Opinion
Standards Letter to the Editor

Common-Core Critique Seen as ‘Off the Mark’

April 03, 2012 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

Joanne Yatvin presents a strongly worded critique of the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and the related publishers’ criteria in her Commentary “A Flawed Approach to Reading in the Common-Core Standards,” (Feb. 29, 2012).

Her primary claim is that the standards and criteria focus on close reading of short, isolated informational texts, an emphasis that (a) ignores research and practice, (b) is impractical, and (c) leads to classrooms that are dreary and harsh, leaving her “aghast.” Unfortunately, her essay is flawed by misrepresentations and misstatements:

• “Any content or skill not specified in the standards [is] excluded"—this claim appears in neither the standards nor the criteria.

• “It ...excludes any early emphasis on understanding what one reads"—a misreading of the standards.

• The domination of fiction is a “reflection of children’s developmental stages, their interests, and their limited experience"—the National Academy of Sciences, or NAS, found in a 2012 report: “Before they even enter school, children have developed their own ideas about the physical, biological, and social worlds.”

• “The standards overestimate the intellectual, physiological, and emotional development of young children"—an NAS report from 2000 concluded that children are capable of sophisticated levels of thinking and reasoning when provided with support.

Ms. Yatvin’s claims are off the mark, but I have different concerns that are related to the promise that the literacy standards will be linked to science, social studies, and technical subjects. Realizing this promise could lead to genuine reform in elementary schooling by undergirding disciplinary learning in the stem areas (science, technology, engineering, and math) and elsewhere (literature, art, music, civics).

Close reading of informational texts is an important skill, but it is not the same as reading for disciplinary knowledge, an achievement that is brilliantly portrayed on Page 3 of the standards. The document states that those who meet the standards include students who “actively seek the wide, deep, and thoughtful engagement with high-quality literary and informational texts that builds knowledge, enlarges experience, and broadens world views.”

Implementation of the standards needs to teach students to read and write about something important.

Robert Calfee

Professor Emeritus

School of Education

Stanford University

Stanford, Calif.

A version of this article appeared in the April 04, 2012 edition of Education Week as Common-Core Critique Seen as ‘Off the Mark’

Events

Classroom Technology Webinar How Pandemic Tech Is (and Is Not) Transforming K-12 Schools
The COVID-19 pandemic—and the resulting rise in virtual learning and big investments in digital learning tools— helped educators propel their technology skills to the next level. Teachers have become more adept at using learning management
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Building Teacher Capacity for Social-Emotional Learning
Set goals that support adult well-being and social-emotional learning: register today!


Content provided by Panorama
Jobs October 2021 Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Standards Opinion How the Failure of the Common Core Looked From the Ground
Steve Peha shares insights from his on-site professional-development work about why the common core failed, in a guest letter to Rick Hess.
4 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards Opinion Common Core Is a Meal Kit, Not a Nothingburger
Caroline Damon argues Rick Hess and Tom Loveless sold the common core short, claiming the issue was a matter of high-quality implementation.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards How New Common Core Research Connects to Biden's Plans for Children and Families
A study of national test scores indicate the early phase of the Common Core State Standards did not help disadvantaged students.
5 min read
results 925693186 02
iStock/Getty
Standards Opinion After All That Commotion, Was the Common Core a Big Nothingburger?
The Common Core State Standards may not have had an impact on student outcomes, but they did make school improvement tougher and more ideological.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty