Standards & Accountability

Ky. Results Mixed on Common-Core-Aligned Tests

By Andrew Ujifusa — October 08, 2013 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Results in Kentucky from a second year of assessments aligned to the Common Core State Standards reveal improvement for many groups of students, but some scores remained flat or dipped on the English/language arts and mathematics exams intended to assess college and career readiness.

Middle and high school students showed progress on the Kentucky Performance Rating for Education Progress (K-PREP) reading tests for the 2012-13 school year. But high school performance in math dropped, and various achievement gaps among racial groups also persisted in the scores released by the state last month.

The changing nature of tests as they are aligned to the common core can be highly controversial. There was concern and criticism in New York this past summer, for example, when such new tests administered in the 2012-13 school year produced markedly lower scores.

Critics say the new test results will harm schools, teachers, and students. But the revamped tests’ defenders argue that the new test results are more accurate depictions of students’ knowledge and capabilities.

The concern “is they did not go up fast enough,” Kentucky Commissioner of Education Terry Holliday said during a Sept. 26 press conference when he discussed the results.

Proficiency Ups and Downs

The new common-core-aligned tests were first given in the 2011-12 school year, replacing the previous Commonwealth Accountability Testing System (CATS), and scores on those first K-PREP tests plunged dramatically that year. For example, reading proficiency among elementary school students dropped by 28 percentage points from 2010-11 levels, down to 48 percent of students scoring at proficient levels.

Such drops weren’t repeated on the 2012-13 school year tests. At several levels, there were improvements.

Reading proficiency rose for both middle school students (from 46.8 percent to 51.1 percent) and high school students (from 52.2 percent to 55.8 percent), while math proficiency for elementary school students also rose by 3.5 percentage points, up to 43.9 percent.

Students receiving free and reduced-price meals in both middle and high schools showed improvement,while black students in elementary school math and middle school reading improved by nearly 3 and 4 percentage points, respectively.

But high school math scores dipped by 4 percentage points, to 36 percent proficient, while reading scores for all elementary school students remained flat.

In addition, key achievement gaps showed no signs of shrinking. The performance gap between black elementary school students and their white counterparts in math crept up, from 20.7 percentage points to 21.4 percentage points, for example, and the black-white gaps in math for both middle and high schools also grew by small amounts.

Most subgroups of students missed their performance targets on the tests, including low-income students, black students, and English-language learners. (These are aspirational goals set by the state, but not used for accountability purposes.) Asian middle school students were the only group to hit their aspirational target on the reading test.

Mr. Holliday said that the decrease in the high school math scores in particular could be attributed to the increase in the number of test-takers from about 40,600 in the 2011-12 school year to about 44,100 in 2012-13; he argued such an increase typically leads to lower test results.

Meanwhile, scores on the ACT in math for high school students increased from 2011-12 to 2012-13, he noted, showing that a greater proportion of students were demonstrating college- and career-readiness in that area. (The math score for the state’s public school juniors went from 18.8 to 18.9 over the past year, but since 2007-08, the department said, the score has gone up by 0.8 points.)

The score gains are consistent with expectations as schools implement the common core, said Chris Minnich, the executive director of the Council of Chief State School Officers, which oversaw the development of the standards along with the National Governors Association.

“We wouldn’t expect the adjustment to higher standards to take place in one year. So the good news is that the trend is in the right direction,” he said.

Warning Signs Seen

But others saw more ominous signs. While it’s too soon to draw broad conclusions, the results, in particular those that reveal a persistent achievement gap over the first two years of testing with the standards, “don’t offer the kind of encouragement that a lot of people wanted to see,” said Richard Innes, an education policy analyst at the Bluegrass Institute, a right-leaning think tank in Lexington, Ky.

“We’re leaving far too many kids—whites and blacks—with an inadequate education,” he said.

Related Tags:

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Reflections on Evidence-Based Grading Practices: What We Learned for Next Year
Get real insights on evidence-based grading from K-12 leaders.
Content provided by Otus
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Creating Resilient Schools with a Trauma-Responsive MTSS
Join us to learn how school leaders are building a trauma-responsive MTSS to support students & improve school outcomes.
School & District Management Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: We Can’t Engage Students If They Aren’t Here: Strategies to Address the Absenteeism Conundrum
Absenteeism rates are growing fast. Join Peter DeWitt and experts to learn how to re-engage students & families.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Standards & Accountability States Are Testing How Much Leeway They Can Get From Trump's Ed. Dept.
A provision in the Every Student Succeeds Act allows the secretary of education to waive certain state requirements.
7 min read
President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025.
President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025.
Ben Curtis/AP
Standards & Accountability State Accountability Systems Aren't Actually Helping Schools Improve
The systems under federal education law should do more to shine a light on racial disparities in students' performance, a new report says.
6 min read
Image of a classroom under a magnifying glass.
Tarras79 and iStock/Getty
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Standards & Accountability Sponsor
Demystifying Accreditation and Accountability
Accreditation and accountability are two distinct processes with different goals, yet the distinction between them is sometimes lost among educators.
Content provided by Cognia
Various actions for strategic thinking and improvement planning process cycle
Photo provided by Cognia®
Standards & Accountability What the Research Says More than 1 in 4 Schools Targeted for Improvement, Survey Finds
The new federal findings show schools also continue to struggle with absenteeism.
2 min read
Vector illustration of diverse children, students climbing up on a top of a stack of staggered books.
iStock/Getty