Standards

Feds Want More Info from Indiana to Preserve NCLB Waiver

By Andrew Ujifusa — May 02, 2014 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Crossposted from the Politics K-12 blog

by Alyson Klein

UPDATED

Indiana, which recently became the first state to ditch the Common Core Standards, has landed itself in hot waiver water with the U.S. Department of Education. While the Hoosier State hasn’t officially been placed on “high risk” status—the dubious distinction that proceeded the revocation of Washington state’s waiver—its flexibility is definitely on thin ice with the feds.The Education Department sent a letter to Indiana May 1 explaining that conditions have now been placed on its waiver.

States didn’t have to adopt the common core in order to get a federal waiver from the mandates of the No Child Left Behind Act. Instead, they simply have to adopt standards that will get students ready for college or the workforce. Common core counts, but a state can also use standards that have gotten the seal of approval from its post-secondary institutions. (Virginia, for example, went this route.)

Indiana’s State Board of Education recently approved a new set of standards to replace the common core. (My colleague, Andrew Ujifusa, sketched out here the substantial similarities between the new Indiana’s new standards and the common core). The department is now asking the state to provide evidence that these new standards pass muster with the state university system.

And Indiana, like more than half a dozen states, originally planned to be part of one of two consortia developing exams aligned to the common core but then dropped out. Before nixing the standards, Indiana decided not to use the test from the consortia it belonged to, PARCC. Now the department wants the state’s plan for a new test, aligned to its newly adopted standards.

Indiana, like many states, was also dinged by waiver monitors for failing to meet expectations in a number of other areas, including intervening in low-performing schools.

Importantly, however, Indiana isn’t being placed on “high risk”, as Washington was, and as Arizona, Kansas, and Oregon are. So far, the department has shied away from using the high-risk label for states that reject the common core and tests. The administration has used it only for states that run afoul of its vision for teacher evaluation.

The Hoosier State must submit an amended waiver within 60 days to assuage the feds’ concerns.

Glenda Ritz, the Indiana state chief, said, essentially, that her state is ready to comply with the federal department’s requests. “My Department has been working diligently to address the issues made public in today’s report,” she said in a statement. “My Department is prepared to demonstrate full compliance with our flexibility waiver and submit amendments that are necessary due to legislative action that has been taken since the 2013 legislative session.”

Related Tags:

A version of this news article first appeared in the State EdWatch blog.


Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
6 Key Trends in Teaching and Learning
As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and a return to the classroom for many—we come better prepared, but questions remain. How will the last year impact teaching and learning this school
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Ensuring Continuity of Learning: How to Prepare for the Next Disruption
Across the country, K-12 schools and districts are, again, considering how to ensure effective continuity of learning in the face of emerging COVID variants, politicized debates, and more. Learn from Alexandria City Public Schools superintendent
Content provided by Class
Teaching Profession Live Online Discussion What Have We Learned From Teachers During the Pandemic?
University of California, Santa Cruz, researcher Lora Bartlett and her colleagues spent months studying how the pandemic affected classroom teachers. We will discuss the takeaways from her research not only for teachers, but also for

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Standards Opinion How the Failure of the Common Core Looked From the Ground
Steve Peha shares insights from his on-site professional-development work about why the common core failed, in a guest letter to Rick Hess.
4 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards Opinion Common Core Is a Meal Kit, Not a Nothingburger
Caroline Damon argues Rick Hess and Tom Loveless sold the common core short, claiming the issue was a matter of high-quality implementation.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards How New Common Core Research Connects to Biden's Plans for Children and Families
A study of national test scores indicate the early phase of the Common Core State Standards did not help disadvantaged students.
5 min read
results 925693186 02
iStock/Getty
Standards Opinion After All That Commotion, Was the Common Core a Big Nothingburger?
The Common Core State Standards may not have had an impact on student outcomes, but they did make school improvement tougher and more ideological.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty