Standards

Miss. State Board Votes to Leave PARCC, Seek New Test for Next School Year

By Andrew Ujifusa — January 16, 2015 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

UPDATED

The Mississippi Board of Education voted today to leave the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC), a consortium developing tests aligned to the Common Core State Standards, and to seek a new test for next school year.

The state board announced that it would seek a new state assessment in English/language arts and math for the 2015-16 school year by issuing a request for proposals on Feb. 2. The state still plans to administer the PARCC exam this school year.

In a statement announcing the decision, the chairman of the state board, John Kelly, said the move would help create several options for Mississippi as it considers a new assessment.

“The new RFP process will give the state the opportunity to seek competitive, multi-year bids,” Kelly said. “Our exit from PARCC will help ensure the process is open and transparent.”

Mississippi’s withdrawal from PARCC would leave 11 states plus the District of Columbia in the consortium. The board’s vote doesn’t change the number of states slated to administer PARCC in the 2014-15 school year.

The consortium has required the sign-off of the governor and the state superintendent along with the state board in order for a state to formally depart the consortium. That’s been an issue in Louisiana.

Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant, a Republican, supports the state board of education’s decision, a spokesman for his office, Knox Graham, told Education Week in an e-mail.

UPDATE: “I appreciate the actions of State Superintendent Wright and the Board of Education today. I’m encouraged this will give us the opportunity, like many other states, to competitively bid-out our student assessments, while maintaining the highest standards without federal interference,” Bryant said in a statement.

And while state Superintendent Carey Wright serves on PARCC’s governing board, last November, she discussed plans by the board to issue the RFP for a state assessment in 2015-16 and beyond. Speaking of the need for a multi-year contract for testing, Wright said in a statement, “Changing tests each year creates a moving target and doesn’t provide an accurate picture of what students are learning.”

My colleague Sean Cavanagh has covered controversy surounding the contract to administer the PARCC test in Mississippi, and how that spat ties into broader disagreements about PARCC test administration.

The awarding of a PARCC contract is the subject of a legal battle in the state of New Mexico, where a major vendor, the American Institutes for Research, is challenging a potentially enormous award for testing work to Pearson. The AIR has claimed that the bidding process was biased in favor of Pearson.

A version of this news article first appeared in the State EdWatch blog.


Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
6 Key Trends in Teaching and Learning
As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and a return to the classroom for many—we come better prepared, but questions remain. How will the last year impact teaching and learning this school
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Leadership for Racial Equity in Schools and Beyond
While the COVID-19 pandemic continues to reveal systemic racial disparities in educational opportunity, there are revelations to which we can and must respond. Through conscientious efforts, using an intentional focus on race, school leaders can
Content provided by Corwin
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Evaluating Equity to Drive District-Wide Action this School Year
Educational leaders are charged with ensuring all students receive equitable access to a high-quality education. Yet equity is more than an action. It is a lens through which we continuously review instructional practices and student
Content provided by BetterLesson

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Standards Opinion How the Failure of the Common Core Looked From the Ground
Steve Peha shares insights from his on-site professional-development work about why the common core failed, in a guest letter to Rick Hess.
4 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards Opinion Common Core Is a Meal Kit, Not a Nothingburger
Caroline Damon argues Rick Hess and Tom Loveless sold the common core short, claiming the issue was a matter of high-quality implementation.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards How New Common Core Research Connects to Biden's Plans for Children and Families
A study of national test scores indicate the early phase of the Common Core State Standards did not help disadvantaged students.
5 min read
results 925693186 02
iStock/Getty
Standards Opinion After All That Commotion, Was the Common Core a Big Nothingburger?
The Common Core State Standards may not have had an impact on student outcomes, but they did make school improvement tougher and more ideological.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty