Law & Courts

Supreme Court Declines to Suspend Mich. Affirmative Action Ban

By Andrew Trotter — January 22, 2007 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The U.S. Supreme Court has turned down an emergency motion to suspend a Michigan law that bars the state’s universities from using affirmative action in admissions.

Michigan citizens’ groups, led by the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration, and Immigration Rights and to Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary, based in Detroit, had filed the request after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, in Cincinnati, overturned a federal district court’s injunction suspending Proposition 2, which was passed by Michigan voters in November. A three-judge panel of the 6th Circuit court said the ballot initiative was likely to be upheld.

After legal setbacks for the law’s opponents, the University of Michigan, Michigan State University, and Wayne State University last month dropped consideration of race and gender from their admissions policies.

The opponents asked Justice Stevens, as circuit justice for the 6th Circuit, to reinstate the injunction.

In papers filed with Justice Stevens on Jan. 17, the three universities and Michigan Gov. Jennifer M. Granholm, a Democrat, also sought the reinstatement of the injunction. The universities contended that the sudden abandonment of their former admissions policies was unfair to students who had applied for admission for the fall 2007 academic term.

Court papers filed by Michigan Attorney General Michael A. Cox, however, argued that the stay by the appeals court should remain in place.

Justice Stevens, who could have issued a decision by himself, referred the motion in Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Granholm (No. 06A678) to the full Supreme Court. The court’s order denying the motion, issued late on Friday, Jan. 19, gave no further details.

Consideration of the merits of the case is still pending in the lower courts, and Gov. Granholm has ordered a review of the impact of the new law on state programs, due by February.

Events

School Climate & Safety K-12 Essentials Forum Strengthen Students’ Connections to School
Join this free event to learn how schools are creating the space for students to form strong bonds with each other and trusted adults.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Standards-Based Grading Roundtable: What We've Achieved and Where We're Headed
Content provided by Otus
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Creating Confident Readers: Why Differentiated Instruction is Equitable Instruction
Join us as we break down how differentiated instruction can advance your school’s literacy and equity goals.
Content provided by Lexia Learning

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts In 1974, the Supreme Court Recognized English Learners' Rights. The Story Behind That Case
The Lau v. Nichols ruling said students have a right to a "meaningful opportunity" to participate in school, but its legacy is complex.
12 min read
Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court William O. Douglas is shown in an undated photo.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, shown in an undated photo, wrote the opinion in <i>Lau</i> v. <i>Nichols</i>, the 1974 decision holding that the San Francisco school system had denied Chinese-speaking schoolchildren a meaningful opportunity to participate in their education.
AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Declines to Hear School District's Transgender Restroom Case
The case asked whether federal law protects transgender students on the use of school facilities that correspond to their gender identity.
4 min read
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Law & Courts What a Proposed Ban on AI-Assisted ‘Deep Fakes’ Would Mean for Cyberbullying
Students who create AI-generated, intimate images of their classmates would be breaking federal law, if a new bill is enacted.
2 min read
AI Education concept in blue: A robot hand holding a pencil.
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts Supreme Court Declines Case on Corporal Punishment for Student With Autism
The justices refused to hear the appeal of an 11-year-old Louisiana student who alleges that two educators slapped her on her wrists.
3 min read
The Supreme Court building is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 10, 2023.
The Supreme Court building is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 10, 2023.
Patrick Semansky/AP