Leadership Symposium Early Bird Deadline Approaching | Join K-12 leaders nationwide for three days of empowering strategies, networking, and inspiration! Discounted pricing ends March 1. Register today.
Curriculum

Need Cited for Secondary-Level Writing Instruction

By Kathleen Kennedy Manzo — October 19, 2006 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

With adolescents’ reading skills garnering increasing attention in school improvement discussions, a report released last week urges educators and policymakers also to address the need for effective writing instruction in middle and high schools.

“Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools” is available from the Alliance for Excellent Education.

The report, by the Alliance for Excellent Education, a Washington-based organization that promotes high school improvements, outlines 11 components of writing instruction that have been shown to be effective in rigorous research studies.

The meta-analysis, conducted by Steve Graham, a professor of special education and literacy at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., and Dolores Perin, a professor of education at Teachers College, Columbia University in New York City, is the first review of experimental and quasi-experimental research on precollegiate writing instruction in two decades.

Harnessing Writing

Researchers identified 11 elements of current writing instruction found to be effective for helping adolescents learn to write well and to use writing as a tool for learning.

Writing Strategies: Involves teaching students strategies for planning, revising, and editing their compositions.

Summarization: Involves explicitly and systematically teaching students how to summarize texts.

Collaborative Writing: Uses instructional arrangements in which adolescents work together to plan, draft, revise, and edit their compositions.

Specific Product Goals: Assigns students specific, reachable goals for the writing they are to complete.

Word Processing: Uses computers and word processors as instructional supports for writing assignments.

Sentence Combining: Involves teaching students to construct more complex, sophisticated sentences.

Prewriting: Engages students in activities designed to help them generate or organize ideas for their composition.

Inquiry Activities: Engages students in analyzing immediate, concrete data to help them develop ideas and content for a particular writing task.

Process Writing Approach: Interweaves a number of writing instructional activities in a workshop environment that stresses extended writing opportunities, writing for authentic audiences, personalized instruction, and cycles of writing.

Study of Models: Provides students with opportunities to read, analyze, and emulate models of good writing.

Writing for Content Learning: Uses writing as a tool for learning content material.

SOURCE: Alliance for Excellent Education

“Writing well is not just an option for young people—it is a necessity,” the report, “Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools” says. “Along with reading comprehension, writing skill is a predictor of academic success and a basic requirement for participation in civic life and in the global economy.”

The findings suggest that teachers incorporate explicit instruction in a variety of writing strategies: summarizing information, crafting sophisticated sentences, and writing in the content areas. The authors also found that building students’ skills in organizing their ideas prior to writing, and giving them opportunities to work together to plan, draft, revise, and edit their compositions, can improve proficiency.

“This shows that we actually have well-validated knowledge of what is effective for kids who are low-achieving writers,” said Andrés Henríquez, who oversees the adolescent-literacy program at the Carnegie Corporation of New York, which underwrote the study. “Rather than implementing writing in willy-nilly fashion,” he said, “we should be pushing the whole idea of advancing literacy to a much higher level, and the need to pay attention to the kinds of things that are really working.”

Limited Review

Because of the limited number of studies that met the authors’ research criteria, the study does not address instruction in spelling, handwriting, punctuation, and vocabulary. Nor was students’ motivation to write studied.

The authors did not look at a large body of qualitative studies on writing either, such as case studies and classroom observations.

Even the limited review of the research yielded much of what is widely agreed upon in the field and seems to reinforce many of the recommendations made by national organizations over the past three decades, said Randy Bomer, a former president of the National Council of Teachers of English, based in Urbana, Ill.

Mr. Bomer, an education professor at the University of Texas at Austin, said the field could also benefit from analyses of other types of studies, such as ethnographies, case studies, and other classroom-based research.

“For those people only persuaded by statistical-effect sizes, this report might be a useful marshalling of evidence for some things,” Mr. Bomer said. “For those people who would like to see how writing instruction works in classrooms, they have to go somewhere else.”

The report also takes on a topic that could now be viewed as out of date. One of the recommended elements of writing instruction is use of a word processor, which has been shown in studies to be a useful tool, particularly for low-achieving writers, the report says.

Mr. Bomer calls that recommendation “quaint” given that technology developed since those studies on word processors were completed—like text-messaging, Internet blogs, and other computer-based outlets for daily student writing—are widely accessible and allow for multimedia literacy activities.

Patricia Lambert Stock, a visiting scholar to the National Writing Project at the University of California, Berkeley, agrees with the report’s findings, and its recommendations for further research in the field. But making writing a priority amid many other curricular pressures is always a challenge for teachers, she said.

“We know a lot about how to do writing instruction well,” said Ms. Stock, who served on the National Commission on Writing in America’s Schools and Colleges, which recommended in its own report in 2003 setting a national agenda for improving students’ writing proficiency. (“Panel Calls for Writing Revolution in Schools,” April 30, 2003.)

“But often,” she added, “the working conditions in schools are not what they should be to enable teachers to put those strategies in place.”

A version of this article appeared in the October 25, 2006 edition of Education Week as Need Cited for Secondary-Level Writing Instruction

Events

Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Science of Reading: Emphasis on Language Comprehension
Dive into language comprehension through a breakdown of the Science of Reading with an interactive demonstration.
Content provided by Be GLAD
English-Language Learners Webinar English Learners and the Science of Reading: What Works in the Classroom
ELs & emergent bilinguals deserve the best reading instruction! The Reading League & NCEL join forces on best practices. Learn more in our webinar with both organizations.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Curriculum Explainer Social Studies and Science Get Short Shrift in Elementary Schools. Why That Matters
Learn why the subjects play a key role in elementary classrooms—and how new policy debates may shift the status quo.
10 min read
Science teacher assists elementary school student in the classroom
iStock / Getty Images Plus
Curriculum Letter to the Editor Finance Education in Schools Must Be More Than Personal
Schools need to teach students to see how their spending impacts others, writes the executive director of the Institute for Humane Education.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Whitepaper
Media Literacy for the Digital Era: A Must-Have Guide
Equip educators and students with strategies to discern truth amidst misinformation and AI with practical strategies and interactive acti...
Content provided by Britannica Education
Curriculum Q&A Why One District Hired Its Students to Review Curricula
Virginia's Hampton City school district pays a cadre of student interns to give feedback on curriculum.
3 min read
Kate Maxlow, director of curriculum, instruction, and assessment at Hampton City Schools, who helped give students a voice in curriculum redesign, works in her office on January 12, 2024.
Kate Maxlow is the director of curriculum, instruction, and assessment in Virginia's Hampton City school district. She worked with students to give them a voice in shaping curriculum.
Sam Mallon/Education Week