great for the skills possessed, a person can become discouraged and drop out of an activity. This is what might happen if you were placed in a class at the other end of the spectrum, one far too advanced for you to even formulate questions about the subject. As states’ graduation requirements become more extensive and academically rigorous, there may be many students lost because they’ve been dropped into classes above their present skill levels.

Part of the key to the dropout problem also can be found in interest, or how students relate to the curriculum itself. Even if challenge and skill are well matched, most people will not find “flow” if the activity does not connect to the rest of their lives and their interests. The most powerful learning in schools is often found in activities that harness individual students’ interests and creativity—programs such as the Intel science competition, National History Day, and the Science Olympiad. It is also found in activities that connect directly to the world around students—most notably, academic service-learning courses and other forms of community engagement. If schools could harness some of the energy and learning generated by these co-curricular activities and integrate it into the curriculum, tremendous learning gains would take place.

When skill, challenge, and interest are at an appropriate balance, students can find flow, and they are able to accomplish tasks with less work and effort, even while processing more information. Performance improves through immediate feedback about how they are doing—feedback that’s given with improvement, not sorting, in mind.

Unfortunately, high schools increasingly are designed around high-stakes testing, such as exit exams and the SAT or ACT, that rewards work performed on one day, not over a period of time. Tracking also can defeat the purpose of flow, as many students trapped in lower tracks may never discover a passion for a subject taught at a higher level, just down the hall.

When skill, challenge, and interest are at an appropriate balance, students can find flow, and they are able to accomplish tasks with less work and effort.

Schools would need to be reorganized to help more students reach a state of “learning flow.” To properly help them learn, teachers would need fewer students in their classes, so that they could learn more about each student’s strengths, weaknesses, and special interests and aptitudes. Time and space within the building might need to be rearranged, too, to find the places and the blocks of time that work well for extended projects and feedback. On a curricular level, students would learn more if they were exposed to subjects in more than one class. In a more tightly integrated curriculum, if students encountered an area of strength, such as mathematics or writing, more than once, they would be better able to master the subjects associated with it.

If schools took flow seriously, the role of the teacher would change substantially. The teacher would become an expert in providing the correct level of challenge and giving quick feedback to help each student learn better. Teachers in schools that stressed flow also would try to develop their students’ ability to seek out and find flow. The most recent work in this area urges educators to help their students build the “psychological capital” that will enable them to find and engage in activities that challenge their minds, rather than wait for others to bring the challenge to them.

In the end, the worst enemy of flow may be our own low expectations of students. If we believed that our students were talented and needed appropriate challenges that engaged their interest, we would invest far more energy and resources in ensuring their success. It is only our tacit belief that up to 80 percent of them are untalented, and not worthy of challenge, that keeps us from trying.

A version of this article appeared in the December 20, 2006 edition of Education Week as Schools That ‘Flow’

Let us know what you think!

We’re looking for feedback on our new site to make sure we continue to provide you the best experience.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Future of Work Webinar
Digital Literacy Strategies to Promote Equity
Our new world has only increased our students’ dependence on technology. This makes digital literacy no longer a “nice to have” but a “need to have.” How do we ensure that every student can navigate
Content provided by Learning.com
Mathematics Online Summit Teaching Math in a Pandemic
Attend this online summit to ask questions about how COVID-19 has affected achievement, instruction, assessment, and engagement in math.
School & District Management Webinar Examining the Evidence: Catching Kids Up at a Distance
As districts, schools, and families navigate a new normal following the abrupt end of in-person schooling this spring, students’ learning opportunities vary enormously across the nation. Access to devices and broadband internet and a secure

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Great Oaks AmeriCorps Fellow August 2021 - June 2022
New York City, New York (US)
Great Oaks Charter Schools
Great Oaks AmeriCorps Fellow August 2021 - June 2022
New York City, New York (US)
Great Oaks Charter Schools
Data Analyst
New York, NY, US
New Visions for Public Schools

Read Next

Teaching Opinion Improving Instruction With Student Data
Three educators offer ideas on how they use student data to improve their instruction.
7 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
iStock/Getty
Teaching Opinion Using Data to Support Students
Three educators write about how they use data to improve their instruction.
9 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
iStock/Getty
Teaching This Awful Year in 6 Words
EdWeek invited readers—and its staffers—to summarize this frightening, depressing, infuriating year in only six words. Here's what they said.
1 min read
Mini Memoir 6 words
iStock/Getty
Teaching Opinion Why Asking the Teacher Isn’t Always the Best Course of Action
During COVID-19, our conversations focus on the learning loss of students. We should be asking why the adults always control the learning.
5 min read
Image shows a speech bubble divided into 4 overlapping, connecting parts.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty and Laura Baker/Education Week